User talk:OscarMilde

== February

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent point-of-view pushing after warnings. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 03:52, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Again: Wikipedia is not an appropriate place for you to promote your point of view. When your block expires, I strongly recommend that you avoid the subject of homosexuality, or tread very, very carefully to avoid any appearance of pushing a specific point of view. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 03:53, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Wait, which edit are you talking about?OscarMilde (talk) 04:37, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

I would assume either of these two edits [1] [2], both are obvious POV-pushing. Dayewalker (talk) 04:48, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

I already got a warning for the first, and the second is not POV. It is a fact- a confirmed fact is not POV. It is written netrally and has not been reverted.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OscarMilde (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The last edit I did was NOT POV, and was directly from the San Francisco Chronicle. The fact that the judge in the case is gay is a fact, not POV. There seem to be a group of people here who will revert any edits to certain homosexual related articles here, regardless what how controversial or contrary they are to their own views. These same articles appear to have been written by "same sex marriage" proponents with a slight same sex marriage POV. Certain past edits of mine might be a little POV, but even the slightest edits I have made were promptly changed. Additionally, the last edit I did hasn't even been reverted, if it was so bad.

Decline reason:

The fact is that, irregardless of how this edit makes you look just as POV, that you're an out-and-proud edit warrior, making the content of your edits as irrelevant to whether you get unblocked as WP:NOTTHEM other people's behavior and your failure to assume good faith. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:21, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

OscarMilde (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Ok, I will not disagree with all the obvious homosexual activists on here. Please unblock, yes?

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= Ok, I will not disagree with all the obvious homosexual activists on here. Please unblock, yes? |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= Ok, I will not disagree with all the obvious homosexual activists on here. Please unblock, yes? |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= Ok, I will not disagree with all the obvious homosexual activists on here. Please unblock, yes? |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}