Jump to content

User talk:FlightTime/Archive 32

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< User talk:FlightTime

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 12:14, 5 March 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
← Archive 31 Archive 32 Archive 33 →


Now that takes me back

Archived discussions

The following page is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Hello FT. I saw this and I had to stop by and say matter of fact it's all dark :-) Cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 16:52, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MarnetteD: OMG I love Floyd, I saw them 24 April 1975. Thanx for stopping by, you are always welcomed on this page. Hope you are doing well. Cheeers, - FlightTime (open channel) 16:57, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That is great FT!! I was not lucky enough to see them live but they sure were a big part of my formative years. This t-shirt just gets truer and truer as time goes by. I'm hanging in there even though shoveling snow gets to be a bigger pain as I get older. Best regards. MarnetteD|Talk 17:03, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
LOL I need that shirt :P - FlightTime (open channel) 17:05, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

About your recent revert on Bruce dickson's page

TROLL This discussion/section is closed

The following discussion/section is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion/section.

Hey Flight time, i noticed you removed Special:diff/889746080 this edit by me here. You gave the reason WP:Fan Cruft but you should know that really less people know that he is actually the pioneer and this is a really important information. Adding to that Freddie Mercury has the same kind of statement but no one ever tried to touch it. Is there some kind of discrimination going against Heavy metal vocalists? You are a well known editor so you should really abstain from this kind of unjust reverts using that trash called twinkle. Regards 2405:204:A38D:A93:0:0:64C:28B1 (talk) 15:41, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Don't care about your personal opinions. - FlightTime (open channel) 15:44, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Are you intoxicated? This ain't my personal opinion. This is the Famous People articles' critic's opinion. This is the opinion of even unsound minded people who have ever heard of heavy metal. Why shouldn't I say that? You are caring about your personal opinion. And please maintain civility. Regards 2405:204:A38D:A93:A891:1A39:6B2F:8F24 (talk) 15:48, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Mark St. John

This discussion/section is closed

The following discussion/section is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion/section.

You're accusing me of "dispuptive edits" and threaten me with being blocked because I'm reverting disruptive edits? What are you talking about? The edits I reverted were/are disruptive and repeated. I noted that on the edit summary (Sellpink (talk) 10:28, 29 March 2019 (UTC))[reply]

How was this not specific:"There was quite a period of time elapsed between St.John's assault and his subsequent death. No connection was ever established and the coroner rule his death as a brain hemorrhage from an amphetamine overdose" Why would you revert this? (Sellpink (talk))

@Sellpink: Why are you removing the {{cn}} templates without fixing the issue ? - FlightTime (open channel) 10:33, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I was removing disruptive and repeated requests for citation and your response is to threaten me with blocking? I was very specific as to why I removed these:"There was quite a period of time elapsed between St.John's assault and his subsequent death. No connection was ever established and the coroner ruled his death as a brain hemorrhage from an amphetamine overdose." That is factually accurate and negates the previous weasel wording. What is your rationale??? Sellpink (talk) 10:37, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
How is a {{Citation needed}} template disruptive ? You removing it without providing a citation is disruptive. You claim "There was quite a period of time elapsed between St.John's assault and his subsequent death" and I say prove it - FlightTime (open channel) 10:41, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ummm...well, the article itself indicates that St. John was assaulted on September 14, 2006 and that he died on April 5, 2007. which is nearly seven months after the assault. Because of your reversion, it reads as if happened directly or shortly after the assault. My wording noting several months had passed was accurate. Now it reads as vague and unclear. (Sellpink (talk) 10:50, 29 March 2019 (UTC))[reply]
@Sellpink: Well, instead of just removing the template, without fixing it, why don't you start a discussion on the talk page and discuss your concerns. Also, you've been here almost 6 years and still do not know how to use a talk page ? Do us all a favor and review WP:THREAD and WP:INDENT
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

A message from Devereux Eoin

Hello, thank you for your message. I will add a reference to my edit. I wrote the sleeve notes for the Cranberries debut album re-issue and I am fully familiar with their early history. Eoin Devereux Eoin (talk) 18:44, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A message from Jean Groom

Hi Mark,

I was wondering, what is the basis for your 'Undo' of my edit?

