Jump to content

European Service Module: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 23: Line 23:
===ATV-based module===
===ATV-based module===
[[File:ATV-3 approaches the International Space Station 1 cropped.jpg|thumb|[[Edoardo Amaldi ATV]] approaching the International Space Station in 2012]]
[[File:ATV-3 approaches the International Space Station 1 cropped.jpg|thumb|[[Edoardo Amaldi ATV]] approaching the International Space Station in 2012]]
A review of the Constellation programme in 2009 by the Augustine Commission prompted by the new Obama Administration had found that five years in it was already running four years behind its 2020 lunar target and was woefully underfunded, the only element worth continuing was the Crew Exploration Vehicle in the role of a space station escape capsule. This led in 2010 to the Administration cancelling the programme by withdrawing funding in the proposed 2011 budget. A public outcry led to the programme being frozen rather than outright cancelled and a review launched in to how costs could be cut which found that it was possible to continue if there was an emphasis on finding alternate funding, reducing the complexity by narrowing the scope to focus on the Moon and Deep Space rather than Mars and through reusing existing hardware reducing the range of equipment requiring development. The Ares 1 launcher intended for crew flights which had significant design issues being overweight, prone to dangerous vibration and in the case of a catastrophic failure its blast radius exceeded the escape systems ejection range was cancelled and the capacity of the Ares 5 was reduced by a third and renamed the Space Launch System serving both previous roles, the three different Crew Exploration Vehicle designs were merged in to a single Multipurpose Crew Exploration Vehicle.
A review of the Constellation programme in 2009 by the Augustine Commission prompted by the new Obama Administration had found that five years in it was already running four years behind its 2020 lunar target and was woefully underfunded, the only element worth continuing was the Crew Exploration Vehicle in the role of a space station escape capsule. This led in 2010 to the Administration cancelling the programme by withdrawing funding in the proposed 2011 budget. A public outcry led to the programme being frozen rather than outright cancelled and a review launched in to how costs could be cut which found that it was possible to continue if there was an emphasis on finding alternate funding, reducing the complexity by narrowing the scope to focus on the Moon and deep space rather than Mars and through reusing existing hardware reducing the range of equipment requiring development. The Ares 1 launcher intended for crew flights which had significant design issues being overweight, prone to dangerous vibration and in the case of a catastrophic failure its blast radius exceeded the escape systems ejection range was cancelled and the capacity of the Ares 5 was reduced by a third and renamed the [[Space Launch System]] serving both previous roles, the three different Crew Exploration Vehicle designs were merged in to a single Multipurpose Crew Exploration Vehicle.


In May 2011 the [[European Space Agency]] (ESA) Director General announced a possible collaboration with NASA to work on a successor to ESA's [[Automated Transfer Vehicle]] (ATV).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-13286238 |title=US and Europe plan new spaceship |publisher=[[BBC News]] |date=5 May 2011 |accessdate=2011-05-14| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20110506062354/http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-13286238| archivedate= 6 May 2011 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}</ref> ESA's provision of this successor could be counted towards its 8% share of the operating costs of the [[International Space Station]] (ISS); the ATV missions resupplying the station only covered this obligation up to 2017. On 21 June 2012, [[EADS Astrium|Astrium]] announced that it had been awarded two separate studies to evaluate possible future missions building on the technology and experience gained from its development of ATV and the ''[[Columbus (ISS module)|Columbus]]'' laboratory. The first study looked into the construction of a service module which would be used in tandem with the Orion capsule.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n1206/21atvfuture/ |title=ATV evolution studies look at exploration, debris removal |publisher=Spaceflight Now |date=21 June 2012 |accessdate=2012-06-23}}</ref> The second examined the production of a versatile multi-purpose orbital vehicle. Each study was worth €6.5 million.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.astrium.eads.net/en/press_centre/astrium-awarded-two-atv-evolution-studies-from-esa.html |title=Astrium awarded two ATV evolution studies from ESA |publisher=Astrium |date=21 June 2012 |accessdate=2012-06-23 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130403045627/http://www.astrium.eads.net/en/press_centre/astrium-awarded-two-atv-evolution-studies-from-esa.html |archivedate=3 April 2013 |df= }}</ref>
In May 2011 the [[European Space Agency]] (ESA) Director General announced a possible collaboration with NASA to work on a successor to ESA's [[Automated Transfer Vehicle]] (ATV).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-13286238 |title=US and Europe plan new spaceship |publisher=[[BBC News]] |date=5 May 2011 |accessdate=2011-05-14| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20110506062354/http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-13286238| archivedate= 6 May 2011 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}</ref> ESA's provision of this successor could be counted towards its 8% share of the operating costs of the [[International Space Station]] (ISS); the ATV missions resupplying the station only covered this obligation up to 2017. On 21 June 2012, [[EADS Astrium|Astrium]] announced that it had been awarded two separate studies to evaluate possible future missions building on the technology and experience gained from its development of ATV and the ''[[Columbus (ISS module)|Columbus]]'' laboratory. The first study looked into the construction of a service module which would be used in tandem with the Orion capsule.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n1206/21atvfuture/ |title=ATV evolution studies look at exploration, debris removal |publisher=Spaceflight Now |date=21 June 2012 |accessdate=2012-06-23}}</ref> The second examined the production of a versatile multi-purpose orbital vehicle. Each study was worth €6.5 million.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.astrium.eads.net/en/press_centre/astrium-awarded-two-atv-evolution-studies-from-esa.html |title=Astrium awarded two ATV evolution studies from ESA |publisher=Astrium |date=21 June 2012 |accessdate=2012-06-23 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130403045627/http://www.astrium.eads.net/en/press_centre/astrium-awarded-two-atv-evolution-studies-from-esa.html |archivedate=3 April 2013 |df= }}</ref>

