User talk:Thatguyflint

If you feel that I have reverted an edit or issued a warning in error, please click here and let me know. I am human, and I do make mistakes. Please don't interpret an error on my part as a personal attack on you. It's not, I promise. I ask you to simply bring it to my attention; I am always open to civil discussion. (I will respond on your talk page.) Thank you.

re: your message

Hi Thatguyflint, I've left a reply to your message on my talk page -- Marek.69 ^talk 04:55, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

link to Batman: The Animated Series

hi there. i'm translating that page to russian. thanks for turning back my link for russian page :) now i've made it less bold. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kurt Wagner (Russia) (talk • contribs) 08:33, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind words. Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 21:10, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Rollback

Following your recent request at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback, and the edits you've made since, I've re-reviewed your contributions, and would be happy to grant you rollback if you still want it. Let me know if you do, and I'll set the permission for you. Keep up the good work! —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 13:26, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 20:28, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback correctly, and for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks.  —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 17:05, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thank you for your outstanding work reverting vandalism. MMS2013 23:16, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

The Little Orphan

I have requested semi-protection for The Little Orphan. Since you have reverted several times already, you may wish to chime in here. Thanks! — SpikeToronto 22:13, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Cal Ripken, Sr. Collegiate Baseball League

Anything we can do about the guy who's been sitting on the page recently? I'm not well-versed in Anti-Vandalism techniques, so I don't know if I was right to request semi protection for this article. It's been getting out of hand with this particular vandal. Is there any way to block his IP? Thanks for the help with reverts, by the way. Kithira (talk) 02:03, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi Kithira! I am also fairly new, so I will let you know my understanding of the situation; however, you may want to ask someone more experienced if I am correct in my assumptions...This type of situation seems to be first dealt with by reverting the edits in question, and then warning the vandal on their talk page. I have done so here. It seems as though this particular user is headed for blocking, but may decide to cease their unconstructive edits. If the user does not, semi or full protection may be decided upon by an administrator. Thank you for your interest in and help with the encyclopedia, and I f I can help any more, please don't hesitate to contact me.Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 19:54, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

You guys are idiots. My page was clear, concise, and accurate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Huhnad (talk • contribs) 20:12, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

While your edits may very well have been "clear, concise and accurate", they had no place in the Cal Ripken, Sr. Collegiate Baseball League article. If you would like to make a page about the "Patrick Malone Donation Fund", there are methods in place for that purpose.--Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 20:33, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the assist, ThatGuy. Kithira (talk) 23:01, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user talk page

Appreciate it. --Tomwsulcer (talk) 21:50, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

No prob!--Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 21:52, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Regarding Steven Seagal

THE TRUTH IS NOT VANDALISM - Steven Seagal WAS rejected by the OCSD for his ties to organized crime and he NEVER attended ANY police academy in California - EVER. (unsigned by 96.41.73.122)

Hello! The information you placed on my talk page and the article may very well be true, in which case your edit dispute would be with user:NeilN, not me. What I reverted was the contention that the subject was an "alleged" actor, which is clearly not true. Whether or not he is an effective actor is certainly up for debate :), but he is definitely an actor. You can use the talk page for the article to discuss that. Thank you for your interest in Wikipedia, and I hope you do not let this incident prevent you from contributing constructively.Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 23:26, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

HOLY SHIT I'M SORRY!

GOD, I'm a retard. I am SO SORRY!!!! J.delanoy^gabs_adds 04:22, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

*gives J.delanoy an odd look for the above remark* Anyway. About the IPs that keep attacking J.delanoy's page, don't bother warning them. They're all a super-banned user or his cronies, and warning them is just wasting your and the server's time. They're not going to stop. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 05:10, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

		The Userpage Shield
		Placed in recognition of this editor's efforts in watching over User talk:tide rolls. Tiderolls 05:12, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

I don't know if you're an award type person...feel free to delete this if you think it frivolous. I do want to thank you for the reverts on my page. Keep up the good work Tiderolls 05:12, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Exor674 & this edit

I believe the user was reverting vandalism here. SMC (talk) 15:26, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Yes, between my eyes seeing the vandalism and my finger pushing the button!Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 15:29, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

I know exactly what you mean! Ah, RC patrol. SMC (talk) 15:30, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Collisions are awesome, heh! Exor674 (talk) 15:32, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Knock off the bogus vandalism warnings

I sent the message to the wrong user, I put it on the Talk page of the person who had edited the article just prior to me, and not to your Talk page. I'm trying to fix it, you keep putting up these bogus vandalism warnings on my Talk page and I don't appreciate it. 99.166.95.142 (talk) 17:13, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello 99.166.95.142. Please accept my humble apologies for reverting your edits. My laptop's touchpad is extremely sensitive. Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 17:13, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Excellent

