User talk:Hu12

Welcome

Welcome to the talk page . --Hu12 (talk) 20:35, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Support this page by clicking on this advertisement. Receive a "free" userbox!!

Removing user's post from their own talk page

Hello. I've replied to this as a talk page stalker at the user's talk page. But before you added that warning, you removed the user's last reply to a previous conversation between myself and that user, with this edit. Please could you explain why you did that? Thank you, Struway2 (talk) 07:58, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

That was in error, thanks for replacing it. I've replied to your comment, however, your satement does not make for exemption of official Wikipedia policy. thanks--Hu12 (talk) 15:38, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

No problem, thought it probably was just a mistake. I've replied over there: think perhaps we don't interpret LINKSPAM/ELYES the same way. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 16:08, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestion. I've requested opinions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Opinions wanted about including a link to a player's club profile in their Ext links section. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 17:00, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Question, Why are you asking them permission to spam the external links section? That wasn't the suggestion. Please re-read my suggestion. Has nothing to with external links section. thanks--Hu12 (talk) 18:51, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Content Delivery Network Page / Broken Links

Hi, if you are not happy with the new sources for broken links can you delete it completely so that people would not argue about brokent links on wikipedia. Best..— Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.168.57.19 (talk) 14:45, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello. Why did you call for this page to be deleted? It is currently an orphan, which doesn't call for deletion (according to wikipedia), especially as it's still being developed. Unless you have a clear awareness of electronic dance music and the self-help industry, it doesn't make sense for you to call for a deletion on subjects you have limited knowledge on. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Billyjazz79 (talk • contribs) 00:18, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Billyjazz79, you have made 176 edits since the article was created in November of 2010‎. You can not validly claim it's "being developed" after two years and be taken seriously. All topics are subject to Wikiprdias inclusion criteria and must demonstrate that notability to be included. My knowledge of the electronic dance music industry is irrelevant, as is your assumption of it.--Hu12 (talk) 01:51, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Hu12. Your desire to delete this page is mumbo jumbo. I've checked with admins on wikipedia who have contributed more than you and you are just looking for bones to pick (as you are known for). There is nothing "wrong" with this article. It needs a clean up, granted; but to ask for it to be deleted is rather silly. Why exactly do you believe it should be removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Billyjazz79 (talk • contribs) 10:59, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Hu12, I have a lot of work to do over the next month thus, I do not have time to go back and forth for a wiki article or get into a political debate. If you truly feel that this article doesn't contribute to wiki or to someone who searches for this article, delete it and do it promptly.

120.28.247.28

Hi. You warned 120.28.247.28 (talk · contribs · count) for spamming. I've seen those same bogus edit summaries ("Added Jack Lang's info",etc.) used by another anonymous spammer in the last week or two.

I wish I could remember who or where. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 03:22, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Some how seems familiar to me also, however i cant place where.... --Hu12 (talk) 03:44, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Found it: 125.60.231.188 (talk · contribs · count). Both IPs are in the Philippines but registered to different ISPs. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 03:55, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Nice find. Would be nice to be able to search edit summaries. Must be plain ole SEO, I don't see the connection with the links the connection is they are all adsense related Adsense google_ad_client = pub-1687575123054330 (Track - Report - reverseinternet.com • meta: Track - Report).--Hu12 (talk) 04:02, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

The terms of service of these sites states " This site is controlled by Perfect Insight, Inc. in the State of California, USA."...--Hu12 (talk) 04:19, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Re: terms of service -- look at this Google search: [1] I think perhaps the whole world has plagiarized some company's legal terms -- for example, I doubt Northwestern University's student newspaper is controlled by our spammer.

Interesting. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 04:37, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Looking through the same search. Templated up to page 4, but its endless...

..UUgh!--Hu12 (talk) 04:59, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

I don't think Perfect Insights has anything to do with this -- I think the only common denominator is that a lot of people have been using the same cut-and-paste boilerplate for years without examining who they lifted it from (some company called Perfect Insights that actually paid a lawyer instead of stealing their boilerplate from someone else).

I think this is the map to the real snake's nest: www.foxdirect.com. Using that, I started finding other IPs in Las Vegas and Chicago + one in Bangkok (the site owner is a traveler according to his blog. He also owns a bunch of Las Vegas-related domains).

I've posted that stuff at User talk:120.28.247.28#Additions. I went through a bunch of it, but not the final batch of 186 I just posted.
--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 05:50, 16 September 2012 (UTC)