Revision as of 22:14, 2 May 2018

Structural test article for the Service Module, delivered to NASA in November 2015

The Orion Service Module is the service module component of the Orion spacecraft, serving as its primary power and propulsion component until it is discarded at the end of each mission. In January 2013, NASA announced that the European Space Agency (ESA) will construct the service module for Exploration Mission 1, replacing the previous design. Based on ESA's Automated Transfer Vehicle (ATV), the new design is also known as the European Service Module (ESM).

The service module supports the crew module from launch through separation prior to reentry. It provides in-space propulsion capability for orbital transfer, attitude control, and high altitude ascent aborts. It provides the water and oxygen needed for a habitable environment, generates and stores electrical power, and maintains the temperature of the vehicle's systems and components. This module can also transport unpressurized cargo and scientific payloads.

History

Old design

Pre-ATV Service Module design
Artist's conception of the Orion Spacecraft in lunar orbit with circular solar panels

Roughly cylindrical in shape, the original American-designed Orion service module, would, like the crew module, have been constructed of Al-Li alloy (to keep weight down), and would have featured a pair of deployable circular solar panels, similar in design to the panels used on the Mars Phoenix lander. The panels, the first to be used on a U.S. manned spacecraft (except for a 10-year period, the Soviet/Russian Soyuz spacecraft has used them since the first mission in 1967), would allow NASA to eliminate the need to carry malfunction-prone fuel cells, and their associated hardware (mainly LH2 tanks) in the service module, resulting in a shorter, yet more maneuverable spacecraft. Successful initial testing of an Orion solar array design using full-scale "UltraFlex wing" hardware was reported in October, 2008.[1]

The Orion Main Engine (OME) was a 7500-pound thrust, pressure-fed, regeneratively cooled, storable bi-propellant rocket engine to be made by Aerojet. The OME was an increased performance version of the 6000-pound thrust rocket engine used by the Space Shuttle for its Orbital Maneuvering System (OMS). The SM Reaction Control System (RCS), the spacecraft's maneuvering thrusters (originally based on the Apollo "quad" system, but resembling that used on Gemini), would also be pressure-fed, and would use the same propellants. NASA believed the SM RCS would be able to act as a backup for a trans-Earth injection (TEI) burn in case the main SM engine fails.

A pair of LOX tanks (similar to those used in the Apollo SM) would provide, along with small tanks of nitrogen, the crew with breathing air at sea-level or "cruising altitude" pressure (14.7 or 10.2 psi), with a small "surge tank" providing necessary life support during reentry and touchdown. Lithium hydroxide (LiOH) cartridges would recycle the spacecraft's environmental system by "scrubbing" the carbon dioxide (CO2) exhaled by the astronauts from ship's air and adding fresh oxygen and nitrogen, which was then cycled back out into the system loop. Because of the switch from fuel cells to solar panels, the service module would have an onboard water tank to provide drinking water for the crew, and (when mixed with glycol), cooling water for the spacecraft's electronics. Unlike the practice during Apollo of dumping both water and urine overboard during the flight, the Orion would have an onboard recycling system, identical to that used on the International Space Station, to convert both waste water and urine into both drinking and cooling water.

The Service Module also mounted the spacecraft's waste heat management system (its radiators) and the aforementioned solar panels. These panels, along with backup batteries located in the Orion CM, would provide in-flight power to the ship's systems. The voltage, 28 volts DC, was similar to that used on the Apollo spacecraft during flight.