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For your excellent counter Vandalism edits...  arun  talk  18:44, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

140.180.18.151

Thank you for dealing with 140.180.18.151 for Same-sex marriage ; might I ask you to handle the 3RR filing on him? He's well over for the day, but with a wiggling baby on my knee, I'm too distracted to figure out how to post the diffs. - Nat Gertler (talk) 20:40, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind words, NatGertler. However, since the issue is controversial, even contentious maybe, and that would be the first 3RR report I have done, I must regretfully defer to you or someone else that has more experience in these matters. Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 21:36, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

hi

you made a mistake at the one part. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.14.176.102 (talk) 17:14, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

what

you sent me a message. i dont get it{{{{{{}}}}}}

Message from 142.23.72.178

DUDE i put caman mcelligot is scarfaces biggest fan and you erased it! thats the truth and its a good fact whyed you remove it man? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.23.72.178 (talk) 21:20, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello, 142.23.72.178. While your contention that "caman mcelligot is scarfaces biggest fan" may very well be true, it is not encyclopedic. I am placing a "Welcome" here below this message, which contains links to many helpful pages, so that you may better understand Wikipedia's policies, and contribute constructively. Thanks for your interest in Wikipedia, and happy editing! Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 21:31, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Bye and Happy Christmas

Please accept my advanced Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.I will not be able to wish you on those days as I will be taking a Wiki break for one month starting tomorrow. Also wishing you a Happy editing.. :)  arun  talk  06:49, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for your instant vandalism protection work on "Perspectives II High School" I really appreciate it —Preceding unsigned comment added by Slocking (talk • contribs) 21:34, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

You are very welcome. Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 21:36, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

adding phone number for Dish Network

Why will you not let me add the phone Number for Dish Network Ordering? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.184.12.135 (talk) 22:52, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello, 74.184.12.135! I have removed your edits which placed a phone number due to the following: Wikipedia is not a directory (Entry #3). I thank you for your interest in and helpful though slightly misguided edits to Wikipedia, and hope that you will stay and help us. You may wish to read the welcome page for more tips on what is and isn't appropriate here. Also, please remember to sign any posts with four tildes (~~~~), so that other users can know who posted and where to respond. Thanks again, happy editing! Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 23:07, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Yoko Ono

man im just spreading the truth —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.127.213.170 (talk) 01:41, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Not.Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 18:40, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Zebulon Pike

You reverted a change I made, which was trying to establish just exactly who "Calhoun" was. This was the only mention of him in the article and so I tried to draw attention to this error. I just made some more changes in an attempt to discover who "Calhoun" is.

Regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.12.252.113 (talk) 04:10, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello, 165.12.252.113! Thanks for not taking my revert badly! If I might make a suggestion: The article's talk page might be a more appropriate place for questions and comments of that sort. By being bold one would probably revert or undo the edit, and then post the question on the talk page. It would probably be a good idea to use the edit summary to let anyone know that you felt the information had no place in the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 04:21, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

ADMIN-bubby9534

Are you a wikipedia administrator? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bubby9534 (talk • contribs) 18:32, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello Bubby9534. No, I am not an administrator. I hope that my revert was not taken as overstepping my bounds by you or anyone else. The part that is bothering me is that I can't seem to find the revert in question. I believe this is due to the page having been deleted. I was using Huggle, and therefore I think I can safely say that I determined the edit to at least look like vandalism, but without seeing it I can't say for certain. Is it the deletion you are wondering about? Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 18:41, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

If it is indeed the deletion you are wondering about, you may wish to ask User:SchuminWeb or User:Acroterion. It looks to me like Acroterion thought of the article as a test edit and SchuminWeb speedily deleted it. Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 18:46, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Bubby9534 (talk) 19:16, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Bubby9534 (talk) 19:16, 14 December 2009 (UTC)Hi!Bubby9534 (talk) 19:16, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

sorry

hey you deleted something that was relevant

I recently added a few sentences to the article puppy, that i and others, would find relevant. I would like an explantation. I feel this was rude and uncalled for, thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mendelson1123 (talk • contribs) 23:52, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Not. Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 23:56, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Upon further reflection, I have decided that it would be more wikipedia-like for me to address your concerns. I also believe that puppies are cute and adorable, but I don't think the information is encyclopedic. Please refrain from placing this type of information. You may wish to read the welcome page for more pointers. I apologize if you found my edit to be rude and uncalled for. Thanks for your input and happy editing! Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 23:43, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Request

