Talk:Battle of Uruk: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 08:41, 28 May 2008

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
NA	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Concerns about this article

I have two concerns about this article:

The term "Battle of Uruk" (in English at least) appears nowhere on the Internet except in this article. While I realize that you enjoy writing new articles, there is nothing in this article that is already in the article on Sargon the Great. Therefore, I am wondering whether we shouldn't just redirect this article into Sargon the Great.
I am having a difficult time interpreting the only reference. Apparently it is something entitled "History" published by the Instituto Geografico De Agostini. I can find no mention of this on the internet. Can you provide more information?

Also, please read this section on how to cite references. Thanks, Madman (talk) 02:55, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You beat me to it. I agree, this should be a redirect. A quote from this 'History' would be helpful also (and Egyptzo, please note that you need page numbers for books).--Doug Weller (talk) 07:24, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can find nothing about it on the net because everyone mentiones this battle as a battle in which Sargon defeated his rival. A book provided much more details on this subject. in Fact, I was amused to discover how much details it had about ancient Sumeria and Akkad. You have a page number in the references. It is important that Wikipedia has this battle in a seperate article because it was the first time in history that we historicaly know that an important and decisive military conflict took place.Egyptzo (talk) 08:41, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 07:24, 28 May 2008 edit Doug Weller (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Oversighters, Administrators 262,812 edits →Concerns about this article ← Previous edit		Revision as of 08:41, 28 May 2008 edit undo Egyptzo (talk \| contribs) 1,166 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 10:		Line 10:

	::You beat me to it. I agree, this should be a redirect. A quote from this 'History' would be helpful also (and Egyptzo, please note that you need page numbers for books).--[[User:Dougweller\|Doug Weller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller\|talk]]) 07:24, 28 May 2008 (UTC)		::You beat me to it. I agree, this should be a redirect. A quote from this 'History' would be helpful also (and Egyptzo, please note that you need page numbers for books).--[[User:Dougweller\|Doug Weller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller\|talk]]) 07:24, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

			You can find nothing about it on the net because everyone mentiones this battle as a battle in which Sargon defeated his rival. A book provided much more details on this subject. in Fact, I was amused to discover how much details it had about ancient Sumeria and Akkad. You have a page number in the references. It is important that Wikipedia has this battle in a seperate article because it was the first time in history that we historicaly know that an important and decisive military conflict took place.[[User:Egyptzo\|Egyptzo]] ([[User talk:Egyptzo\|talk]]) 08:41, 28 May 2008 (UTC)