The Orion service module would be encapsulated by fiberglass shrouds jettisoned at the same time as the LES/Boost Protective Cover, which would take place roughly 2½ minutes after launch (30 seconds after the solid rocket first stage was jettisoned). Prior to the "Orion 606" redesign, the Orion SM resembled a squat, enlarged version of the Apollo Service Module. The "Orion 606" SM design retained the 5-meter width for the attachments of the Orion SM with the Orion CM, but utilized a Soyuz-like service module design to allow Lockheed Martin to make the vehicle lighter in weight and permitting the attachment of the circular solar panels at the module's midpoints, instead of at the base near the spacecraft/rocket adapter, which might have subjected the panels to damage.

The Orion service module (SM) was projected comprising a cylindrical shape, having a diameter of 5.03 m (16 ft 6 in) and an overall length (including thruster) of 4.78 m (15 ft 8 in). With solar panels extended, span was either 17.00 m (55.77 ft) or 55.00 ft (16.76 m)[clarification needed]. The projected empty mass was 3,700 kg (8,000 lb), fuel capacity was 8,300 kg (18,000 lb).[2][3]

ATV-based module

Edoardo Amaldi ATV approaching the International Space Station in 2012

A review of the Constellation programme in 2009 by the Augustine Commission prompted by the new Obama Administration had found that five years in it was already running four years behind its 2020 lunar target and was woefully underfunded, the only element worth continuing was the Crew Exploration Vehicle in the role of a space station escape capsule. This led in 2010 to the Administration cancelling the programme by withdrawing funding in the proposed 2011 budget. A public outcry led to the programme being frozen rather than outright cancelled and a review launched in to how costs could be cut which found that it was possible to continue if there was an emphasis on finding alternate funding, reducing the complexity by narrowing the scope to focus on the Moon and deep space rather than Mars and through reusing existing hardware reducing the range of equipment requiring development. The Ares 1 launcher intended for crew flights which had significant design issues being overweight, prone to dangerous vibration and in the case of a catastrophic failure its blast radius exceeded the escape systems ejection range was cancelled and the capacity of the Ares 5 was reduced by a third and renamed the Space Launch System serving both previous roles, the three different Crew Exploration Vehicle designs were merged in to a single Multipurpose Crew Exploration Vehicle.

In May 2011 the European Space Agency (ESA) Director General announced a possible collaboration with NASA to work on a successor to ESA's Automated Transfer Vehicle (ATV).[4] ESA's provision of this successor could be counted towards its 8% share of the operating costs of the International Space Station (ISS); the ATV missions resupplying the station only covered this obligation up to 2017. On 21 June 2012, Astrium announced that it had been awarded two separate studies to evaluate possible future missions building on the technology and experience gained from its development of ATV and the Columbus laboratory. The first study looked into the construction of a service module which would be used in tandem with the Orion capsule.[5] The second examined the production of a versatile multi-purpose orbital vehicle. Each study was worth €6.5 million.[6]

In November 2012, ESA obtained the commitment of its member states for it to construct an ATV-derived service module for Orion, to fly on the maiden flight of the Space Launch System, thereby meeting ESA's budgetary obligation to NASA regarding the ISS for 2017–20.[7] No decision was made about supplying the module for later Orion flights.[8]

Orion spacecraft including the ATV-derived Service Module

In January 2013, NASA announced its agreement, made the preceding December, that ESA would build the service module for Exploration Mission 1, then scheduled to take place in 2017. This service module was not required for Exploration Flight Test 1 in 2014, as this used a test service module supplied by Lockheed Martin.[9] On 17 November 2014 ESA signed a €390 million fixed price contract with Airbus Defence and Space for the development and construction of the first ATV-based service module.[10] In December 2016, ESA's member states agreed it would extend its commitment to the ISS to 2024, and would supply a second service module, as part of the resulting budgetary obligation.[11]

The new design, sometimes referred to as the European Service Module (ESM),[12] is c. 16.5 feet (5.0 m) in diameter and c. 13 feet (4.0 m) in length, and made of aluminium-lithium alloy.[13]

The new design for the solar arrays, replacing ATK's circular UltraFlex design,[14] is by Airbus Defence and Space,[13] whose subsidiary, Airbus Defence and Space Netherlands (then known as Dutch Space), built the ATV's X-shaped array of four panels. The ATV's array generated 4.6 kilowatts. The upgraded version for the service module will generate about 11 kilowatts,[14] and will span about 62 ft (19 m) when extended.[13]

In September 2015, Thales Alenia Space signed a contract with Airbus Defence and Space to develop and produce thermomechanical systems for the service module, including structure and micrometeoroid protection, thermal control and consumable storage and distribution.[15]

Service Module shown with the Crew Module, adapters and fairing panels

Lockheed Martin is building the two adapters, connecting the service module to the crew module and to the upper stage of the Space Launch System, and also the three fairing panels that are jettisoned after protecting the service module during launch and ascent.[13]