Hello Can I PLEASE add on your November 17th Page that it is my Best friend’s birthday... She is moving away forever tomorrow and i told her i could get her name on Wikipedia... Please. Even if it only lasts for an hour. As long as she sees it, it will make my day. Please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.99.227.26 (talk) 21:22, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Response here Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 21:37, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Patrick Moroney

We have removed all unsourced "negative" material from the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yizhuang87 (talk • contribs) 22:50, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Response here Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 22:54, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

It is not unbiased

I had revised it to exprees only Henry's views. The reason why I did is because the existing views were not his own and were biased in nature. Please edit the content to express his views and not that of his enemies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Doc1st (talk • contribs) 23:12, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Every single comment in the "views" contains peoples opinions of Henry morris views. I say that they are his views just to let people know that they are his and not someone elses. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Doc1st (talk • contribs) 23:22, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Response here Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 23:48, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Doc1st (talk) 23:52, 19 December 2009 (UTC) Hi there, I cant figure out how to get to the talk page, this is my first time using wikipedia. I was looking at henry morris's page and thought it was a shame how they had done that to him. I just want it to express his views not peoples criticism. Doc1st (talk) 23:52, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

To Doc1st: every WP page has "discussion" tab at the top. Clicking it would bring you to the talk of that page (unless it is a talk page already :-). Materialscientist (talk) 23:54, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

okay. Doc1st (talk) 23:55, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Regarding this edit

okay —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.167.90.228 (talk) 19:51, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Ireland page

Hi there,

This is most bizarre. Someone came in and blanked the Ireland page; I reverted it and logged off. But I just looked at the history and it looks like I inserted all sorts of foulness. Nonconstructive is putting it mildly. I don't often edit WIkipedia, and would certainly not spend my time doing this sort of editing.

Anyway, I'll change my password in case someone is editing using my username.

Cheers,

Declan —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmccabe (talk • contribs) 01:42, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Regarding reversion

I'm more impressed that on Boxing Day night you've nothing better to do than moderate Wikipedia. My thoughts are with you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.0.154.147 (talk) 01:31, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Funny. Someone with nothing better to do than vandalize, comments about me having nothing better to do than revert it...LOL! Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 01:36, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Rick Rude

I honestly believe that I saw Rick Rude in Knoxville the other day. He was working at the Piggly Wiggly. I may have been incorrect in my assumption that his wife and children left him, but after packing on roughly 80 lbs, the career change and what not, it wasn't a stretch of the imagination to guess (perhaps rightly?) that they did. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.169.234.107 (talk) 02:15, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

i edited something on the jersey devil page..

i put "the jersey devil is my 4th grade teacher" bcuz my frend dared me 2.. i thought it was pretty funny so i did it.. btw my 4th grade teacher was really mean!!! so u understand my pain... also i read other complants, and you said "wikipedia is for history, not for fun" or something like that!! well thats boring... if people read what i said, they are gonna know an unauthorized person of wikipedia inserted that! what's the harm of doing that?

Response here Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 03:18, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

I have a question.

Hello, As you told me before, I should not put jokes or anything fun on Wikipedia. Well, I typed in "mean teachers" in the search box, and it gave me a list of "Drake and Josh episodes". I just want to know how to make a page for "mean teachers". Do users make pages, or does the head person of Wikipedia make the pages?

P.S. My teacher was way meaner than the Jersey Devil! She banged her head on the black board, and broke it! She slappes us with books, hard-cover books! She broke my thumb! She called my 4-page, hand- written essay "stupid nonsense"!!!

Response here Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 03:35, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Regarding Luke Ford (actor)

you have made a grave mistake, correct your errors immediately. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.1.186.172 (talk) 21:42, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Response here Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 21:55, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Re: Fuck

You're no fun:(

Response here Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 18:22, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Stop removing my edits

Several words like "right-winger" , advocate of conspiracy theories etc etc. are loaded/biased words that are in violation of the Wiki rule of editing conduct. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.107.6.240 (talk) 01:53, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Response here Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 02:06, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

EDITS TO BOWLAND PAGES

There were ten manors in the Liberty of Bowland, not nine. The manor of Hammerton - which was omitted - was forfeited by Sir Stephen Hammerton in 1536 and regranted by the Crown in 1545. Please have faith in my edits - I am running a Cambridge University research project on the manorial history of Bowland!

Response here Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 10:02, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

THANKS FOR YOUR SWIFT RESPONSE

You're a star! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.129.106.167 (talk) 10:03, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks...

