User talk:Mooonswimmer

Mooonswimmer, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Mooonswimmer! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GoingBatty (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1970 Asuncion Israeli Embassy bombing has been accepted

1970 Asuncion Israeli Embassy bombing, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 01:32, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: MISBHV (June 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bjelleklang was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MISBHV and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:MISBHV, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bjelleklang - talk 18:01, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Laylow, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 16:34, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul Surridge (June 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that one of the biographical notability criteria is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the biographical notability criteria at the Teahouse.

In particular, see and refer to WP:GNG for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paul Surridge and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Paul Surridge, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dominion (1995 film)

Hi, I have Noticed that you have created this article and when i first looked at it i was like no Reference no liking to other page no Categories and no External link. I thought to improve it but alot adding everything to make it suitable for Wikipedia. Brascoian ^{(talk to me)} 12:34, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dominion (1995 film)

The article Dominion (1995 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 13:14, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul Surridge has been accepted

Paul Surridge, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Laplorfill (talk) 15:14, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dominion (1995 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dominion (1995 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominion (1995 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Donaldd23 (talk) 15:53, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User pages

Hello. This is a message to let you know that sixty(!) or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to User:LindsayH, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please do not edit another user's page in the way you did mine, it is entirely inappropriate; happy days, Lindsay^Hello 15:30, 28 June 2021 (UTC) Moved from strange position this message got put in the middle of the page.[reply]

Nomination of List of major attacks against Israeli embassies and diplomats with zero fatalities for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of major attacks against Israeli embassies and diplomats with zero fatalities is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of major attacks against Israeli embassies and diplomats with zero fatalities until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Laplorfill (talk) 16:58, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to MISBHV does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Shoestringnomad (talk) 16:12, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm JohnFromPinckney. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Switzerland, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Without an edit summary, as explained above, I have no chance of guessing where you got the population and density figures you used in your changes, as they conflict with the swissworld.org source already cited. — JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 21:07, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amina Muaddi (designer) has been accepted

Amina Muaddi (designer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Yeeno (talk) 🍁 22:03, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Scharliina

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Scharliina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ambrosiawater (talk) 12:27, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Stark (designer) (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Richard Stark (designer) instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Richard Stark (designer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Richard Stark (designer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:21, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Días de viejo color (1968 film)

The article Días de viejo color (1968 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as no reviews or anything other than film database sites, videos, and other promo material found in a WP:BEFORE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 22:01, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Ekambi Brillant

Hello, Mooonswimmer,

Thank you for creating Ekambi Brillant.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article needs to conform to the standards of biography of living persons and it also needs more references. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 12:11, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Man No Run (1989 film)

The article Man No Run (1989 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as nothing of substance was found in a WP:BEFORE that could help support notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 15:11, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ABG Neal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ABG Neal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ABG Neal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DMySon (talk) 12:05, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Dundas (July 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Peter Dundas may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:42, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Issue with reFill

Hi Mooonswimmer, I noticed that in one of your recent stub creations, a link to olympics.com appeared as a garbled combination of dots and forward slashes. I assume that you're using reFill to format these refs, since this is a recent issue (see this discussion) – until and if it can get fixed, please double check whenever you use the tool. Thanks! AngryHarpy‍^talk 11:22, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mooonswimmer, I see you took my previous remark to heart, so thanks for that! I noticed some other things that could be improved with your stubs, and I'd like to take this opportunity and list some of them:

Firstly, I noticed you're using the (notoriously terrible) Visual Editor to make your edits. That's totally understandable – so did I, when I was new – but you should make yourself familiar with the actual wikitext at some point, as editing this way makes for a much less, well, stunted experience. To try out the source editor, all you have to do is click the drop-down to the left of the "Publish changes" button and select "Source editing". I also recommend you immediately press the marker button () in the upper toolbar of the source editor, which activates syntax highlighting and will make your life much easier.
For biographical articles about living subjects, you should add at least the two basic categories [[Category:XXXX births]] and [[Category:Living people]]. Just paste those two snippets of code to the very bottom of the page (replacing XXXX with the actual birth year and while in source editing mode, of course).
Thirdly, well... I'm actually going to stop at that for now; this place can be a lot to take in (even if you aren't brand-new), so I'll give you an opportunity to actually try out the source editor first. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them right here! AngryHarpy‍^talk 12:47, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeremy Rudd

