Alger Hiss

Alger Hiss testifying

Alger Hiss (November 11, 1904 – November 15, 1996) was a U.S. State Department official involved in the establishment of the United Nations. He was accused of being a Soviet spy in 1948 and convicted of perjury in connection with this charge in 1950. Evidence revealed after Hiss's conviction has added a variety of information to the case, and the question of his guilt or innocence remains controversial. Some reliable sources have suggested that those who still believe in Hiss's innocence are in the minority of scholarly opinion.

Early life and career

Born in Baltimore, Maryland to Mary Lavinia Hughes and Charles Alger Hiss, Hiss was educated at Baltimore City College high school and Johns Hopkins University, where he graduated Phi Beta Kappa and was voted "most popular student" by his classmates. In 1929, he received his law degree from Harvard Law School, where he was a protégé of Felix Frankfurter, the future Supreme Court justice. Before joining a Boston law firm, he served for a year as clerk to Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. That same year, Hiss married the former Mrs. Priscilla Hobson, who later worked for the Library of Congress.

In 1933, he entered government service, working in several areas as an attorney in President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's New Deal, starting with the Agricultural Adjustment Administration (AAA). Hiss worked for the Nye Committee, which investigated and documented wartime profiteering by military contractors during World War I. He served briefly in the Justice Department.

Both Alger Hiss and his brother Donald Hiss began working in the United States Department of State in 1936. Alger served as assistant to Francis B. Sayre, a son-in-law of Woodrow Wilson, and later became special assistant to the Director of the Office of Far Eastern Affairs and in 1944 became a special assistant to the Director of the Office of Special Political Affairs (OSPA), a policy-making office that concentrated on postwar planning for international organization. He later became the director of OSPA, and, as such, he was executive secretary at the Dumbarton Oaks Conference, which finalized plans for the organization that would become the United Nations.

In 1945, Hiss was a member of the U.S. delegation to the wartime Yalta conference, where the 'Big Three' (Franklin D. Roosevelt, Joseph Stalin, and Winston Churchill) met to coordinate strategy to defeat Hitler, draw the map of postwar Europe and continue with plans to set up the United Nations. Hiss's role at Yalta was limited to work on the United Nations. Hiss led the oppositionto Stalin's proposal for 16 Soviet votes in the UN General Assembly. In the final compromise, the Big Three decided to give Stalin three votes in the General Assembly: Russia, Ukraine, and Belrus (then known as Byelorussia, or White Russia.)

Hiss served as the secretary-general of the United Nations Conference on International Organization (the United Nations Charter Conference) in San Francisco in 1945. Hiss later became the full Director of the Office of Special Political Affairs.

Hiss left government service in 1946 and became president of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, where he served until May 5, 1949.

Accusation of espionage

File:ChambersHUAC1.jpg

August 25, 1948 - Whittaker Chambers testifies before HUAC as Hiss (circled) listens

In an Aug 3, 1948 appearance before the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC), Whittaker Chambers, a senior editor at Time magazine and a former Communist spy turned government informer, accused Alger Hiss of being a member of the Communist Party. Before that date, Chambers had denied that Hiss was a Communist or a spy. Chambers would change his story several times, and he would be forced to testify at the two Hiss trials that he previously committed perjury many times, such as when he testified before a federal grand jury.

Chambers gave varying dates for the time when he broke the Communist party; a point that was to prove important in his accusations against Hiss. For nine years, between September 1, 1939 and November 17, 1948, Chambers on more than two dozen occasions swore or stated that he had left the Party in 1937. The 1938 Party-leaving date only emerged on November 17, 1948, when, for the first time, Chambers swore that he had repeatedly been lying for the previous nine years. It was at that moment that Chambers first produced copies of State Department documents that he said Hiss had given him; the documents were dated 1938.