I haven't edited or posted on Wikipedia before, but I did check the guidelines and don't understand what policy I may have inadvertently violated. I believe I did correctly cite a legitimate reference.

Will you please explain?

Thanks, Jean

@FlightTime: Jean Groom (talk) 03:18, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jean Groom: Because it's not notable. You can, however start a discussion on the article's talk page and seek consensus for inclusion. - FlightTime (open channel) 14:43, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. I thought it would qualify as notable because, in addition to the reference I cited (The Hill), it was reported on (just yesterday and today) by Time, USA Today, Fox News, NBC, MSN, CNN, Washington Post, Salon.com, Huffpost, People, Daily Mail.... I can't list them all, just google "McCain wedding Denise" if you like.

@Jean Groom: Just because a claim can be reliably sourced, doesn't make it notable. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:21, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deepsea Challenger

Hi FlightTime

For your information, I reverted 150.199.206.26's edits on the Deepsea Challenger article because they left the following unresolved edit - "oper team members hail from Sydney's cave-diving fraternity including Allum himself with many years' cave-diving experience." Please reply here as I now watching this talk page. Regards Cowdy001 (talk) 19:17, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indexing my article

Hi FlightTime , do you have the power to 'index' my article so it shows up in google or other search engines ? Be patient with me..I'm new to this thing. Here is my article that I'd like to be 'indexed' -> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willie_Haggart

Regards

49.183.61.5 (talk) 03:16, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No one has that power, it's done by the search engines not Wikipedia and it's not your article, nobody owns anything on this site. - FlightTime (open channel) 09:42, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@FlightTime: then is the following false new articles are automatically marked "noindex" until they have been checked a little by an experienced editorItalic text'  ?

I've never seen that before, but that would be the issue. I have marked the article as patrolled. - FlightTime (open channel) 02:34, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@FlightTime: Thank you..I appreciate it — Preceding unsigned comment added by AROO8 (talk • contribs) 09:57, March 31, 2019 (UTC)

Star Trek TMP

What would be a good source of placing The Motion Picutre in 2273?

Sorry, I have no idea. - FlightTime (open channel) 12:22, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How about Memory Beta? Surprised you responded so quickly.73.204.73.223 (talk) 12:25, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The best way to do this is to start a discussion on the article talk page and editors who regularly watch that page can help. - FlightTime (open channel) 12:30, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have no problem with those, someone else might though. Happy editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 12:41, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Aorrpdo

This discussion/section is closed

The following discussion/section is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion/section.

Your first instincts were correct. Anyone reporting Bonadea to AIV can be assumed to be Nsmutte and should be blocked on sight. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:11, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Damn, you're quick. I posted a cmt on thier talk. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:12, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just adding some links for future reference.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Mark Cuban

I would like to ask: What is notable and not notable as far as you deleting edits that you deem not notable. What is not notable to you might be notable to someone else. Thank you Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by TwinMosia (talk • contribs) 17:01, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. That's why we have discussions. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:10, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Go play somewhere else. This discussion/section is closed

The following discussion/section is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion/section.

Ok, I guess only certain names can be added, depends on the musician. Also your not an admin, so you can't block people on here. Matt Campbell (talk) 01:20, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You're right Mr. Campbell, I'm not an Admin and I can not block anyone, however you keep editwarring and an Admin will block you. All I'm asking is for you to provide a source for your claim. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:24, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Why do I need source for that? Anyone is welcome to edit articles. Matt Campbell (talk) 01:33, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I can see why you've been blocked twice already. Go away. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:36, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

A message from 62.107.212.221

Hey!

I was wondering why you reverted my change on the "Beggars Banquet" article? According to several sources, it is Brian Jones playing the acoustic guitar part on "Parachute Woman". What knowledge do you have that would qualify you to say otherwise? Not to be rude or anything, just curious!

Peace.

62.107.212.221 (talk) 19:20, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Because it wasn't sourced. I didn't say that the information was incorrect, You left an edit summary that said According to several sources, Brian played the acoustic guitar part on "Parachute Woman". There are none more credible sources to disprove this, I merely asked you to please provide one. - FlightTime (open channel) 19:26, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A message from Joeythedesigner

@FlightTime:

Hiya again - logged in to my account.

