User talk:ReformedArsenal

Servetus

Hello first I would like to thank you for your interest on Servetus. I do not really know much about templates, but I saw that template was suggested for deletion. I don't know why. And my second question is if there is a way of creating a template infobox for physician & theologian. Those were the two main fields he was outstanding in. Thanks for your advice.--Anatoly Ilych Belousov (talk) 19:00, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. When you recently edited Chronological list of Christian Theologians in the 4th century, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Thebes and Nyssa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Council of Nicaea and "Protestants"

Greetings! Please forgive it taking me a week since your edit to commence this discussion. The reason I undid your adding of "Protestants" to the "Accepted by" list is simply that the list already contains "Anglicans", "Calvinists", and "Lutherans"; admittedly, this is not an exhaustive list of Protestants, but methinks that if "Protestants" should remain in the list, then these groups of Protestants should be removed from the list; it's having both that I deemed a "superfluous redundancy". Soon I'll be adding some text to the article (as I've added and edited somewhat in the past) and I'd like your consensus of what should be done before I proceed or, at very least, not intertwine this issue with the unrelated edits I intend to make. I thank you, Vincent J. Lipsio (talk) 11:02, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Apologies

I was working on two things (RS noticeboard) and the page simultaneously. I meant to place the Christ Myth section under Islam, as is proper (historical order etc.) then got distracted writing a note to the RS board, and lost my copy of the subsection I was to post in the Docetic page. Thanks for noticing that and beating me to restoring it. I'll do the edit now.Nishidani (talk) 18:45, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Bruce Herman with a painting of his father.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bruce Herman with a painting of his father.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:02, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for fixing my mistake on the Christianity page. I did think about the connotations of the word 'illuminate' but I didn't realise it had a theological connotation too. How is it used in the theological context? Jainsworth16 (talk) 15:42, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Illumination is the process of God bringing a reader to understand what is revealed in the Scripture.ReformedArsenal (talk) 20:07, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Template

Documentation[create] [purge]

Editors can experiment in this template's sandbox (edit | diff) and testcases (create) pages.
Add categories to the /doc subpage. Subpages of this page.

John Carter said that he has built whatever needs to be built for the history workgroup. FYI. History2007 (talk) 12:50, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Vejlefjord’s Request

Would you, please, take a look at User:Vejlefjord/Theodicy and the Bible (3rd draft) and give me your opinion? I want a draft good enough to “go live” without being deleted or userfied so that other editors, perhaps you, can make it a better article. Do you think the draft is good enough for this purpose? Do you have specific suggestions that you think would make it better? I am unable to do much more work on the draft. Thank you. I will check back here next weekend. Vejlefjord (talk) 02:40, 29 May 2012 (UTC)