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jeremy Rudd requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Rudd. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:49, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Richard Stark (designer)

Hello, Mooonswimmer,

Thank you for creating Richard Stark (designer).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This page needs to take a neutral point of view.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 11:03, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

Hi thanks for creating Bologna Torah Scroll which I’ve just reviewed. If you ever need any help with anything please leave a message on my talk page. Happy editing! Mccapra (talk) 13:08, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Harun Rune

The article Harun Rune has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The sources don't cover the subject in any depth. I have found virtually no coverage of this individual myself. I believe he is very far from meeting WP:GNG or WP:NMUSIC

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Modussiccandi (talk) 16:57, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Rudd (actor) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jeremy Rudd (actor), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curbon7 (talk) 03:32, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeremy Rudd (actor) (August 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Liance were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

IMDb is not a reliable source

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeremy Rudd (actor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jeremy Rudd (actor), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 22:50, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bernd Bergmair

The article Bernd Bergmair has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP does not meet WP:NBIO- notability is inherited from the company.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:13, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jean-Marie Ahanda for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jean-Marie Ahanda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean-Marie Ahanda until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:55, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Andrea Barata Ribeiro

Hello Mooonswimmer,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Andrea Barata Ribeiro for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 15:37, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Harun Rune for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harun Rune is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harun Rune until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spicy (talk) 22:21, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bernd Bergmair for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bernd Bergmair is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernd Bergmair until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:38, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

George Negroponte moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, George Negroponte, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hatchens (talk) 18:06, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jashmir

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jashmir requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Jashmir&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 𝗩𝗶𝗸𝗶𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗿 ℣ 02:04, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No copyright infringement. That page copy pasted the Wikipedia article. It was created after the Wikipedia article, not vice versa. Moonswimmer Mooonswimmer 02:46, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Zabih Afzali moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Zabih Afzali, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 22:08, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rika (artist) (October 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rika (artist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rika (artist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 22:05, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Hi User:Mooonswimmer please email me on patrickpcarson54@gmail.com i need your help — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.224.240.223 (talk) 13:54, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mustafa Hassona

The article Mustafa Hassona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG. Can't find many articles that speak about this individual biographically and in detail. This Daily Beast Article might pass GNG, but need a couple more GNG sources to be notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –Novem Linguae (talk) 10:06, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mooonswimmer

Thank you for creating Daniel Zettel.

User:Novem Linguae, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

When creating articles, please make sure to add more sources than just IMDB. An article with no reliable sources is likely to end up draftified. I went ahead and added a newspaper to this Daniel Zettel article, which will allow me to mark it as reviewed. Thanks for your work on this.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Novem Linguae}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

–Novem Linguae (talk) 10:25, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Karl Litten

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Karl Litten requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.golfcourseranking.com/architect-profile/list-of-courses-designed/karl-litten/756/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 17:25, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Meadow Rain Walker

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Meadow Rain Walker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://parade.com/1227537/rose-maura-lorre/paul-walker-daughter-meadow/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 17:30, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mooonswimmer

Thank you for creating Emmanuel Fougerat.

User:Celestina007, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please do add more sources. Thanks for creating

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Celestina007}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Celestina007 (talk) 18:33, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Karl Litten moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Karl Litten, is not ready for mainspace. I've moved it to draft space (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can work on it with minimal disruption. When you feel that it meets our notability and neutrality requirements, and is thus ready for mainspace, please submit it using the Articles for Creation template on the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:20, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Emmanuel Fougerat moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Emmanuel Fougerat, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your page to draft space (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can work on it with minimal disruption. When you feel that it meets our notability and neutrality requirements, and is thus ready for mainspace, please submit it using the Articles for Creation template on the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:24, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Irmgard Furchner has been accepted

Irmgard Furchner, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 14:00, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Your edit to International Seed Testing Association has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 15:25, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: I've checked the last two creations, Daoud Aoulad-Syad and Hicham Ibrahimi and neither are flagging any copyvios on the tool. I say this because I was going to consider a block if they did. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 22:59, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly any further violations will result in a block. There's been many warnings.

Mooonswimmer, this is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing.— Diannaa (talk) 23:21, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 16:27, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!

Greetings,

It is already past the middle of the contest and we are really excited about the Months of African Contest 2021 achievements so far! We want to extend our sincere gratitude for the time and energy you have invested. If you have not yet participated in the contest, it is not too late to do it. Please list your username as a participant on the contest’s main page.

