Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punchbuggy (band)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 06:32, 16 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 06:32, 16 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was KEEP. postdlf (talk) 16:10, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Punchbuggy (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Little to no success in finding third-party coverage of this band in a Google search. Appears to have been an unremarkable 90s band whose only real claim to fame is one song being used in a PlayStation game and another being used in a Tom Green movie. Strikerforce (talk) 03:13, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. By your own submission, this article meets WP:BAND #10. The article shows four releases thus meeting WP:BAND #5. I found many third-party sources meeting WP:BAND #1. The article was missing citations and WP:LEAD which I will add. Argolin (talk) 00:42, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The additional citations show that this band meets WP:MUSIC#1 and WP:MUSIC#5 through independent coverage and releases on major labels. --sparkl!sm hey! 09:05, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:30, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep based on Allmusic review alone, but the others refs don't hurt. Robman94 (talk) 15:55, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