According to the book "The Rolling Stones: Beggars Banquet" by Alan Clayson, Brian is credited with 'guitar'. And since Keith is credited with 'slide guitar' the only other guitar left to be written off is the acoustic.

a short preview of this section of the book...

Joeythedesigner (talk) 19:35, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Joeythedesigner: I don't need to reference here, it needs to go in with your edit. Also if you have an account, be careful how and what you edit per WP:LOGOUT - FlightTime (open channel) 19:39, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

About my requested move.

Hello there! My edit was just an April's Fools Day joke. And I was planning to close it in 5 minutes anyway. I got the name from WP:NOTMOVED, and I was curious people who react to the joke. I apologise if I was being a bit disruptive. It's just that it's seems to be a bit of a tradition on Wikipedia. Have a nice day! The Duke 20:38, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@The Duke of Nonsense: Why don't you comment here. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:39, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I apologise, this is my first (and probably only) year of doing this. I hope you have a good day! The Duke 20:42, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@The Duke of Nonsense: No problem, I'm just kinda worked up about this every year. Have a fun day. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:43, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Duke of Nonsense has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Here's a cookie for my troubles! I hope you don't have to deal with severe cases of April Fools! Thanks again! The Duke 20:49, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Way You Make Me Feel A message from MizButlah

Are you saying that I need to reference where I got the info regarding their names? That is what I changed -- I added Brice's real name, Clarence, and I removed "Hunter" from Field's name, since he wrote the song as Philip Field. I don't understand your objection.

MizButlah (talk) 22:14, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MizButlah: You made a change to existing content, that infers the the content you changed was wrong, so you have to prove it with a third party reliable source to be included with the change you made. See WP:BURDEN. - FlightTime (open channel) 22:44, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks! MizButlah (talk) 22:54, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A message from Joeythedesigner

@FlightTime:

I did what you said I had to do, and provided a source for my claim about Brian Jones' contribution. What's wrong with that, why did you revert it this time? I really don't get it. The source is even listed above the personnel with the other sources.


Joeythedesigner (talk) 06:06, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Joeythedesigner: I've restored your edits. - FlightTime (open channel) 15:22, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A message from 49.183.61.5

@FlightTime:

Why are removing information on the new Rammstein single and album?

Userboxes

Hi @FlightTime: Would you be able to create two userboxes for me. Thanks. scope_creepTalk 17:40, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep: Yes absolutely. Let me know what you want and give me a couple days and I leave you a link to them. Sorry for the late response, but been kinda busy IRL. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 08:22, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A message from Mahri8

the run time for wizard of oz is 102 minutes and 7 seconds having just watched with my family Mahri8 (talk) 15:15, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mahri8: That's a newer release. We use the original release time. - FlightTime (open channel) 15:18, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Taras Bulba-Borovets

Greetings. You have made a revert in this article: [1] to the version of 23:22, 31 March 2019‎ , but shortly before that, extensive changes were made to the article by the just unblocked IP-user with the long history of disruptive behavior. I have opened the sockpuppet investigation: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/73.16.107.72 How about making a revert to the previous version: 14:47, 26 March 2019‎ by Yulia Romero, until the situation is resolved? Undoubtedly useful edits (corrections of typos, archive links, etc.} I will restore immediately.--Nicoljaus (talk) 09:07, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@FlightTime: Can I regard your silence as a sign of consent?--Nicoljaus (talk) 00:45, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline for Rush

{{Talkback}}

Hey, I figured I should notify you in case you had any opinion or input you wanted to provide, in relation to your recent revert on the Rush article. I do agree with you that discussion on the timeline editing is needed at this point, and I hope we can all come to some sort of consensus. Thanks!

