User talk:Ildiko Dulo

This is Ildiko Dulo's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: St Andrew's Parish Church of Oakington (Cambridgeshire) (September 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Guessitsavis was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A lot of these sources seem to just be you referring to things you looked at while writing this article. You have to actually supply the source, so that someone can check and make sure what you are saying is supported. See WP:CITEHOW. Although generally not required, I'd also like to see in line citations, so that it is easier to verify information. After making corrections, please consider supplying what you consider to be the best 2-3 sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St Andrew's Parish Church of Oakington (Cambridgeshire) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 20:46, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ildiko Dulo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 20:46, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: St Andrew's Parish Church of Oakington (Cambridgeshire) (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm sorry- but we do not permit unpublished sources as references on articles (which includes the research notes and info from the safe). This building may be notable under WP:NBUILD, my honest advice is to cut down the draft content substantially so you focus on only the information which can be backed up by reliable published sources - the content of the draft should be paraphrased from those sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St Andrew's Parish Church of Oakington (Cambridgeshire) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 10:10, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ildiko Dulo it would also be worth reading Wikipedia:No original research, as I believe most of this draft seems to be original research. Qcne (talk) 10:12, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]