Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne Pigalle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 23:56, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Anne Pigalle

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Anne Pigalle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to pass WP:GNG or WP:NMUSIC. Salimfadhley (talk) 23:32, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Salimfadhley (talk) 23:32, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:46, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

KEEP. This French born but London based singer, chanteuse, was a significant part of the pop world and even quite well known in the 1980s, on ZTT recordings, her work produced by Trevor Horn, and widely reported upon then in the music press in UK and Japan. Her career as musician and Naïve artist continues as she nears 60.Rodolph (talk) 00:43, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:57, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

• Keep. While the state of the article is quite a mess and references are absent, a quick Google search actually brought up a bit on Pigalle (just a cursory search found this, this, this, this, this). Also, released an album for ZTT Records. ExRat (talk) 10:22, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

I agree the article is a mess, etc., though the essential notability of the subject exists. Article needs serious editing and imposition of footnotes and references (ie. evidence) and some coherence.Rodolph (talk)

• Keep. Very much notable and received quite a bit of coverage in the 1980s. --Michig (talk) 10:15, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
• Keep, while the article needs work, there has been plenty of significant coverage, and notability is not temporary.Jackattack1597 (talk) 11:59, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.