Lord Gorbachev (talk) 21:27, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Lord Gorbachev: Sorry, I have no input on that matter, TBH I do not like timelines, but I do know that any changes to them should have consensus first. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 21:29, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@FlightTime: That's understandable. Thanks for bringing that to our attention though. Out of curiosity, what's the result in the case no one contributes to the discussion? If it means no edits can be made, or if no consensus is to fruition, what is the basis that we have to stick to what is currently presented, considering there has been many edits already without consensus? Perhaps we'd then better delete the entire thing? Or would that require consensus as well? -Lord Gorbachev (talk) 21:41, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Lord Gorbachev: There're 693 page watchers on that page, I'm sure someone will have something to say :P and in the event no one responds then I guess WP:NOCONSENSUS would need to be followed. I would, if that happens, point to your discussion attempt in the edit summary of any changes made in relation to the timeline. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:57, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See also

Hello. What is the reasoning for a condescending "Really ?" at the end of this edit summary? You can disagree with the addition (I do not care greatly if the link is included or not), but there is no need for incivility. Hrodvarsson (talk) 01:58, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Hrodvarsson: Sorry to offend, I just couldn't believe that someone would think that's that bit of trivia was encyclopedic, I mean, this isn't Ripley's Believe It or Not!. - FlightTime (open channel) 02:10, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It is a similar event in that both are cases of musicians shot to death by deranged fans, with the date coincidence an extra detail that has been discussed by RS. I added the link in a see also section, which is for tangentially related articles, not the article's body. This caused such disbelief that you could not help but leave a condescending edit summary? Hrodvarsson (talk) 02:20, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No matter how you rationalize it, it's still non-notable trivia. - FlightTime (open channel) 02:24, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Userboxes

Coolio @FlightTime: Yip, Infoboxes. Sorry to take an age to get back. I'm looking for two for Building encyclopaedia's since 1736 in green and ENTx Myer Briggs results. Couldn't find that one, in Red, so I get Yellow, Blue, Green, Red in a list. Thanks. scope_creepTalk 02:00, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The table of contents on this page

Why is it sideways? I'm guessing that it's intentional, but I don't understand how you did it. Clovermoss (talk) 02:31, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Clovermoss: Add this code <div style="{{#invoke:RexxS|wobble}} float:left">__TOC__</div> to your talk page. - FlightTime (open channel) 02:53, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting. I was just curious about how it worked, I had no plans to use it on my own talk page. Using it would probably drive me nuts! Clovermoss (talk) 02:57, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ACC

I've restored your ACC access per your request at WT:ACC. Please resubscribe to the list. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:10, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why I do this

Hi FlightTime. I saw your edit comment asking "why do you do this". When I researched how to make a full reference, as opposed to just a URL surrounded by 2 ref tags, I went to this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_news I noticed the vertical format and I copy-pasted that instead of the horizontal format. I personally find it much easier to work with, visually. That's really the only reason. Cheers. SteamboatPhilly (talk) 17:49, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@SteamboatPhilly: Ok, I just think it takes up more space than needed, but to each their own. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 18:01, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that's why it's easier to read, and space isn't really a concern when it's only in the edit mode that you see it, isn't it? SteamboatPhilly (talk) 18:11, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A message from KNHaw

Thanks for fixing my erroneous revert on Steven Tyler. I did not double check and am glad you did. KNHaw (talk) 05:22, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@KNHaw: Not a problem. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 05:23, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Gulshan Kumar convicted murderer "extradited to Bangladesh"?

Please check the reports before making changes.

Malaiya (talk) 23:10, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx for fixing that. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 23:37, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A message from 115.64.244.198

Syd Barrett and Rick Wright did share a flat in Richmond, so it was probably a misdirected edit. 115.64.244.198 (talk) 08:05, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I never said they didn't, my concern is WP:PROVEIT. This is an Encyclopaedia, we don't post claims just because someone says it's true. Please provide a third party reliable source to support your claim. - FlightTime (open channel) 14:27, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bug in ReFill?

