User talk:R3ap3R

Hello, R3ap3R. You have new messages at WikiDan61's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

lol

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		This literally made me laugh out loud. Simply awesome. J.delanoygabsadds 16:24, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Tom Hollander

Hello, I'm still new at this, but I'm glad to do whatever is required to make Mr. Hollander's entry in the spirit of Wikipedia. I see that it was rolled back to an older revision. Does "Unverified Changes" refer to something other than references? Please let me know how I can edit the page to be useful and accurate. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Icberry (talk • contribs) 22:50, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

It's good as it is now. R3ap3R.inc (talk) 22:52, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Arch Crippin Speedy Deletion

I have removed the speedy deletion request from this page, the page clearly makes claims to notability - please be careful when tagging articles that they meet the criteria for speedy deletion. Camw (talk) 12:31, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Edit history on article suggests a "self-published" concern. What makes you think this ?-Sticks66 12:36, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

The one reference is affiliated with the league the individual associates with. R3ap3R.inc (talk) 12:37, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Removal of CSD for Ghuzarish (film)

Hi. I have removed the speedy template for the above article. Notability has been asserted, although the article needs some significant improvement. Feel free to watch the article and nominate it for AfD if no improvements are made. Best regards. --OliverTwisted ^(Talk) (Stuff) 12:45, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

It is a recreation of versus added merge tags 12:48, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

That's a good catch! And that's why we wouldn't just want to CSD (speedy) the article for A7 (not being notable), since notability was established. Thanks for adding the merge suggestion. You rock! --OliverTwisted ^(Talk) (Stuff) 12:57, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Zhao Yiman

Hi again. It's amazing what can happen when everyone works together. Look how improved this stub biography is with just a little help. You might want to thank the editor who was able to rescue the article while checking the Speedy Delete tag which was installed. Have fun editing. --OliverTwisted ^(Talk) (Stuff) 14:33, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Robert Blake (Aninote)

It's not an advertisement... The site doesn't even EXIST any more. Check the sources! Netpassport89 (talk) 19:06, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Doesn't matter if it is an advert, not notable. R3ap3R.inc (talk) 19:31, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

The warning was for recreating content AFTER THE PAGE WAS ALREADY DELETED ONCE 19:32, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

^Ftw, this article was deleted AfD. R3ap3R.inc (talk) 15:00, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Storye book (speedy deletion)

Thanks for kindly recognising my hangon. Unfortunately, as you will see from the page history, I have been slowly writing the article from scratch this evening, and Wiki people were trying to tag it before I had finished putting the first draft together. Please kindly read the discussion page before considering deleting. Because this tenor singer was previously little recognised outside of Russia, most citations are in Russian - and I don't read Russian. I am slowly gathering citations, but it's a long job. Please kindly be patient with this one. Thanks. --Storye book (talk) 20:46, 4 April 2009 (UTC)—Preceding unsigned comment added by Storye book (talk • contribs) 20:31, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of Desycling page

Hi R3ap3R.inc,

You have deleted the page I was just creating, even before it was published. How you did that, I don;t know, but it sure was fast. Because I was in the process of creating it, it was impossible to determine if this page was suited for wikipedia or not. At the moment of deleting it, it just contained 4 or 5 of the intended 50 sentences, and no pictures yet. I was still trying to find out about layout etc, because it was my first article in wikipedia. This is not very motivating and I sure do want to start my series of design topics, because I do think that Wikipedia lacks a lot of pages about design strategies.

Please help me to get the page back, so I can actually finish it. After that, you may completely destroy it if it does not match the criteria of Wikipedia, but I think that deleting something during the creation process is overkill.

Thanks,

Dosigner

I didn't delete it, and it deserved to be deleted. It was blatant advertising. R3ap3R.inc (talk) 21:41, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Ok, you're not going for the nice approach. I will try to keep it short as well. Try to read again what I wrote. I hardly even finished the first sentences and was still trying to find out how wikipedia works, as it was already deleted. I understand now that obviously I did not do it right. I should write the whole article offline and paste it in there, but you must have seen my paragrpah about criticism on the concept. That is hardly advertising. Anyway, I go to sleep now and will try again tomorrow, publishing the whole article in one piece, so you can judge with more nuance. Thanks for your time.

Dosigner —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dosigner (talk • contribs) 21:58, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Don't bother, I will see that it is deleted. The links show that "desycling" is a trademark term used FOR PROFIT. Blantant WP:COI. R3ap3R.inc (talk) 22:01, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Aqua Jones Speedy Deletion

I don't feel that the speedy deletion of Aqua Jones was warranted. This page is about a band that was popular in the Louisville,_Kentucky music scene in the late 90's and early 00's. The speedy deletion was said to be because there was no indication that the subject was significant or important. Aqua Jones has performed with the likes of Flaw, Tantric, and 8stops7. If these subjects are allowed pages, I don't see why Aqua Jones wouldn't be.

They've recently reunited and they have a reunion show scheduled for 5/27/09, so I feel as though the page is both significant and important.

Let me know what I can do to get this page out of speedy deletion status. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Herrmdawg (talk • contribs) 22:03, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I think there may be some WP:COI as well here considering this is your only contribution to wiki. Also, I didn't delete it... I just nominated it for deletion. Find me QUALITY reference from a reputable third pary, and I will consider your motion for a reconsideration. R3ap3R.inc (talk) 22:07, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Here is Aqua Jones' page on garageband.com. As you can see, their song "Hollywood Faces" was ranked #1 of 1,065 in Rap Rock on 11/09/2002.

