Jump to content

Talk:Kareena Kapoor Khan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hipal (talk | contribs) at 16:46, 27 August 2024 (Advert: just looking at lede). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Featured articleKareena Kapoor Khan is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on September 21, 2015.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 14, 2008Good article nomineeListed
July 25, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
May 30, 2009Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 25, 2009Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 23, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
March 2, 2013Featured article candidatePromoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 21, 2018, and September 21, 2022.
Current status: Featured article

Sources

Semi-protected edit request on 16 October 2021

I am an author of recently published book on Kareena Kapoor. From Nazneen to Naina: 20 years of Kareena Kapoor Khan in Bollywood and what that means for India and the rest of the world has been published by Chetna Parkashan in Ludhiana. The book was officially launched on her birthday in 2021 at Chandigarh Press Club. Will appreciate if you can add this information. Gurpreet Singh Radical (talk) 01:18, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: We're not here to promote your book. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:01, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 6 September 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Adumbrativus (talk) 05:26, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kareena KapoorKareena Kapoor KhanMOS:CHANGEDNAME: she has primarily been known as "Kareena Kapoor Khan" for over a decade now, credited as such in all of her films since late 2012, from Talaash to her her latest release, and in magazine covers such as Vogue and Harper's Bazar. She also identifies as such on Instagram Krimuk2.0 (talk) 15:00, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose Just add a section somewhere in the article : ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rubymza (talkcontribs) 23:39, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment MOS:CHANGEDNAME doesn't apply here. The article title guideline is WP:NAMECHANGES, which states that you need to prove that her married name is the most commonly used, as determined by its prevalence in a significant majority of independent, reliable English-language sources. Citing two magazine covers and some movie credits is not enough to prove your point. - Ïvana (talk) 00:02, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's a dozen different sources. How many more would be need? Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:26, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. As Krimuk has already mentioned, she goes by that name, is credited as such in films and it is commonly used by the media. FrB.TG (talk) 08:09, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Semi-protected edit request on 27 June 2024

If karina Kapoor has not accepted islam then why is khan written in surname? 2409:40D5:103C:A76:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 19:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. - FlightTime (open channel) 19:22, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The more than 3000 edits to this article over 11 years since it gained FA status has made it into something that at times resembles a public relations piece more than an encyclopedia article. - Hipal (talk) 23:22, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hipal: How? At least try to be specific. Any particular paragraphs or sentences that you feel might be problematic? Keivan.fTalk 02:49, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Tagging BOLLYWOOD DREAMZ who brought the article to FA status and Krimuk2.0 who recently engaged with the other contributor. Keivan.fTalk 02:52, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for joining the discussion. Please stop removing the tag, which is there to alert others to help. Removing it undermines the goal of improving this article.
A large part of the problem looks to be WP:NEWSORGINDIA.
Looking over the FA version, I'm seeing problems there too.
I think we have WP:FANCRUFT problems, though the NEWSORGINDIA situation certainly drives it.
Focusing on the lede. Most of these problems appear in part in the FA version, and have just gotten worse over time:
It strays from WP:LEDE. It's too long and too detailed.
It has personal information that needs removal or trimming.
There's information that seems very questionable for an encyclopedia article, probably just mirroring the NEWSORGINDIA sourcing, rather than following WP:NOT. --Hipal (talk) 16:46, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]