Jump to content

User talk:Nrgullapalli: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 43: Line 43:


Hello Nrgullapalli, thank you for your contributions. I noticed you used the infobox from [[Buchireddipalem]] as template for this village article (I still had the article watchlisted from some earlier editing), but you kept some of the old parameters from the previous article. Please make sure to double-check ''all'' infobox parameters if you use an existing infobox like this. I blanked some of the parameters, that didn't seem to fit for the current article (per Google Maps the two locations are clearly separate, with different coordinates and possibly different area-specific codes). The diff for my edit is {{diff|diff=next|oldid=743205646}}. If some actual values for an infobox are unknown, such missing parameters should be left blank for now. Best regards. [[User:GermanJoe|GermanJoe]] ([[User talk:GermanJoe|talk]]) 14:35, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello Nrgullapalli, thank you for your contributions. I noticed you used the infobox from [[Buchireddipalem]] as template for this village article (I still had the article watchlisted from some earlier editing), but you kept some of the old parameters from the previous article. Please make sure to double-check ''all'' infobox parameters if you use an existing infobox like this. I blanked some of the parameters, that didn't seem to fit for the current article (per Google Maps the two locations are clearly separate, with different coordinates and possibly different area-specific codes). The diff for my edit is {{diff|diff=next|oldid=743205646}}. If some actual values for an infobox are unknown, such missing parameters should be left blank for now. Best regards. [[User:GermanJoe|GermanJoe]] ([[User talk:GermanJoe|talk]]) 14:35, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
;Thank you for the guidance --http://saptapadi.net 02:54, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
;Thank you for the guidance --Nrgullapalli

Revision as of 02:55, 9 October 2016

Mumbai Meetup: 21 Nov 2015

Meet postponed

Hi, After a series of discussions, it was decided to conduct a joint English-Wikipedia and Telugu Wikipedia joint meetup. So the meetup date and time have been changed to 20 December 2015 at 10:00 AM IST. Please refer the Meetup page for venue details. I regret for the postponement. Thanks, ƬheStrikeΣagle 07:09, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to Bozoma Saint John, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. czar 15:59, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 6 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

please correct mistakes as you feel fit. --Nrgullapalli 03
10, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
Nrgullapalli, the above notification was sent by a robot. It was designed to detect errors in referencing, and then inform the user who made the error, so that the user (not the bot) can fix their mistake. As it happens, I reverted your edits, and this removed the error pointed out above. Editors sometimes fix each other's errors; and sometimes they ask others to fix their mistakes, once they're pointed out. It's better by far to learn how to edit without making such mistakes; otherwise, you're just making more work for others. We have an essay regarding competence to edit. I strongly suggest that you read it; I hope it's of use. Haploidavey (talk) 14:14, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

Hello, Nrgullapalli. I've reverted your wikilinks at Julius Caesar. While wikilinks are an important feature of wikipedia articles, an excess of links can make articles difficult to read. It's also important that any links provide access to a deeper understanding of the subject matter in context. Thus, a link to such an ordinary topic as horse (or elephant) might be useful if the link pointed the reader to content of direct relevance; for example, a subsection that dealt with horses [or elephants] in Roman culture. Likewise, linking to Roman History is not very useful when the linked term happens to be an obscure text, entitled "Roman History", rather than an article on the topic of Roman History. Please read WP:MOSLINK for guidance on linking. It's a fairly long document, but very useful. Thanks for reading this. Haploidavey (talk) 11:28, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks--Nrgullapalli 11:32, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

@Haploidavey: The user continues to over link. I request User:Nrgullapalli to again read Please read WP:MOSLINK.--Vin09(talk) 13:59, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the notification, @Vin09:. Competence might be an issue here. Haploidavey (talk) 14:17, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Anandabhadram (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Jewel
Miss Earth Indonesia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Indonesian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Botikarlapadu - infobox

Hello Nrgullapalli, thank you for your contributions. I noticed you used the infobox from Buchireddipalem as template for this village article (I still had the article watchlisted from some earlier editing), but you kept some of the old parameters from the previous article. Please make sure to double-check all infobox parameters if you use an existing infobox like this. I blanked some of the parameters, that didn't seem to fit for the current article (per Google Maps the two locations are clearly separate, with different coordinates and possibly different area-specific codes). The diff for my edit is [1]. If some actual values for an infobox are unknown, such missing parameters should be left blank for now. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 14:35, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the guidance --Nrgullapalli