Prior to Chambers's testimony, the FBI had already come to suspect Hiss of being a Soviet agent. US Ambassador William Bullitt has testified that in 1938 French Prime Minister Édouard Daladier advised him that French intelligence believed both Alger and Donald Hiss were working for Soviet intelligence. The FBI had interviewed Chambers several times since 1942, and in 1945 further evidence corroborating Chambers's story was received from two sources. Elizabeth Bentley, an American spy for the Soviet Union, defected and told the FBI about a Soviet contact in the State Department whom she identified as "Eugene Hiss." The same year, a Russian code clerk named Igor Gouzenko defected to Canada and reported that an unnamed assistant to the U.S. Secretary of State was a Soviet agent. In both cases, researcher Weinstein believes the FBI decided that Alger Hiss was the most likely match..

Alger Hiss voluntarily appeared before HUAC on August 5th to deny being a Communist. Some Committee members had misgivings at first about attacking Hiss, since he had recently served as a senior level official in the State Department.

Congressman Richard Nixon, acting on information he had been secretly receiving from the FBI and Roman Catholic priest John Francis Cronin, pressed the Committee to continue the investigation. After being asked to identify Chambers from a photograph, Hiss indicated that his face "might look familiar" and requested to see him in person. When he later confronted Chambers in a hotel room, with HUAC representatives present, Hiss claimed that he had known Chambers as "George Crosley," and had sublet his apartment to "Crosley" in the mid-1930s. Later, Hiss claimed that he had given "Crosley" an old car, which allegedly ended up in the hands of the American Communist party.

Because Chambers's testimony was given in a congressional hearing, his statements were privileged against defamation suits. Hiss challenged him to repeat his charges in public without the benefit of such protection. After Chambers publicly reiterated his charge that Hiss was a Communist on the radio program Meet the Press, Hiss instituted a libel lawsuit against Chambers.

Chambers responded by now claiming that Hiss had been a spy, and he presented the "Baltimore Documents" on November 17, 1948, which consisted of sixty-five pages of retyped State Department documents, four pages in Hiss's own handwriting of copied State Department cables. Chambers stated that he had obtained these from Hiss in the 1930s; the typed papers having been retyped from originals by Priscilla Hiss on the family's Woodstock typewriter. This typewriter would become a key piece of evidence used to convict Hiss.

Both Chambers and Hiss had denied any act of espionage in their testimony before the HUAC. By introducing the "Baltimore Documents," Chambers admitted that he committed perjury under oath, and opened both Hiss and himself to perjury charges.

On the evening of December 2, 1948, Chambers produced the so-called Pumpkin Papers: five rolls of 35 mm film, two of which contained State Department documents. The film had been hidden in a hollowed-out pumpkin on Chambers's Maryland farm the previous day.

Perjury trials, conviction and after

Alger Hiss in Lewisburg Federal Penitentiary
(Photos courtesy of the Federal Bureau of Prisons)

Hiss was charged with two counts of perjury; the grand jury could not indict him for espionage since the statute of limitations had run out. Chambers was never charged with a crime. Hiss went to trial twice. The first trial started on May 31, 1949, and ended in a hung jury on July 7, 1949. Hiss's character witnesses at his first trial included such notables as future Democratic presidential candidate Adlai Stevenson, Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, and former Democratic presidential candidate John W. Davis. The second trial lasted from November 17, 1949, to January 21, 1950.

At both trials, a key piece of evidence was a typewriter that Hiss presented as one the Hisses had owned at the time of Hiss's alleged espionage work with Chambers. FBI experts testified that matching of the type established that this typewriter had been used to type the Baltimore Documents. Not revealed at the trial was the fact that reconstructing a typewriter to match sample documents was done during World War II.

In the second trial some slight corroboration of Chambers's charge that Hiss was a Communist was given in the form of testimony from Hede Massing, an American ex-Communist who recounted meeting Hiss at a social function in which they both spoke obliquely about their Communist activities. Massing's account has been disputed by several people who were present at the party, and when Massing testified she admitted, "I have a bad memory."

At the second trial, the jury found Hiss guilty on both counts.

