User talk:TimTomTom: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
resolved |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Let's talk! |
Let's talk! |
||
== Your recent changes == |
|||
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|30px|]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{#if:Bondwell|  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Bondwell]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If necessary, pursue [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> |
|||
: I'm deeply sorry but the word "war" is rather harsh. I was adding interwiki links to [[Bondwell]] and making some minor corrections. I did notice that KiB seems to be reverting to KB but I thought this was caused by my browser's cache. I didn't realize that someone was constantly reverting my edits. If there was an "edit war", it wasn't declared by me. --[[User:TimTomTom|TimTomTom]] ([[User talk:TimTomTom#top|talk]]) 12:13, 26 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:: It's the standard 3RR [[Template:Uw-3rr|template]]. Will you be undoing your edit to put back the more familiar prefixes and to be consistent with the sources for the article? '''[[User:Fnagaton|Fnag]][[User talk:Fnagaton|aton]]''' 12:18, 26 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::: Okay, but if it's the standard wording you seem to be using the wrong template. I wasn't engaged in any war. I was editing the article. Now that I've checked the history of the article and its talk page, I'm convinced my current version is fine. I've noticed the Swedish version uses [[KiB]] too. It seems your the only editor who wants to use KB instead. As I already wrote, I wasn't reverting edits, you were reverting my edits. Can't you just leave the article alone? It's fine as it is. I apologize for any inconvenience I might have caused you. Thanks. --[[User:TimTomTom|TimTomTom]] ([[User talk:TimTomTom#top|talk]]) 12:37, 26 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:::: Read the edit history again, I'm not the only editor who thinks so. If another editor comes along and puts the KB back again will you accept that edit? '''[[User:Fnagaton|Fnag]][[User talk:Fnagaton|aton]]''' 12:41, 26 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::::: If another editor comes along and puts the [[KiB]] back again will ''you'' accept that edit? --[[User:TimTomTom|TimTomTom]] ([[User talk:TimTomTom#top|talk]]) 12:56, 26 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:::::: I note you did not answer the question. '''[[User:Fnagaton|Fnag]][[User talk:Fnagaton|aton]]''' 13:07, 26 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::::::: There is no need to because the problem is already solved. If you asked other editors to revert my contributions on your behalf, you'd be doing exactly what you accused me of above. I've had enough of this. Have a nice day! --[[User:TimTomTom|TimTomTom]] ([[User talk:TimTomTom#top|talk]]) 13:38, 26 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:21, 26 April 2008
Let's talk!