Please remember to list the articles you have improved or created on the article achievements' section of the contest page so they can be tracked. In order to win prizes, be sure to also list your article in the users by articles. Please note that your articles must be present in both the article achievement section on the main contest page, as well as on the Users By Articles page for you to qualify for a prize.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
Diversity winner - $100
Gender-gap filler - $100
Language Winners - up to $100*

Thank you once again for your valued participation! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Gianluca Vacchi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gianluca Vacchi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It is deleted multiple times and title was partially blocked by SoWhy in 2019. Strong Indication of Paid editing. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 04:33, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hassan Baraka has been accepted

Hassan Baraka, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 13:33, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ranjana Kumari for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ranjana Kumari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ranjana Kumari until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DMySon (talk) 15:52, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mooonswimmer

Thank you for creating Patricia Dauder.

User:Vexations, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

The subject is notable, as her work is in several notable museum collections, but it would be nice to have an article that actually says something about her, rather than a list of exhibitions that appears to have been copied from https://iscp-nyc.org/resident/patricia-dauder. What is the point of such an article?

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Vexations}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vexations (talk) 22:54, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hunter Labrada

The article Hunter Labrada has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

"qualified to compete" is not competing. Not yet notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 08:38, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As per WP:SPORTSPERSON:

A sportsperson is presumed to be notable if the person **has actively participated in a major amateur or professional competition** or won a significant honor and so is likely to have received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.

Labrada has already competed in two Mr. Olympia competitions (2020, 2021). I have fixed a broken link and added a reference to Mr. Olympia scorecard posted on their official website. Moonswimmer Mooonswimmer

Ways to improve The Night of the Crime (film)

Hello, Mooonswimmer,

Thank you for creating The Night of the Crime (film).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please be wary of WP:CITEBOMB.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Qwerfjkl}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Qwerfjkl talk 17:16, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Tolchin (November 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Need sources about him, not by him. Reviews of his books will also be helpful. The Bloomberg article is a press release so not usable for notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Martin Tolchin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Martin Tolchin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 20:19, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Belinda Song

Hello, Mooonswimmer

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Dan arndt, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Belinda Song, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dan arndt}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dan arndt (talk) 00:08, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tova Moradi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tova Moradi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tova Moradi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

User:力 (powera, π, ν) 01:04, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brian Femminella for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brian Femminella is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Femminella until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

User:力 (powera, π, ν) 01:16, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ShaSimone for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ShaSimone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ShaSimone until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:35, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Baara film poster.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Baara film poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Jehochman ^Talk 13:40, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. I was under the impression that all mugshots are government property and in the public domain. Moonswimmer Mooonswimmer

You've been warned before. Be more careful about copyrights. Don't make assumptions when you should instead conduct a careful investigation. Jehochman ^Talk 14:18, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Brian Femminella, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 21:18, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Meadow Walker

On 25 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Meadow Walker, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Meadow Walker was walked down the aisle by Vin Diesel? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Meadow Walker. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Meadow Walker), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kali Claire for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kali Claire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kali Claire (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Behind the moors (talk) 11:27, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Siham Assif moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Siham Assif, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MickyShy (talk) 12:49, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wretched Life of Juanita Narboni

Hi Moonswimmer, thanks for adding to my edit on The Wretched Life of Juanita Narboni. I liked the edits. I was wondering, is there a reason you put back the orphan template? Farida Benlyazid links to this page. Thanks.NANPLover47^talk 16:37, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Tolchin (November 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Martin Tolchin instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Martin Tolchin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Martin Tolchin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:01, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gilles Martin (billionaire)

Hello Mooonswimmer,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gilles Martin (billionaire) for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hatchens (talk) 15:49, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind pointing out any promotional content? What exactly is being promoted, a billionaire? Mooonswimmer (talk)

Nomination of Gilles Martin (businessman) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gilles Martin (businessman) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gilles Martin (businessman) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bbb23 (talk) 22:50, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Brian Femminella

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Brian Femminella requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Femminella. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Theroadislong (talk) 20:50, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mooonswimmer,

After an article has been deleted through an AFD decision, it can not be immediately recreated or it is subject to speedy deletion, CSD G4. Your alternatives are to go to Deletion review and argue that the closure of the AFD was flawed (which can be an uphill battle) or compose a new draft and submit it to Articles for Creation for review. But it's best to wait for some time to pass before doing so. Good luck. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:02, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

