User talk:Servant Saber~enwiki

Please use the rationale parameter to explain why this user talk page should be deleted. (E.g., {{db-g7|rationale= }}.) Thanks!

Per the User page guidelines, user talk pages are generally not deleted, barring legal threats or other grievous violations that have to be removed for legal reasons; however, exceptions to this can be and are made on occasion for good reason (see right to vanish). In addition, nonpublic personal information and potentially libellous information posted to your talk page may be removed by making a request for oversight.

PROFILE • TALK • E-MAIL • LATEST EDITS • CONTRIBUTIONS • PICTURES • TO DO

USE THIS PAGE TO CONTACT ME, USING A NEW HEADER FOR NEW TOPICS. EVENTUAL ANSWERS WILL BE POSTED HERE.

ARCHIVED TALK PAGES: APRIL 2007 • OCTOBER 2007 • MARCH 2008

Good job

Nice one. Looks like you got Panelgets blocked indefinitely. Although, he kind of did that himself. Seriously, did you read his talk page? That guy was a serious dipshit. If anyone else reads this don't give me warnings about WP:CIVIL as I am well aware of wikipedia's "rules," but seriously that guy was not only a vandal but was very very very stupid... Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 19:45, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Anti-Americanism

User:Servant Saber I have observed that you have been editing the article without trying to get consensus with other editors first. Wikipedia works by consensu not one POV. Can you please come to Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Anti-Americanism and tell us why are you doing this. Thank you, Igor Berger (talk) 09:43, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

WP:BOLD. I don't have to ask for permission to edit an article. If anyone has an issue with what I'm doing they are free to point it out. --SABER^EXCALIBUR! 09:45, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Please come to ANI as per my request. Thank you, Igor Berger (talk) 09:48, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

BOLD does not mean WP:OWN. You need to talk about your edits on the article's talk page which you are clearly not doing. You are cutting out big sections of the article based on what? Igor Berger (talk) 09:53, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

You're wrong, I don't need to explain my edits in advance. If someone wants me to I'll do it, like now, but not otherwise. How about you read my edit summaries, anyway. I use them for a reason. --SABER^EXCALIBUR!

I am not questioning your edits but that you do not ask other editors as to what should be done. Igor Berger (talk) 10:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

I believe myself to be perfectly capable to ake my own decisions. If everyone would have to ask someone else about what he should do, we'd never get anywhere. --SABER^EXCALIBUR! 10:06, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the comments. You do know what you doing. This is crap Igor Berger (talk) 10:29, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

• As much as I agree with your BOLD style of editing, can you tell me why we need all the 5 warning tags? Igor Berger (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 04:35, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

My mistake. I removed the unencyclopedic one. --SABER^EXCALIBUR! 04:39, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

• The article looks good, but we should add the Anti-Americanism sentiment by Arabs because of American support for Israel. This may get a bit hot because of the Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad vocal opposition to Zionists and their support for the creation of The State of Israel. Good luck, Igor Berger (talk) 11:11, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
• I am being told that I cannot edit Anti-Americanism because User:Bsharvy complained about me! Good luck editing the article. Igor Berger (talk) 13:31, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
• I think you better go edit something else. Bsharvey wants to OWN the article, he requested RfC Talk:Anti-Americanism#RFC:_Is_Neutrality_in_Dispute.3F Waste of time to reason with his POV. Igor Berger (talk) 13:49, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
• User:Equazcion is helping to mediate the article. He has warned User:Bsharvy if he cannot follow consensus of all the editors involved the issue will be brought to ANI. here and here. I hope he follows the consensus! You are welcome to come edit the article in a constructive NPOV way. Igor Berger (talk) 06:14, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

English is not the issue

You probably haven't had a chance to read the whole of this thread so I am commenting because I'd hate you to think that this has anything really to do with Igor's good or bad English. To be clear it doesn't it has to do with what people are seeing as his very disruptive editing style. Cheers!--VS ^talk 13:01, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Request for mediation accepted

A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party has been accepted. You can find more information on the case subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Peter Yarrow. For the Mediation Committee, WjBscribe 08:00, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

Thanks for catching my user page vandalism

I swear I wish I could be notified when my user page changes! Casull 20:22, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

It's on my watchlist... Not exactly a notification but the closest you'd get. --SABER^EXCALIBUR! 20:35, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Personal attack

With regard to your comments on Tsukihime: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Shiroi Hane (talk) 12:56, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

I just wanted to drop you a note to thank you for being willing to stick your neck into the US State Terrorism article and deal with Ultramarine's ridiculous copy and pasting. Others have attempted to summarize it instead, and keep what was valid, but he reverted them, and most editors have given up trying to deal with his tendentious editing behavior on that article. As you can see from talk he ignores consensus, and makes rather disingenuous arguments ad infinitum. Thanks again.Giovanni33 (talk) 20:16, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

I've checked your contributions

You're doing great work on Wikipedia. Have you considered requesting for adminship? In case you decide to do so, you have my support. KnightInShinyArmor (talk) 16:06, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

What, your fifth edit and first edit outside of your own user page is to suggest this? As if. --SABER^EXCALIBUR! 16:09, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Maybe you misunderstood. I'm saying that your contributions are a valuable effort to the betterment of Wikipedia, not mine. And in my opinion, it would be good to have you as an administrator here. KnightInShinyArmor (talk) 16:18, 22 March 2008 (UTC)