The verdict was upheld by the Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court of the United States. Hiss was sentenced to five years imprisonment on January 25, 1950, and served 44 months at the Lewisburg Federal Prison before being released November 27, 1954.

The case heightened public concern about Soviet espionage penetration of the U.S. government in the 1930s and 1940s. As a native-born, well-educated, and highly connected government official, Alger Hiss did not have the profile of a typical spy. Publicity surrounding the case fed the early political career of Richard M. Nixon, helping him move from the U.S. House of Representatives to the U.S. Senate in 1950, and to the Vice Presidency of the United States in 1952. Senator Joseph McCarthy made his famous Wheeling, West Virginia speech two weeks after the Hiss verdict, launching his career as the nation's most famous and notorious anti-communist.

While in prison, Hiss acted as a voluntary attorney, advisor and tutor for many of his fellow inmates. After his release, Hiss, who had been disbarred, worked as a salesman for a stationery company. In 1957 his book In the Court of Public Opinion was published. The book contained detailed arguments against the prosecution's case against him, with particular emphasis on the theory that the typewritten documents traced to his typewriter had been forged. He separated from his first wife Priscilla in 1959, though he did not remarry until after Priscilla's death in 1986. In 1988 he wrote an autobiography, Recollections of a Life. Hiss maintained his innocence and fought his perjury conviction until his death at age 92 on November 15, 1996.

Later evidence, pro and con

Testimony by Nathaniel Weyl

In February 1952, Nathaniel Weyl testified before the McCarran Committee that he had been a member of the Ware group in 1933 and that Alger Hiss was also a member at this time. His testimony corroborated that of Chambers, but Weyl had not testified at Hiss's trial, leaving Chambers as the only witness to testify at first hand that Hiss was a Communist or a spy. By 1952 Hiss had already been convicted, and thus Weyl's belated testimony was relevant only to public opinion. In 1950, after Hiss's conviction, Weyl wrote a book on the history of treason in America. In the chapter of this book that Weyl devoted to the Hiss case, he expressed doubt about Hiss's guilt and made no reference to the personal knowledge about the case that would later be the basis of his testimony before the McCarran Committee. This apparent discrepancy and his failure to come forward as a witness in the Hiss trials have never been explained by Weyl.

Hiss readmitted to Massachusetts bar

On August 5, 1975, Hiss was readmitted to the Massachusetts bar, reinstating his license to practice law. The state's Supreme Judicial Court stated in a unanimous decision that, despite his conviction, he had demonstrated the "moral and intellectual fitness" required to be an attorney.

Evidence of government misconduct at the Hiss trials

In 1975, as a result of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) suits by Hiss and others, Department of Justice documents, consisting of FBI and prosecution records, were released which revealed gross government misconduct in obtaining the Hiss conviction:

• The FBI illegally withheld important evidence from the Hiss defense team, specifically that typewritten documents could be forged. Unknown to the defense, military intelligence operatives In World War II, a decade before the trials, "could reproduce faultlessly the imprint of any typewriter on earth." Forgers from the United States worked In Canada at a location "chosen In part because it could be reached easily by FBI agents"; J. Edgar Hoover himself visited the establishment. One job in which the FBI collaborated called for rebuilding "with all the imperfections . . . [a] typewriter that precisely duplicated the machine In Rome"; It produced "a letter so perfectly forged by matching the imperfections of typewriter keys... that it caused the removal of certain key pro-Nazis in South America."
• With regard to the Woodstock No. 230099 typewriter introduced as evidence by the defense at the trial, the FBI knew that there was an inconsistency between its manufacture date and its serial number but illegally withheld this information from Hiss.
• That the FBI had conducted illegal surveillance of Hiss before and during the trials, including phone taps and mail openings. Also that the prosecution had withheld from Hiss and his lawyers the records of this surveillance, none of which provided any evidence that Hiss was a spy or a Communist.

