User talk:Ludraman

Archives
Archive 1 26-1-04—29-3-04
Archive 2 24-3-04—31-8-04
Archive 3 5-9-04—17-10-04
Archive 4 19-10-04—10-12-04
Archive 5
Ludraman

Picture of the day

The Dalmatian pelican (Pelecanus crispus) is a bird in the family Pelecanidae. With a length of 160 to 183 centimetres (63 to 72 inches), a mass of 7.25 to 15 kilograms (16.0 to 33.1 pounds) and a wingspan of 245 to 351 centimetres (96 to 138 inches), it is the largest pelican species and one of the world's largest living flying birds. The Dalmatian pelican has a range spanning across much of central Eurasia, from the Mediterranean in the west to the Taiwan Strait in the east, and from the Persian Gulf in the south to Siberia in the north. It is a short-to-medium-distance migrant between breeding and overwintering areas. The Dalmatian pelican's preferred habitat is lakes, rivers, deltas and estuaries, and it feeds on various fish species such as the common carp and European perch. Like many pelicans, it is often silent, but can be vocal during the mating season, engaging in a wide range of guttural, deep vocalisations, including barks, hisses and grunts. This Dalmatian pelican was photographed in flight over the Danube Delta in Romania.Photograph credit: Charles J. Sharp

Scribd

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Scribd, by Bob (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Scribd fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Not notable, written as an advertisement

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Scribd, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 10:37, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

President of Ireland FAR

President of Ireland has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:05, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Sherlock Holmes

Wikipedia:WikiProject Sherlock Holmes, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Sherlock Holmes and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Sherlock Holmes during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ^demon^{[omg plz]} 02:15, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 02:15, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Alex Rider

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Alex Rider, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Alex Rider. Nucleusboy (talk) 17:24, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Long long long overdue thanks

		The Original Barnstar
		For your simple creation of an enormously successful resource. --omtay38 08:18, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:HolmesAdventures

A tag has been placed on Template:HolmesAdventures requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{tranclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:20, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:HolmesMemoirs

A tag has been placed on Template:HolmesMemoirs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{tranclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:20, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:BUDDHA2.GIF listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:BUDDHA2.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 16:54, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Libertas

OK, if you want to restore, that's fine with me. Jimfbleak (talk) 14:54, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Home Economics (Junior Cert)

It the stub article Home Economics (Junior Cert), you indicated in your edit of 17 October 2004 that "The course is similar to other Home Economics courses but with some differences." What are the differences, and why are they notable? Why does this deserve article status? Why should it not be a paragraph under Ireland in the main Home Economics article? Note, after four years this article is still a stub. --Bejnar (talk) 22:19, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Undeletion

Regardless of the merits of the article, please be aware that no administrator can undelete any article that was deleted per BLP, or BLP1E for that matter, without an explicit consensus to do so: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Badlydrawnjeff. Just so you know, as you're likely to get a fair bit of stick for this, I reckon. Daniel (talk) 02:34, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

BLP undeletion

Please, don't ever restore any article deleted under WP:BLP by another administrator without prior discussion and consensus, as you did here. Let's try to avoid wheel wars. Thank you. Jehochman ^Talk 02:36, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Happy Birthday

Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 21:49, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Hyperlipidemia image

If at all possible, could you give me some more (non-identifying) information regarding the case you mention in the image description. As a cardiothoracic surgeon, I'm fascinated that that patient was still alive. Ronk01 talk 23:30, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Deer on golf course.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Deer on golf course.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 04:26, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Wikibookspar

Template:Wikibookspar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Evil IP address (talk) 16:16, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 04:35, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 03:11, 27 March 2013 (UTC)