Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ismael Belkhayat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:47, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ismael Belkhayat

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was originally deleted under WP:G11, which was appealed at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2021 September 18. The result of that appeal was to bring it to AfD. My role here is strictly administrative; I offer no opinion on a desired outcome. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:29, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:29, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Morocco-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:38, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:08, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

delete After all dust has settled, the most notable thing is being the brother of former minister in Morocco. He chose the right brother, but that does not make a notable encyclopedic item. Ode+Joy (talk) 23:32, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I've honestly not been sure how seriously to take the article, I even wondered if someone had given it to the subject as a birthday present! No doubt those closest to him and those who use his payment apps consider him important but that's not the same as Wikipedia:Notability (people). – Athaenara ✉ 04:50, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. per above fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:26, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete There are a couple of quality indepth independent sources among all of the WP:REFBOMBING. However, most of the coverage is either trivial passing mentions, or about his company but not him, or lacks independence. Ultimately, there isn't enough to pass GNG; but it's not too far off.4meter4 (talk) 22:36, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.