Hiss files petition for a writ of Coram Nobis

In July 1978 the Hiss defense filed a petition in federal court for a writ of coram nobis, asking that the guilty verdict be overturned due to prosecutorial misconduct. The petition was denied by a federal judge in 1982, and in 1983 the U.S. Supreme court, which by this time contained four Nixon appointees, including Chief Justice Warren E. Burger, William Rehnquist, Harry Blackmun, and Lewis Franklin Powell, Jr. declined to hear the suit.

Remanufactured typewriter theory

At both trials, FBI typewriter experts testified that the Baltimore Documents in Chambers's possession matched samples of typing done by Priscilla Hiss on the Hiss's home typewriter in the 1930s. The Woodstock typewriter that had been owned by the Hisses at this time was presented as evidence by the defense in the trials. The defense investigators had tracked down what they believed was the family's old typewriter on their own, hoping that examination of the actual machine would point up flaws in the FBI's matching of documents. This proved not to be the case, as tests with the typewriter only seemed to confirm the FBI's analysis.

Since the trials, several apparent discrepancies have been noted in the typewriter evidence presented by the prosecution. This includes expert testimony that the typewriter presented in evidence (as Exhibit #UUU) was not the same one that produced earlier typing samples from the Hiss household, expert testimony that Priscilla Hiss was not the typist of the Baltimore Documents, testimony by former Woodstock executives that the serial number of the Exhibit #UUU typewriter was inconsistent with the year when the Hiss typewriter was originally purchased, and expert testimony that the exhibit #UUU typewriter had been tampered with in a way not consistent with professional repair work. These points and others have lead some Hiss defenders to theorize that the Baltimore Documents were forgeries, created by first remanufacturing a typewriter to match existing samples of typed papers from the Hiss household, then using this typewriter to type the Baltimore Documents. According to this theory, the remanufactured typewriter was then planted where Hiss's defense investigators would find it, and it became trial exhibit #UUU.

At the time of the trials, few people suspected that such "forgery by typewriter" was possible. During World War II, J. Edgar Hoover arranged for his own FBI agents to be trained at a British intelligence base where one of the specialties was the remanufacture of typewriters for document forgery. In a 1959 document obtained through an unrelated Freedom of Information Act application, J. Edgar Hoover noted that "To alter a typewriter to match a known model would require a large amount of typewriter specimens and weeks of laboratory work."

Allen Weinstein counter-argued that if the Baltimore Documents were forgeries, it would be an unnecessary risk to arrange for the remanufactured typewriter to be found and introduced as evidence at the trials. The link between the Hiss's typewriter and the Baltimore Documents was testified to on the basis of matching the documents to old typing samples, so the actual typewriter wasn't needed. Professor Irving Younger wrote, "To leave the counterfeit Woodstock lying about for the defense to pick up and examine would serve only to expose the whole scheme to the risk of discovery--and for no reason."

In a 1976 memoir, former White House counsel John Dean alleged that President Nixon's chief counsel Charles Colson told him that Nixon had admitted in a conversation that HUAC had in fact fabricated a typewriter, saying, "We built one on the Hiss case." However, Colson subsequently denied the statement.

Soviet archives

After the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, Alger Hiss petitioned General Dimitry Antonovich Volkogonov, who had become President Yeltsin's military advisor and the overseer of all the Soviet intelligence archives, to request the release of any Soviet files on the Hiss case. Interestingly, both former President Nixon and the director of his presidential library, John H. Taylor, wrote a similar letter, though the actual contents of those letters are not publicly available.

Russian archivists and researchers responded by reviewing their files, and in the fall of 1992 reported back that they had found no evidence that Alger Hiss had ever engaged in espionage for the Soviet Union or any evidence that Hiss was a member of the Communist Party. However, Volkogonov subsequently revealed that he had spent only two days on his search and had mainly relied on the word of KGB archivists. He stated, "What I saw gave me no basis to claim a full clarification. [Hiss attorney] John Lowenthal pushed me to say things of which I was not fully convinced."

