User talk:BogdaNz

March 2011

Informational note: this is to let you know that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Regards, Maimai009 11:28, 8 March 2011 (UTC).

See talk page.

Hi. Could you respond to an issue at German-occupied Europe that you are involved in here and refrain from edit warring behaviour. In case you are unfamiliar with the editing policy at wikipedia, please see: Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. Thank you. --Morgan Hauser (talk) 11:38, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Atlantic 2

What does the edit summary say? And do you have an actual source for the casualties being wrong? IMO, sources routinely disagree on specific figures. TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 17:27, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Looking at the history, it looks adequatetly cited to me. If you've got a better source... TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 17:58, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

You're free to add the cite, if you've got the source with a different number. I do wonder if the 30,000 is Brit sailors only, or American only. Could also be the 72000 is a simple typo for 32000. Without a copy of the cited source, IDK. I'd check that, first. TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 07:39, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four halfwidth tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:34, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Tirpitz

Hello BogdaNz. Please stop changing the images in the article; the lead image of an article is to illustrate and identify the topic. The recognition drawing of the ship is ideally suited to this purpose. Also, the image you uploaded needs to explain how it is suitable for use on Wikipedia. That means you need to provide evidence that the image is in the public domain in the United States (where the Wikipedia servers are located), or otherwise suitably licensed. Until you do that, the image cannot be used. Also, please stop changing the length, displacement, and speed figures for the ship - these are sourced to Erich Gröner's book; Gröner had access to the official Kriegsmarine documents. Parsecboy (talk) 21:19, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Please stop this, and discuss your proposed changes on the article's talk page. Nick-D (talk) 11:44, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

The illustration drawing is accurate, it doesn't matter who created it. There are several real photos of the ship throughout the article; the one you insist on inserting in the lead section does not adequately illustrate the ship. As for the figures, Erich Gröner, who (I repeat) had access to the Kriegsmarine documentation during the war states the figures as they are in the article. Those two websites are not reliable sources. Parsecboy (talk) 13:24, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

You have now violated the three-revert rule. You should undo your last revert, or you may be blocked. Parsecboy (talk) 14:05, 16 April 2011 (UTC)