...for reverting my user page. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 22:26, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Regarding The Last Continent

You sure made a fast evaluation of the "constructiveness" of the changes to "The Last Continent."12.111.236.135 (talk) 17:44, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Response here Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 17:57, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on the Generation X page. Your contribution is appreciated. --CreativeSoul7981 (talk) 18:15, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Sheldon Cooper

Regarding my edit http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheldon_Cooper?diff=336462598 on the Sheldon Cooper article, it was not vandalism. I was just changing a few sentences that I obviously left unchanged and incomplete, due to the fact that I revised and heavily edited the article.

For instance, the sentence

"Sheldon embraces his genius fully and is not ashamed of sharing his interest in admitting he does not mind sharing details of his life that Leonard finds embarrassing, such as a common activity being Klingon Boggle."

is obviously redundant and incomplete. I just wanted to remark

"Sheldon embraces his genius fully and is not ashamed of admitting his interests" (which may be unconventional)

Also, the sentence about his clothing is reworded, but in no way is vandalized.

In my opinion this does not constitute vandalism. I will revert your edits. 189.235.173.9 (talk) 23:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Response here Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 08:32, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Scuse me.

Why are you taking down my post. They are very accurate. I regret to inform you your wiki account will now be deleted for obstruction to user posts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.76.202.71 (talk) 22:00, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Response here. Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 01:28, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

From 98.112.149.31

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Electric Ladyland, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

   * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
   * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
   * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Electric Ladyland was changed by 98.112.139.31 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-12-10T01:44:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 01:44, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

I hope this was a mistake on your behalf. I'm not claiming responsibility for this, as I had no part. In any case, thanks for wasting my time... douche. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.112.139.31 (talk) 02:03, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Response here Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 00:51, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Wrong Ip/Someone using proxy.

Hello, you gave me a "Last Warning" about "London Array" However i have not actually edited this page, and thus i believe it to be someone using a proxy that has the same IP as mine(as i have an Ip that resets every time i turn my computer on) And thus, i believe an error is in place. thanks for your time. --78.151.132.119 (talk) 03:04, 25 January 2010 (UTC) ≠

Edit on Clothespin

I have never edited that article, not sure why I got the msg? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.149.92.139 (talk) 23:16, 10 April 2010 (UTC) u have no right thisa biblicul story u are incorrect evidence has been found that there was a moses and please research your bible stories befor u post thank u —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.208.194.237 (talk) 04:25, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:03, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

hello

Was willst du  ? Das is doch keine Wandalismus ! Lass mich bitte ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.149.194.12 (talk) 19:27, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

I note that you reverted a correct change to the president of this society with an edit summary that implied vandalism, and incorrectly warned the editor for vandalism. The editor has not edited since. Please be more careful in future, and if you use rollback, be warned that it can be removed for such mistaken usage. Espresso Addict (talk) 01:28, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

ugly duckling edit

didn't come from me74.240.219.55 (talk) 23:14, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Bigg Boss 4

I made some changes today, namely regarding the nominations and you have reverted those. I would like to inform you that my source is the episode itself, which is officially available by ColorsTv on their YouTube Channel Please refer to the October 11th episode before reverting the changes.

YouTube Channel - >http://www.youtube.com/user/colorstv

October 11th episode, Part 1 -> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxm_w3eMOck

Wiki Page that i am talking about -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bigg_Boss_%28Season_4%29

I have made the changes again, please do not revert them now as they are very accurate.

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dexteryash5 (talk • contribs) 22:34, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Response here. Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 22:44, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Operation Entebbe

The change I made significantly increased the readability of the article. Linking to henry kissinger (as he had not been mentioned before) allows the reader of the article to more closely follow the article, as it becomes rather disjunct at that point in presenting multiple opinions (an evil of any writing of that style)

Thanks

Response here. Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 19:47, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Roger Blackwell

This guy is a convicted felon. It's not a controversy.

http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/ohio/ohsdce/2:2008cv00168/121013/2/

Also, in his wikipedia article, there is a headline that says "insider trading conviction". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.185.109.80 (talk) 15:40, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Response here Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 19:57, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:94.99.227.26/sandbox

A tag has been placed on User:94.99.227.26/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Kumioko (talk) 11:13, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Shared IPs

In my country (New Zealand) we are assigned our IP. I was told I was making edits on a page that I had never seen before.

This isn't good as you're wrongfully telling people they're be unconstructive.

Who knows the number of times you've sent messages on user talk to people who just got assigned the IP? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.180.98.132 (talk) 14:33, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Thatguyflint. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Thatguyflint. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Thatguyflint. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saadallah Agha al-Qalaa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Qanun (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:19, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Fixed!!Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 20:23, 11 June 2019 (UTC)