General-Lieutenant Vitaly Pavlov, who ran Soviet intelligence work in North America in the late 1930s and early 1940s, provided some corroboration of Volkogonov in his memoirs, stating that Hiss never worked for the USSR as one of his agents.

In 2004, General Julius Kobyakov, a retired Russian intelligence official, revealed that he had been the person who actually searched the files for Volkogonov. According to Kobyakov, his research revealed that there was no indication that Alger Hiss had been either a paid or unpaid agent of the Soviet Union only "after careful study" of KGB archives and "after querying sister services" (military intelligence).

In 2007, further testimonial of the absence of Hiss's name in Soviet archives was given by Russian researcher Svetlana A. Chervonnaya, who had been conducting research since the early 1990s.

Noel Field

In 1992, records were found in Hungarian Interior Ministry archives that mentioned Alger Hiss as a Communist spy. These were transcripts of interrogations of Noel Field that had taken place between 1949 and 1954. Field was an American who had spied for the Soviet Union, but had been arrested while traveling through Eastern Europe on charges that he was actually spying for American intelligence. During his five-year imprisonment in Hungary he referred to Hiss as a fellow Communist and spy four times, including relating the following: "Around the summer of 1935 Alger Hiss tried to induce me to do service for the Soviets. I was indiscreet enough to tell him he had come too late." Hede Massing told a similar tale of Field's habit of indiscretion to fellow Soviet spies to US authorities upon her 1947 defection that when she attempted to recruit Noel Field for one Soviet spy network (the OGPU), Field replied that he already worked another (the GRU). Massing claimed during Hiss' 2nd trial that whether Noel Field was to be an OGPU agent with her or a GRU agent with Hiss was the subject of a brief cocktail party conversation with Hiss.

Field was released by the Hungarian secret police in 1954 but remained in Hungary until his death in 1970. Upon his release, he wrote a letter to the Communist Party's Central Committee in Moscow complaining that he had been tortured in prison and that this had caused him to "confess more and more lies as truth." Hiss's defenders argue that Field's implication of Hiss may have been one of these lies and that Field was trying to show his veracity as a Communist by connecting his activities to the well-known Hiss. In 1957, Field wrote a letter to Hiss in which he expressed his belief in Hiss's innocence and spoke of personal knowledge of Hede Massing's "outrageous lie" when she testified at Hiss's second trial.

Venona and "ALES"

In 1995, the existence of the so-called Venona project was revealed. This project had resulted in the decryption or partial decryption of thousands of telegrams sent to the Soviet Union from its U.S. operatives in the years 1942 to 1945. FBI Special Agent Robert Lamphere identified the Soviet spy known by the codename "ALES" in one decoded cable as "probably Alger Hiss". In 1997, the bipartisan Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, chaired by Democratic Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, stated in its findings: "The complicity of Alger Hiss of the State Department seems settled. As does that of Harry Dexter White of the Treasury Department." In his 1998 book Secrecy: The American Experience, Moynihan wrote, "Belief in the guilt or innocence of Alger Hiss became a defining issue in American intellectual life. Parts of the American government had conclusive evidence of his guilt, but they never told." In addition to Moynihan, the identification of Hiss as ALES has been accepted by many other authors, including Allen Weinstein, John Earl Haynes and Harvey Klehr. National Security Agency analysts have also gone on record asserting that ALES could only have been Alger Hiss.

The Venona transcript with the most relevance to the Hiss case is #1822, sent March 30, 1945, from the Soviet's Washington station chief to Moscow. This transcript indicates that ALES attended the Yalta conference and then went to Moscow. Hiss attended Yalta and then traveled to Moscow in his capacity as adviser to Secretary of State Edward Stettinius.

