Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snik
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Snik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Typical pretensions of grandeur, founded on weak or non-existent material. The sources used and found are plain listings, such as this, advertorials such as this, titled “Get to know Snik, etc” with full support by the record distributor, a report about another artist, e.g. this, or some half-serious aside of a text in reference to sexism in music, e.g. this. The lack of mainstream sources is not an issue, as the artist’s field of music is mostly ignored there, but there is little of anything anywhere. YouTube "success" on its own does not hold water and the fact that the article was curated mostly by kamikaze accounts, such as this one, accounts does not help. -The Gnome (talk) 19:55, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Greece. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:45, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - I can add little to what the nominator has already described. Also note that the article's claim of making the top ten in five different countries applies only to Spotify stats. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:53, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Echoing Doomsdayer520; delete per nom. JSFarman (talk) 16:39, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Per norm -- Robertjamal12 ~🔔 12:00, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