In this edit you accidentally deleted part of the link from https://www.elitemodel.fr/en/women/mainboard/1913-stella_maxwell.web to http://www.elitemodel.fr/. Do you think it could be a bug in the tool? --GRuban (talk) 13:47, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, this seems to be the second time in a few days that I'm reverting something you did (once on Commons). Please be assured it's a coincidence, not a vendetta, and is probably just due to the sheer volume of work you're doing, which is impressive, and in general you're doing a very nice job, thank you. --GRuban (talk) 14:02, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@GRuban: I'm sure I didn't make any changes to the scripts changes, so I have to conclude the "error" was made by the tool. Thank you for your heads up and kind words. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 14:22, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A message from Catfurball

@FlightTime: Pumpkin pie is the best pie. Catfurball (talk) 16:20, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Catfurball, Huh ? Don't get the connection, of course I've only had one cup of joe so far :P - FlightTime (open channel) 16:38, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@FlightTime: I need a userbox that says, Pumpkin pie is the best pie.

I need a userbox that says, I eat Apple pie. Catfurball (talk) 21:22, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Catfurball: First a couple of things 1. Please just add new comments to this section, there's no need to start a new discussion/section when commenting on the same subject. 2. There is never a need to ping {{reply to|FlightTime}} when adding a cmt on that user's talk page, any new addition to a users talk page, automatically pings that user. Please see Help:Talk pages. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:30, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A message from 2A01:CB00:32:E900:18C5:F4C2:276A:40FB

This discussion/section is closed

The following discussion/section is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion/section.


Hi, I am fairly confident in what I did. The album I deleted from the timeline was obviously not a studio release. I am pretty sure the change made sense. Thank you 2A01:CB00:32:E900:18C5:F4C2:276A:40FB (talk) 19:43, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your confidence has nothing to do with it, changes to timelines require consensus regardless of what you might think. - FlightTime (open channel) 19:52, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok If you take it with such a tone, here are my thoughts:

- What were the evidence of the previous statement ? ABSOLUTELY NONE. It even said "most likely", clearly showing ITS OWN OPINION

- What did I bring ? A DIRECT LINK TO THE ALBUM IN QUESTION, with detailed liner notes describing the recording

- What should be the consequence ? A CHANGE IN THE STUDIO TIMELINE

As you can see, I don't put forward my own opinion, but provide a reasonable fact in order to correct an obvious MISTAKE on this page

It should be enough to convince any sensible person. Thank you 2A01:CB00:32:E900:18C5:F4C2:276A:40FB (talk) 20:02, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You're not editing "any sensible person" you're editing an Encyclopedia, which means you leave your personal opinions at the door. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:09, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

A message from 65.60.80.229

Do you need reliable sources for the change request I sent? If so, here is Miss Dance Drill Team USA's results on their website.

2018's MDDTUSA results showing Carson Flaggies won 1 Flag Division and Channel Islans won 2 Flag Division http://www.mddtusa.com/downloads/2018/2018%20AWARDS%20Miss%20Dance%20Drill%20Team%20USA%20Nationals.pdf

2019's MDDTSUSA results showing Carson Flaggies (NOT Carson High School) as we are no longer affiliated with Carson High School Please contact Carson High School and speak to Dr. Warren for confirmation. 65.60.80.229 (talk) 01:03, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't need it, but the request does. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:07, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So do I just include it in the request exactly how I sent to you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.60.80.229 (talk) 01:13, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kinda, see Help:Referencing for beginners for the correct formats. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:15, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Untold Truth?

1). TLDR. Tom Holmes, You need to have this discussion on the article's talk page, the revert probably wouldn't of happened if this was posted there instead. Consensus can not be achieved on my talk page, please take your concerns to the article talk page where editors who watch this page and are familiar with the subject matter can voice their opinions, provide sources and all can reach a consensus and improve the article. 2). Please do not use sock puppetry to further your agenda 3). Please review Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility#Font size. Cheers - FlightTime (open channel) 14:32, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

The following discussion/section is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion/section.

Hello, Mr. FlightTime!