Here is a link to Phoenix Hill Tavern's upcoming calendar. If you will please notice the entry for 5/27, that shows that Aqua Jones is scheduled to perform.

Here is a link to Aqua Jones' artistdirect.com page.

I am not a member of this band, nor do I have any financial interest in promoting them, so there should be no question of my number of contributions or motives. This is just an informative article on a band in the city in which I live. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Herrmdawg (talk • contribs) 22:22, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Put it up, and if someone else nominates it let me know and we will go AfD (where three admins preside over it). R3ap3R.inc (talk) 22:25, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Herrmdawg (talk • contribs) 22:26, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

C.Fred deleted the page. Could you please have a talk with him and allow this perfectly legitimate page to be created without all of this hassle? Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Herrmdawg (talk • contribs) 22:45, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

It's up here

Gerald Fitzgerald

I look at the Gerald Fitzgerald (priest) article and added some citations. You may want to look at User:OrangeMike's talk page about the article some thoughts, etc.Many thanks-RFD (talk) 22:25, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Kate Baldwin

Actors who land the leading role in a major Broadway production merit Wikipedia pages. Really they do.Historicist (talk) 00:21, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Reference is unverified blog post; no reliable source. R3ap3R.inc (talk) 00:27, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD discussions.

Hi again. I just wanted to let you know that I support your AfD nominations for Tom Hollander and Robert Bake (Aninote), as they definitely fail the guidelines you have used for your argument. I will not be supporting the nomination of 68P/Klemola. If you haven't viewed the improvements made by an editor to the article, you might want to re-visit that page. I appreciate the time you are talking to try to become more familiar with the deletion process, and it appears to be paying off for you. Best of luck with your editing. --OliverTwisted ^(Talk) (Stuff) 00:23, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

I saw those edits, but I can't remove an AfD tag until it is decided.... you saw before, it didn't make any sense whatsoever. R3ap3R.inc (talk) 00:25, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Kate Baldwin

Thank you.Historicist (talk) 01:55, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

John Dryzek

I don't know why you would want to delete a page on John Dryzek, he clearly fulfills the Academic Notability criteria... I'm confused by your actions.

Empanda (talk) 11:40, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

John Dryzek

You're my new friend! I had to change a few things. Here's a quick tip for academic biographies. The quickest way to verify their notability is by an ISBN search, if one is listed. Also, someone published by Oxford University Press will most likely have verifiable sources. What you would be looking for would be: no results on Amazon, or a self-published book, or lack of any legitimate academic sources to establish notability. I therefore did some cleanup on this article, and exchanged templates. Off to the races! --OliverTwisted ^(Talk) (Stuff) 11:51, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Oh, I almost forgot. Here's another tip: If you edit your talk page so that each subject heading (or most) are wiki links of the articles they concern, not only will you be able to find them easier in your archive, but you'll be able to see which of the articles you discuss are actually deleted at some point, by the links being red (for gone, outta here) or blue/purple (for saved). ;o) --OliverTwisted ^(Talk) (Stuff) 12:18, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Can you explain your revert? --Kabad (talk) 14:05, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

I didn't revert anything with this article... you got the wrong guy, go look at the edit history. R3ap3R.inc (talk) 14:06, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

He's referring to this reversion on a different article Names of God in the Quran. --OliverTwisted ^(Talk) (Stuff) 14:09, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

NPOV; it belongs categorized in mythology, as evidenced by the placement of similar articles under that category. R3ap3R.inc (talk) 14:10, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Do you find mythology in the Names of God in the Qur'an? Kabad talk:Kabad (Ctrl-click)">talk) 14:22, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Yes I do; it is UNPROVEN and believed by only one group of people. I also find from your edit history that you have an issue with maintaining a NPOV when it comes to Islamic religion. R3ap3R.inc (talk) 14:23, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

I don't think you understand what mythology means. Nevertheless, everything religious is believed by some people. As for npov that's your pov. Kabad (talk) 14:27, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Also, Islamic_mythology states as such. R3ap3R.inc (talk) 14:28, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Timothy Training Institute

Just as an FYI, G4 only applies if there was a discussion leading to the deletion of the article. An article that is speedily deleted, then recreated, is not a G4 candidate.---I'm Spartacus! ^{NO! I'm Spartacus!} 19:35, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Timothy Training Institute

Hi, I'm here because of a warning you left on User talk:Kevincarldavis warning him for removing an AFD tag from Timothy Training Institute. I went back and looked at the edit history, and I couldn't find where the article had even been nominated for AFD, much less when he removed the tag. You may have been referring to the PROD tag, which he didn't even remove, although he can. Unlike Speedy Deletion tags, PROD tags can actually be removed by the article's creator. However, this wasn't even the case, as you can see here that the tag was removed by another editor. I'm curious as to why you placed this tag. Nonetheless, I removed the PROD again and took it to AFD. Rwiggum (^Talk/_Contrib) 13:43, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

It was for WP:PROD, I couldn't find the right template to use (because apparently the creator can remove a PROD tag from their article); my bad. Thanks for letting me know! R3ap3R.inc (talk) 14:23, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Quadrino Schwartz

What prompted the speedy deletion?Sushilover boy (talk) 18:22, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Reads like an ad; creator's only contribution to wiki was to make this article. R3ap3R.inc (talk) 18:24, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

So you mean that it was flagged because the contributor was a first timer? Or it really reads like an ad?Sushilover boy (talk) 18:32, 8 April 2009 (UTC)