User talk:MATHEUS HS

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:59, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi MATHEUS HS, I'm happy to be the first to write on your talk page. I have made it clear and explicit that Heartbreak Station shifts away from glam metal. I hope we have reached a compromise. So do not change the article again and keep all three genres. OK? I hope we're settled with it. FateForger (talk) 22:42, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

I am very happy we finally reached a compromise, and I am very very sorry for having written on your user page instead of your talk page. I was very tired, but there is really no excuse for it. I have now moved my comment right here in the right place as you can see. I hope that everything is OK now. I'm happy to believe that now Heartbreak Station is a better and more complete album, and this is thanks to you too, because without our discussion I would have simply implemented the genres without making it clear it shifts away from glam. So thank you for this. I'm sure we'll get on with each other in a better way from now on. FateForger (talk) 14:41, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Removal of Genre & Reference from this article

Hi there. Please do not remove references and valid genres from this article. The reference you removed is a reliable and verifiable source, and it categorizes Giant as Hair Metal (which incidentally is Glam Metal) and Heavy Metal. Thank you. Amsaim (talk) 08:33, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from removing valid genres from this article. The reference supports the genres. If you have a reliable verifiable source to support your removal, please state your source. If you do not have a reliable source to back up your removal, then please do not change the genres again. Any additional removal of the well-sourced genres from the Giant article is a disruption of Wikipedia. Thank you. Amsaim (talk) 23:07, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

I agree with what Amsaim states. There is a valid source. FateForger (talk) 17:52, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

This is the last caution I will place on your talk page. The next time you remove references and valid genres from the Giant article without providing any reliable verifiable source for your removal, you will be reported to the Administrator's board. Amsaim (talk) 11:56, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Again, I couldn't agree more with what Amsaim says. This way of behaving is annoying. FateForger (talk) 16:41, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Discussion at ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. You can find the link here. Amsaim (talk) 11:45, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

You've been warned for long enough about your disruption. And no, your personal opinion don't qualify over reliable sources. Our policy has been explained to you: we want verifiability, not truth. This is a short block, because I hope you can act properly when it's released. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:18, 5 July 2010 (UTC)