C.h.a.m.p moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, C.h.a.m.p, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curbon7 (talk) 03:42, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for December 2021 Chiapas truck crash

On 10 December 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article December 2021 Chiapas truck crash, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. TJMSmith (talk) 16:50, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOLYMPIC

Hey there. Just a quick note to make sure you know that WP:NOLYMPIC changed back in October. The guideline is stricter now, Olympians have to have received a medal (or pass WP:GNG). I see you are creating Olympian stubs with no GNG passing references, so I want to make sure you're aware of the stricter WP:NOLYMPIC criteria. Hope that helps, happy editing. –Novem Linguae (talk) 15:34, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my.. I appreciate the heads up, @Novem Linguae. I had another few dozen on my list.

The guidelines for certain specific sports seem to cover any athlete who has competed in the Olympics, notably (WP:NTRACK, WP:NGYMNASTICS). 2 of the articles I created today are for sprinters, and they seem to be notable in accordance with WP:NTRACK, don't you think?

The other two are for fencers (no specific guidelines delineated for fencers). One of them is ranked 26th internationally.

Do you think I should have them all deleted? Delete the fencing ones? Keep all? Not sure how to proceed.. Mooonswimmer 19:00, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. That's a really good point about those specific sports that still qualify all Olympians. I didn't know that. Just now I made an edit to WP:NOLYMPIC that makes this a bit clearer, hopefully it sticks. I think you should keep all these, since you already wrote them. I would beef up the fencing ones with more references, if available. The worst that happens is you get a bunch of deletion notices on your talk page in 3 months when WP:NPPers review these. For any articles you create from this point on, I'd be careful to make sure they pass an WP:SNG (track, gynmastics, etc.) or WP:GNG. To pass GNG, need around 3 reliable sources such as newspapers or books that go into multiple paragraphs of detail about the subject. Hope that helps. Happy editing. –Novem Linguae (talk) 01:26, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Richard Stark (designer)

Hello, Mooonswimmer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Richard Stark (designer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Drakeo the Ruler

On 23 December 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Drakeo the Ruler, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 01:00, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Donatello Dubini moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Donatello Dubini, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:17, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fosco Dubini moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Fosco Dubini, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:17, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mooonswimmer

Thank you for creating Batkoa major.

User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi there, nice job on the article. I added a taxobox to replace the classification section. Could you please check my work? Regards

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 23:50, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Hughesdarren: Thank you for your contribution! I had some trouble with the infobox so I added a Classification section hoping someone would be able to sort it out later on. Glad to see it was done so promptly. Happy editing! Mooonswimmer 00:01, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mnelia

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mnelia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shirt58 (talk) 11:00, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mnelia moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mnelia, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -- TNT (talk • she/her) 11:52, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your proposed deletion of Jews for Israeli–Palestinian Peace

Hi! I'm just leaving a message on your talk page because I've reverted an edit you made on Jews for Israeli–Palestinian Peace which you unsuccessfully attempted to PROD. I'm letting you know in case you want to attempt again (I know little on the subject area so I'm not going to PROD it myself). EvanTaylor1289 (talk) 19:11, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@EvanTaylor1289: Thanks for the heads up! I've been having trouble with proposed deletions. Could you point out what it is I'm doing wrong? Thank you! Mooonswimmer 19:31, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mooonswimmer: I'm not an expert but I think you are adding the nowiki and code wikitext by accident. It might be where you are copying the template from that is causing it. Hope this helps! EvanTaylor1289 (talk) 19:47, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Igor and Grichka Bogdanoff

On 4 January 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Igor and Grichka Bogdanoff, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 23:02, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Sidney Poitier

On 7 January 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Sidney Poitier, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Black Kite (talk) 22:47, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of Israeli assassinations into List of assassinations of scientists attributed to Mossad. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 16:17, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2022 Bronx apartment fire

On 10 January 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2022 Bronx apartment fire, which you created and nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:32, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:International Seed Testing Association

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:International Seed Testing Association, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:53, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Richard Stark (designer)

Hello, Mooonswimmer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Richard Stark".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:48, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Killing of Barel Hadaria Shmueli for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Killing of Barel Hadaria Shmueli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killing of Barel Hadaria Shmueli until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

nableezy - 16:20, 13 January 2022 (UTC) 16:20, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jeremy Rudd (actor)

Hello, Mooonswimmer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jeremy Rudd (actor), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Walid Al Jassim for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Walid Al Jassim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walid Al Jassim until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

scope_creep^Talk 23:38, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rue le Caire

The article Rue le Caire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 15:39, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mooonswimmer

Thank you for creating Said Khallaf.

