User talk:Canuckian89: Difference between revisions
Tigerboy1966 (talk | contribs) →Horse ages: new section |
Pythoncoder (talk | contribs) →Userboxes Suggestion: new section |
||
| Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
I have reverted your edit at [[Flakey Dove]]. All racehorses bred in the northern hemisphere have their official birthdays on 1 January. Therefore all horses born in 1986 would have officially become 30 on 1 January 2016 (not that there are many of them left!).[[User:Tigerboy1966|<font style="color:black;background:orange;font-family:papyrus;">''' Tigerboy1966 '''</font>]] 09:11, 24 February 2016 (UTC) |
I have reverted your edit at [[Flakey Dove]]. All racehorses bred in the northern hemisphere have their official birthdays on 1 January. Therefore all horses born in 1986 would have officially become 30 on 1 January 2016 (not that there are many of them left!).[[User:Tigerboy1966|<font style="color:black;background:orange;font-family:papyrus;">''' Tigerboy1966 '''</font>]] 09:11, 24 February 2016 (UTC) |
||
== Userboxes Suggestion == |
|||
Please note that your userbox [[User:Canuckian89/No Bruins]] is against the userbox guidelines on [[wp:Userboxes#Potentially_divisive_words|potentially divisive words]]. [[User:AnAwesomeArticleEditor|AnAwesomeArticleEditor]] ([[User talk:AnAwesomeArticleEditor|talk]]) 21:15, 11 April 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:15, 11 April 2016
| My Talk Archives
|
|---|
Archive 1 (2009) |
|
 | Please don't template me! Everybody makes mistakes, and this user finds user warning templates impersonal and disrespectful. If there's something you'd like to say, please take a moment to write a comment below in your own words. |
| Please be aware that I have autism, which means that you may find my editing patterns to be odd, or that I might be hard to interact with. So, if you can't accept me, please just move along. You can't change an autistic person into a neurotypical person any more than you can convert a gay person into a straight person. |
Thanks.
Thanks for the heading fixes. I was copying from the first edit of the 2014 bracket. :) TheGRVOfLightning (talk) 05:16, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
hi Canckian89 this is user dfrr. User:DawnDusk told me about you so i am giving you this kitten i hope you.
Dfrr (talk) 08:10, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Invitation
|
There is no indication in WP:NFC that a non-free image cannot be used on a team's season page. All the other teams in MLB have logos on their season pages.
- There's a difference between copyright and trademark. For example, something like the Phillies "P" Logo is not-copyrighted (as it is too simple), and can be used on the 2015 Philadelphia Phillies season article. However, as a logo, it is still trademarked. Meanwhile, File:Orioles new.PNG is copyrighted, so it can't be used on the 2015 Baltimore Orioles season page (it can be used on the Baltimore Orioles page, but we can't have it on every season page, since that wouldn't be minimizing its usage). Canuck89 (what's up?) 23:54, May 31, 2015 (UTC)
- All I saw was that it says straight out in the file description (by purpose of use) that it is for use in season articles.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdavi333 (talk • contribs)
- Such use in incorrect. See WP:NFC (Unacceptable use, Images, Point 14: It is not acceptable to use a logo of a perennial event (or of its sponsoring company), used to illustrate an article about a specific instance of that event). Basically, what this means is that we can use a non-free logo such as File:Orioles new.PNG on the main Baltimore Orioles page. However, it is forbidden to use it on the individual season pages, since those are repeating, perennial events. Remember, when it come to fair-use content, one of Wikipedia's goal is to minimize the amount of of fair-use content on the encyclopedia. Plastering non-free logos on every year's team-season pages does not do this. Canuck89 (converse with me) 08:05, June 1, 2015 (UTC)
- All I saw was that it says straight out in the file description (by purpose of use) that it is for use in season articles.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdavi333 (talk • contribs)
Cole Cassels listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cole Cassels. Since you had some involvement with the Cole Cassels redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 01:18, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Confusion
I don't understand how the team logos cannot be used on the articles but the Chicago White Sox logo can be on the 2015 White Sox season article? Eric - Contact me please. I prefer conversations started on my talk page if the subject is changed 23:17, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of List of current members of the United States House of Representatives by age for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of current members of the United States House of Representatives by age is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of current members of the United States House of Representatives by age until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 06:59, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of List of Chief Justices of Australia by age for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Chief Justices of Australia by age is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Chief Justices of Australia by age until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:17, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of List of Chief Justices of Canada by age for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Chief Justices of Canada by age is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Chief Justices of Canada by age until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:18, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of List of United States Chief Justices by age for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of United States Chief Justices by age is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of United States Chief Justices by age until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:21, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Horse ages
I have reverted your edit at Flakey Dove. All racehorses bred in the northern hemisphere have their official birthdays on 1 January. Therefore all horses born in 1986 would have officially become 30 on 1 January 2016 (not that there are many of them left!). Tigerboy1966 09:11, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Userboxes Suggestion
Please note that your userbox User:Canuckian89/No Bruins is against the userbox guidelines on potentially divisive words. AnAwesomeArticleEditor (talk) 21:15, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