However, the Venona evidence on Alger Hiss is disputed by some. John Lowenthal, a Hiss lawyer and longtime supporter, has challenged the Hiss-ALES identification in Venona #1822 by the following:

• ALES was said to be the leader of a small group of espionage agents; Hiss was accused of having acted alone, aside from his wife as a typist and Chambers as courier.
• ALES was a GRU (military intelligence) agent who obtained military intelligence, and only rarely provided State Department material; Alger Hiss in his trial was accused of obtaining only non-military information and the papers used against him were non-military State Department materials that he allegedly produced on a regular basis.
• Even if Hiss was the spy he was accused of being, it's unlikely he would have continued being so after 1938 as ALES did, because in that year Hiss would have become too great a risk for any Soviet agency to use. In that year, Whittaker Chambers broke with the Communist Party and then went into hiding, telling his Communist Party colleagues he would denounce them if they did not follow suit. At this point therefore, ALES's cover would be in extreme jeopardy if he were Alger Hiss.
• Other recent information places ALES in Mexico City at the same time when Hiss was known to be in Washington.

Lowenthal also suggested an interpretation of the transcript that differs from Lamphere's reading. Lowenthal's reading does not put ALES at the Yalta conference at all, but rather refers to the presence at Yalta of Andrey Vyshinsky, the Soviet deputy foreign minister. According to Lowenthal, the entire point of paragraph 6 of Venona #1822—that the GRU asked Vyshinsky to get in touch with ALES to convey thanks from the GRU for a job well done—would have been unnecessary if ALES had actually been in Moscow, because the GRU could have easily contacted ALES with no need of Vyshinsky. Others, notably Eduard Mark, dispute Lowenthal's analysis on this point. In the opinion of intelligence historian John R. Schindler, the original Russian text of Venona #1822 (released in 2005), removes some of the ambiguity present in the English translation and confirms ALES's presence at Yalta. Schindler concludes "the identification of ALES as Alger Hiss, made by the U.S. Government more than a half-century ago, seems exceptionally solid based on the evidence now available; message 1822 is only one piece of that evidence, yet a compelling one."

Also in rebuttal to Lowenthal, John Earl Haynes and Harvey Klehr noted the following:

• None of the evidence presented at the Hiss trial precludes the possibility that Hiss had been an espionage agent after 1938 or that he had only passed State Department documents after 1938.
• Chambers's charges were not seriously investigated until after the revelations made by the defection of Elizabeth Bentley in 1945, so Hiss and the Soviets could in theory have considered it an acceptable risk for him continue espionage work, even after Chambers's defection.
• Vyshinsky was not in the U.S. between Yalta and the time of the Venona message and the message is from the Washington KGB station reporting on a talk with Ales in the U.S., thus making Lowenthal's analysis impossible.

There is one Venona cable, #1579, that includes the name "Hiss." It consists mostly of fragments of a 1943 message from the GRU chief in New York to GRU headquarters in Moscow. The reference reads: "…from the State Department by name of HISS…" The name "Hiss" was not translated by the Venona cryptanalysts, but rather appeared just that way in the original—"Spelled out in the Latin alphabet" according to footnote iv. In the cable, "Hiss" goes without a first name, so it could possibly refer to either Alger or Donald, since both were at the State Department in 1943. For the GRU to name Hiss openly, not by a codename, would be radically unorthodox for Soviet espionage protocols if he was, indeed, a spy. Both the NSA and the FBI have insisted that once a codename was assigned it was used to the exclusion of the real name.

At an April 2007 symposium, authors Kai Bird and Svetlana Chervonnaya presented evidence that a U.S. diplomat named Wilder Foote was the best match to ALES, based on the movements of all the officials present at the U.S.-Soviet Yalta conference. In particular, Bird and Chervonnaya noted that Foote had been in Mexico City at a time when a Soviet cable placed ALES there, whereas Hiss had left Mexico several days earlier (see above). Other authors have disputed the likelihood that Foote was ALES, noting that Foote doesn't fit known information about ALES, and saying that the author of the Soviet cable could have been mistaken in stating that ALES was still in Mexico City. An April 8, 2007 London Observer article quoted Professor Christopher Andrew of Cambridge University, who differed with Kai Bird's conclusions. The same Observer article by David Smith concluded "that the decisive proof would be presented within a year in a new book by Gerald Haines of the Library of Congress."