On 16 February 2017 a €200m contract was signed between Airbus and the European Space Agency for the production of a second European Service Module for use on the first manned Orion flight.[16]

The service module's main engine for Exploration Mission 1 will be a Space Shuttle Orbital Maneuvering System (OMS) AJ10-190 engine left over from the Space Shuttle program,[12] in which it flew on 19 missions and carried out 89 burns.[13] It is intended that the OMS will be used for the first three Service Modules and four alternate engine designs are under consideration for later flights, thought to include the AJ10-118k; used for the second stage of the Delta II it is a lighter and more powerful version in the same AJ10 engine family whose lineage began with the Vanguard.[17]

In comparison with the Apollo Command Service Module which previously took man to the Moon, the Orion Service Module generates approx. twice as much electricity (11.2 kW vs 6.3 kW), weighs nearly 40% less fuelled (15,461 kg vs 24,520 kg) and is 12% smaller (208.66 m2vs 238 m2 volume) supporting the environment for a slightly larger habitable volume on the crew module (8.95 m3 vs 6.17 m3) though it will have just over a third less delta v (1800 m/s vs 2800 m/s). The Orion service module will be able to support a crew of four for 21 days against the 14 day endurance for the three man Apollo.

Specifications

Dimensions 4 m long

diameter of 4.1 m excluding solar panels, 5.2 m diameter stowed 19 m with wings unfurled

Primary engine 1 Space Shuttle Orbital Maneuvering System providing 26.6 kN
Secondary engine 8 490 N Aerojet R-4D-11 Auxiliary Thrusters providing 3.92 kN
Maneuvering thrusters 24 220 N Airbus Reaction Control System Engines in six pods of four
Fuel capacity 9,000 kg in four 2000 l propellant tanks, 2 mixed oxides of nitrogen (MON) and 2 monomethyl hydrazine (MMH)
Power generation 11.2 kW from 4 x 7.375 m wings each containing 3 solar panels
Consumables 240 kg of water in four tanks, 90 kg of oxygen in three tanks, 30 kg of nitrogen in one tank

[18]

See also

References

  1. ^ "NASA and ATK Successfully Deploy 18-Foot Diameter Solar Array for ST8 Program". ATK. 9 October 2008.
  2. ^ "The Orion Service Module". NASA. 4 August 2008. Retrieved 2008-08-19.
  3. ^ "Orion". Encyclopedia Astronautica. Retrieved 2013-05-11.
  4. ^ "US and Europe plan new spaceship". BBC News. 5 May 2011. Archived from the original on 6 May 2011. Retrieved 2011-05-14. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  5. ^ "ATV evolution studies look at exploration, debris removal". Spaceflight Now. 21 June 2012. Retrieved 2012-06-23.
  6. ^ "Astrium awarded two ATV evolution studies from ESA". Astrium. 21 June 2012. Archived from the original on 3 April 2013. Retrieved 2012-06-23. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  7. ^ Bergin, Chris (November 21, 2012). "UK steps up, as ESA commit to ATV Service Module on NASA's Orion". NASASpaceFlight.com. NASA. Retrieved 2013-05-06.
  8. ^ Clark, Stephen (November 21, 2012). "ESA member states fund Orion service module". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved 2013-05-06.
  9. ^ NASA Signs Agreement for a European-Provided Orion Service Module
  10. ^ "ESA Commissions Airbus Defence and Space as Prime Contractor for US Space Capsule Orion Service Module". spaceref business. 17 November 2014. Retrieved 18 November 2014.
  11. ^ de Selding, Peter B. (2 December 2016). "Europe commits to the space station and ExoMars as part of $11 billion in commitments to ESA". Space News. Retrieved 7 December 2016.
  12. ^ a b Bergin, Chris (20 June 2015). "Plum Brook prepped for EM-1 Orion Service Module testing". NASASpaceFlight.com. Retrieved 28 July 2015.
  13. ^ a b c d e Garcia, Mark (17 June 2015). "NASA Gears Up to Test Orion's Powerhouse". NASA. Retrieved 28 July 2015.
  14. ^ a b Leone, Dan (1 August 2013). "Ousted from First Orion Flight, Circular ATK Solar Arrays Still Set To Power Cygnus". Space News. Retrieved 28 July 2015.
  15. ^ "Thales Alenia Space to supply thermomechanical systems for Orion ESM".
  16. ^ https://orionesm.airbusdefenceandspace.com/blog/airbus-defence-and-space-wins-200-million-euros-esa-contract-for-second-service-module-for-nasas-orion-crewed-space-capsule/
  17. ^ http://spacenews.com/esa-deal-hinges-on-what-trump-does-with-nasas-human-spaceflight-plans/
  18. ^ http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Human_Spaceflight/Orion/European_Service_Module
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=European_Service_Module&oldid=839356719"