Please, let us discuss the reverse of The Untold Truth with you step by step. As you can see the differences between revisions 889741348 and 892962013, you may have notice a few importaint things:

889741348
892962013
  • (m) In revision 892962013, text tracklist has been transferred, (partial supplemented) and styled into Template:Track listing
    • (m) which means the article doesn't quiet look like a stub
to the point

It says "Warning: You take full responsibility for any action you perform using Twinkle. You must understand Wikipedia policies and use this tool within these policies". According to Wikipedia:Reverting, Wikipedia:Assume good faith, Wikipedia:Revert only when necessary, Wikipedia:Free encyclopedia and Wikipedia:Common sense and decision making, I hope we can find the consensus, so I suggest the following:

  1. Point A: to get back to revision 892962013 (made by Tom Holmes) and make the appropriate changes in it.
  1. Point B: to consider/observe the article (both of its versions) by the average person/user/viewer and, from that point of view, leave the best of both versions for further usage.
  1. Point C: to leave current revision, but put appropriate tags and marks.
to the point 2 (personal message)
  • Do not be afraid of big amounts (the number of bytes added to the edits). In the space of this resource, there are many practically empty, forgotten and obviously-needing-to-be-edited articles. Some of which are not even labeled appropriately and which are rarely found purposefully or even accidentally. Sometimes, when there is time and opportunity to make really helpful edits, it just needs to be done, even if it makes up a massive set of useful information and is designed accordingly. Most likely, editing in No Filter 2 was made in this way and splitting up one good (but large) edit does not make sense. (Wikipedia:Ignore all rules)
  • It would be great to also participate in the insides of the article itself.

P.S.: Wikipedia is good and fascinating by the fact that you can get a little distracted from the daily routine by making edits, complementing existing articles, sharing and learning new information. As elsewhere, there are rules that are worth adhering to, because this is its own habitat.

Tom Holmes (talk) 06:01, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

A message from 90.249.55.253

Hi FlightTime you removed my editing on Norman Harris' Wikipedia page however the original information is incorrect and Norman is still alive you can see him on his youtube channel: "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqIPMVkkhwg&t=200s" 90.249.55.253 (talk) 18:16, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You'll need a better reference than youtube for that kind of claim. The article is about a black R&B artist, your video is about a white music store owner. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:33, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A message from Dartman2020

Shows up and knows everything. If I had a nickle for every......

The following discussion/section is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion/section.

You deleted my info for Ronnie Dios first wife and second wife wendy, it is public record Name: Ronald Padavona Gender: Male Marriage Date: 4 May 1963 Marriage Place: Cortland, New York, USA Spouse: Lorett Berardi Certificate Number: 9300 reference:New York State Department of Health; Albany, NY, USA; New York State Marriage Index second marrage

Name: Ronal J Padavona [Ronald J Padavona] Gender: Male Race: White Age: 35 Birth Year: abt 1943 Residence Place: New Canaan, Fairfield, Connecticut, USA Marriage Date: 7 Apr 1978 Marriage Place: New Canaan, Fairfield, Connecticut, USA Spouse: Wendy V Gaxiola Notes: officiator Other Clergyman

REFerance: Connecticut. 1959-77 Connecticut Marriage File. Hartford, Connecticut: Connecticut Department of Public Health.

Dartman2020 (talk) 03:02, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Dartman2020: Well, you need to provide a reference from a reliable third party with your edit, not in an edit summary, not on someone talk page, with the edit, Please review Help:Referencing for beginners for instructions. I am not saying you're incorrect, I'm saying you need to prove it. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 03:07, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You're nothing more than an old troll, dude back off i did my research, look up the info im right.

@Dartman2020: My last help for you, review WP:BURDEN Good bye. - FlightTime (open channel) 03:41, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Permalloy cable.svg

A tag has been placed on File:Permalloy cable.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Matches a common file of the same name (R4), file is the same content (at a higher resolution) so incoming links can be ignored

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DannyS712 (talk) 01:18, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mu-metal cable.svg

A tag has been placed on File:Mu-metal cable.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Matches a common file of the same name (R4), file is the same content (at a higher resolution) so incoming links can be ignored

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DannyS712 (talk) 01:20, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't blank it

I didn't blank it. I was just trying to make it look more good. Mahid Ul Ibad (talk) 20:51, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mahid Ul Ibad: Please make your comments here. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:53, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A message from Rsdaddy141

Hi there!

Sorry about the editing that was done under my name. My 13 year old got my password.lol. Any editing now and in the future will be done properly. Thanks! Rsdaddy141 (talk) 15:15, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The page above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:FlightTime/Archive_32&oldid=1143004497"