User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nicely sourced, well done.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:24, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Sabah Kenway

Hello, Mooonswimmer,

Thank you for creating Sabah Kenway.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Okay, this article has 4 sources. The first is an interview, and therefore a primary source, which can't be used to show notability. The second is a blog, and therefore an unreliable source. The 3rd and 4th are simple non-indepth coverage. So currently it does not pass WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:19, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: I appreciate the remarks! It is now obvious to me that the article doesn't belong here, at least for the time being. Just PRODded it. Mooonswimmer 14:41, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mooonswimmer

Thank you for creating Iman Abuzeid.

User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice job at expanding the sourcing after it was tagged.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:25, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mooonswimmer

Thank you for creating Une femme du Sahel, Aminata Traore.

User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

There's simply not enough in-depth coverage about this to show that it passes WP:GNG.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:52, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mooonswimmer

Thank you for creating Rue le Caire.

User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

What you need to show notability is several in-depth articles about the film. Right now, you only have 3 short listings showing that the film was made.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:01, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: Many of these articles were made for the African Film Contest, where Africine and Africultures were listed as reliable, independent source ( Wikipedia:WikiProject AfroCine/Reliable Sources ). I was dubious but still cited them in most of the articles, even when plenty of reliable sources were available. I can definitely see the notability issue now.

Just checked again for better sourcing, and after a pretty extensive search in English, Arabic, and French, I couldn't come up with anything substantial. Doesn't meet GNG. Should I let the PROD run its course, or redirect to the filmmaker's article as you did with Une femme du Sahel, Aminata Traore?

PS: I know the citation overkill on most of the articles you've reviewed is very hard on the eyes! This weekend I'll be revising every single one of them and trimming down the references ;) Thanks again for your help. Mooonswimmer 13:33, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would redirect it, as per WP:ATD. What you are doing mostly is not necessarily citebombing (although you do do it occasionally), citebombing is where you put more than 2 refs for something. What you tend to do, is put lots of different refs on different things. That's okay. But what I said for this article goes for many of your film articles, where there is little in-depth coverage. But overall, you're getting the hang of it. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:38, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mooonswimmer

Thank you for creating Swel Noury.

User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Okay, here's one when you cite-bombed.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:17, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mooonswimmer

Thank you for creating Zinder (film).

User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I'm redirecting this to the director. If you can find another source or review, like the one in Variety, that would show its notability. Right now the other 3 are simply catalogue listings.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:23, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: Hmm.. I think this one's notable enough for a standalone article. Especially considering Nigerien media infrastructure.

It was screened at:

IDFA, the world's largest documentary film festival. [1]**
FESPACO, Africa's largest film festival. [2] The director took away a few awards for the film. Nigerien Press Agency, [3], [4]
Visions du Reél Another significant international documentary film festival. ScreenDaily

etc...

I'm aware interviews are moot when its comes to establishing notability, but here's an interview with the director, published in Le Point: [5]

Here's an review by Davide Abbatescianni, a member of FIPRESCI who also contribtues to Variety: [6]

It might not meet GNG, but I think many of these African cinema article should be evaluated on their own merits, taking into account the infrastructure of many of these countries, as well as the so-called geographical bias on Wikipedia. Zinder's a pretty significant production for a country with only one cinema. Perhaps we can apply the third point of Wikipedia:Notability_(films)#Inclusionary_criteria:

The film was successfully distributed domestically in a country that is not a major film producing country, and was produced by that country's equivalent of a "major film studio." Articles on such a film should assert that the film in question was notable for something more than merely having been produced, and if any document can be found to support this, in any language, it should be cited.

If you come to the conclusion that the film is notable/of value and revert the redirect, I will definitely be expanding the article a bit. Mooonswimmer 14:06, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:George Negroponte

Hello, Mooonswimmer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:George Negroponte, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jashmir for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jashmir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jashmir until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

NabéTrath (talk) 06:37, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]