Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Helvecia sawmill
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- La Helvecia sawmill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:notability and verifiability – a search on google did not give any results about this sawmill (except some photographs uploaded to Commons by the creator of this article). I could not find any mention to this sawmill on San Fernando websites either. The article contains only one proper source. Fma12 (talk) 18:54, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- It could be redirected to San Fernando, Buenos Aires, Fma12 (talk) 19:23, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- The "proper source" is shown on Wikimedia Commons, and it is sufficiently detailed, to keep the article. Pedro Tamagni is mentioned in the lower half of the right column on page 2376 of the Boletín . La Helvecia, owned by Pedro Tamagni, was among the three most important sawmills. NearEMPTiness (talk) 21:13, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Of course the source you show is a reliable one. The question is: is it enough to make this article "notable"? Fma12 (talk) 23:26, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, together with the more recent reception in Boletin, this seems to be the most noteworthy sawmill in the area. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 11:45, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- Of course the source you show is a reliable one. The question is: is it enough to make this article "notable"? Fma12 (talk) 23:26, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- The "proper source" is shown on Wikimedia Commons, and it is sufficiently detailed, to keep the article. Pedro Tamagni is mentioned in the lower half of the right column on page 2376 of the Boletín . La Helvecia, owned by Pedro Tamagni, was among the three most important sawmills. NearEMPTiness (talk) 21:13, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Argentina. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:24, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Seems like a boringly mundane subject which will garner local attention, but no more. Qwirkle (talk) 21:11, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Having reviewed the sources to the best of my ability (I do not speak Spanish) I am thoroughly unconvinced this subject meets the requirements of WP:NCORP, which is intentionally a higher bar than GNG. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I haven't looked into the sources for this but WP:NCORP sounds like the wrong standard to apply to this one - this is a historical building. -- asilvering (talk) 17:43, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- How? The building isn’t highlighted in the article, and it is patently-sky-is-blue much newer than the company is, unless you wanna go all ship of Theseus. Qwirkle (talk) 18:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
