User talk:Rdunn

If youv'e come here in reponse to a post made by me elsewhere, please post your responce THERE

helpme: January 2009

{{helpme}} If I were to add the "Mary Rose Trust" in the request article list would I put it in the:

• Social sciences#Archaeology;
• Social sciences#History;

or

• Social sciences#Organizations

Maybe you should explain first what the "Mary Rose Trust" is? SoWhy 13:31, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

It is the charitable trust that looks after the Mary Rose wreck and other such things in the Historic Dockyard in Portsmouth. Im trying to request an article because i am supprised it

does not already exits for something this important.rdunn 13:35, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

A trust is an organization and not a historical event/account or an archeological site.

Hope that helps.

p.s. why not start it yourself?

Cheers, Jaakobou^{Chalk Talk} 17:51, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

It looks to me as if it would be more appropriate to add a bit more information about the Trust to the existing article at Mary Rose, where it gets mentioned a couple of times already. The "External link" from that page is to the Trust's website. I've made a redirect. PamD (talk) 16:27, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Re:Leonard of Quirm

I did it because two Discworld bios had already been merged as per deletion discussions (Lu Tse and Leonard) and it was only a matter of time before Bloody Stupid Johnson and General Tacticus were as well (since they had already been tagged) and I had no interest in tracking down "real world" citations for either of them. I needed a place to put Bloody Stupid Johnson, and Technology of the Discworld seemed like the best. Once he was there, Leonard seemed a natural fit. Serendi^podous 14:21, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

helpme feb 2009

{{helpme}} what do i do if an user is copying barnstars from other people's pages (against the rules it is to misrepresent)and then he reverts the edits that i make to remove the said barnstars?  rdunnPLIB  11:54, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

The same we do with everyone who disrupts the project: Warn them that it's not okay to do so and if they continue, report the user to WP:ANI. Regards SoWhy 12:08, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

your question

if youve lost your password why dont you click the "E-mail new password" button in the login page? rdunnPLIB 12:35, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

I don't register my email address, for practical privacy concerns. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Notabilitypatrol (talk • contribs) 13:01, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

3 question

{{helpme}} 1)how many ways is there to view one's watchlist?

2)is there (still?) a page that show the most vandalised pages? (there was one sometime ago)

3)how long has DO NOT SUBMIT COPYRIGHTED WORK WITHOUT PERMISSION! been at the bottom of the editting box GNU thing?  rdunnPLIB  11:44, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

1. See Help:Watchlist
2. I have the feeling that page has been hidden per this concept
3. A long, long time.

//roux   16:07, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Bank of Ireland robbery

Huh? It was a humorous aside about the incident. Delete it as off-topic from the talk page if you want but I don't see how it merits a civility warning (which I have taken the liberty of deleting from my talk page). Were you just handing these out to everybody who edited that page and got increasingly testy with each other? From your contribs, it seems you singled me out, and I fail to see how that was a comment on the contributors to the article, not the comment. Daniel Case (talk) 16:29, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Unable to remove the message? That's odd; I thought my talk page was totally unprotected. You should have been able to. Daniel Case (talk) 15:41, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

um

Hi Rdunn. On the deviantART page I wasn't experimenting... um, maybe you mistook my edit for someone elses. I added "All deviants (excluding one individual by the username "lolly") on DeviantART are referred to by their given username, which is preceded by a user symbol. " the bolded part... mentioning that all users except lolly has a symbol beside his name. http://lolly.deviantart.com/ < take a look. You seem to have taken offense by me mentioning that he has no symbol... I don't know why, it's not top secret government files that would be slanderous to the user. "All users on deviantart" having a symbol is untrue, seeing as lolly has none, so I was making it true. Again sorry that causes you offense, but, that's not my problem really. --Avalik (talk) 04:55, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Is this how I reply haha? Alright thanks. I usually only edit minor things like lists and such cause I am not the best at phrasing even the smallest things as you can see :) Thanks for putting it back. Avalik (talk) 08:51, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Konjac

Do you call African-American "Nigger"?

devil's tongue, voodoo lily, snake palm.

These are racial slurs to the Japanese. 114.164.204.239 (talk) 12:18, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for replaying at my talk page faster than I did :-) Maen. K. A. (talk) 15:54, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

thank you for the Cookie Maen. K. A. (talk) 15:58, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Romulan

Although I agree with your removal of the content, it's on the basis of that description being superficial plot summary and trivia. Although "canon status can . . . inform the prominence and relevance of information", "canon" is inherently non-npov and isn't an inclusion/exclusion criterion. --EEMIV (talk) 13:54, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

KeltieMartinFan

You were quite quick to judge that we are both "equally bad." Please take a look at the examples here, as well as from User:Ricky81682's comment here. I do not attack, I protect myself. 87.69.176.81 (talk) 11:34, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

re: May 2009

Ok, I'll have to remember that ;)--Anonymous07921 (talk) 16:44, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

List of micronations

Hi Rdunn,

I reverted your change to List of micronations regarding Austenasia, even though I agree with you that this is a relatively irrelevant example of a micronation. The issue was discussed again last month on the talk page at Talk:List_of_micronations#Austenasia. Feel free to weigh in there. The logic behind keeping it on the list was that they now appear to have a legitimate news story to cite. That said, your edit was correct according to prior consensus, so don't read anything into the rollback. Hiberniantears (talk) 15:34, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

RE:Warning mar 2009

- I have no idea what you are talking about! I added an entry, if I want to make test edits, I use the sandbox! No offense Microsofkid (talk) 20:08, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

- Also there is a rule that sais Don't restore removed comments Microsofkid (talk) 20:15, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Goto my talk page for your original post. Microsofkid (talk) 20:19, 8 August 2009 (UTC)