"The Haunted Wood"

In 1999, historian Allen Weinstein and KGB agent turned journalist Alexander Vassiliev released The Haunted Wood: Soviet Espionage in America--The Stalin Era. The book is largely based on exclusive access to several Soviet intelligence files that Weinstein and Vassiliev gained by paying ex-KGB agents a total reported to be in excess of 1 million dollars (provided by their publisher, Random House). Haunted Wood includes a long narrative of the Hiss-Chambers case, and affirms Hiss's guilt. However, in a footnote it is stated "we have been able to further clarify Alger Hiss's role as a Soviet agent only through his occasional appearance in NKVD/NKGB archives." These "occasional appearances" in turn, are based on what author Athan Theoharis calls "a series of questionable speculative conclusions:" that Hiss had the codename "ALES," that KGB agents sometimes forgot his codename when they sent reports to Moscow, and that Hiss was sometimes also identified by the codename "Lawyer."

Haunted Wood has also come under criticism over the fact that the memos on which it is based were discovered in Soviet Archives on a lucrative "cash-for-documents" access rights basis. All other historians were denied access to the same archives, making it impossible for others to check Weinstein's and Vassiliev's work.

Allen Weinstein has also been accused of misquoting, misrepresenting, or misconstruing some of his interview subjects for his earlier book Perjury: The Hiss-Chambers Case. One of his sources, Samuel Krieger, sued Weinstein for libel in 1979. Weinstein settled out of court by issuing a public apology and paying Krieger an undisclosed sum for his error.

David Lowenthal furthermore discovered that a considerable amount of scholarly friction existed between the two coauthors. Vassiliev stated, "I never saw a document where Hiss would be called ALES or ALES may be called Hiss. I made a point of that to Allen." Weinstein was "sloppy almost every time he quoted documents relating to Alger Hiss." However, in a 2002 episode of PBS's NOVA, Vassiliev said, "The Rosenbergs, Theodore Hall and Alger Hiss did spy for the Soviets, and I saw their real names in the documents, their code names, a lot of documents about that. How you judge them is up to you. To me, they're heroes."

Oleg Gordievsky

In 1985, Oleg Gordievsky, a high ranking KGB agent, defected to the West. In his 1990 book Gordievsky reported attending a lecture before a KGB audience in which Iskhak Abdulovich Akhmerov identified Hiss, apparently as one of the Soviet Union's U.S. agents during World War II. Although his reminiscence of the Akhmerov lecture remains unchallenged, Gordievsky went further and claimed that Hiss had the codename identity of "ALES". This at first appeared to be an independent corroboration of the codename, as it appeared before the Venona cables were revealed to the public. However, it was later revealed that Gordievsky's source for the ALES identity was an article by journalist Thomas Powell, who had seen National Security Agency documents on Venona years before their release.

References and further reading

• Chambers, Whittaker (1952). Witness. Regnery. ISBN 0-89526-571-0.
• Cooke, Alistair (1950). A Generation on Trial: USA v. Alger Hiss. Greenwood Press. ISBN 0-313-23373-X.
• Hiss, Alger (1957). In the Court of Public Opinion. Harper Collins. ISBN 0-06-090293-0.
• Theoharis, Athan (Editor) (1982). Beyond the Hiss Case: The FBI, Congress, and the Cold War. Temple University Press. ISBN 0-87722-241-X. {{cite book}}: |first= has generic name (help)
• Hiss, Alger (1988). Recollections of a Life. Little Brown & Co. ISBN 1559700246.
• Weinstein, Allen (1997). Perjury: The Hiss-Chambers Case. Random House. ISBN 0-679-77338-X. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
• Tanenhaus, Sam (1998). Whittaker Chambers: A Biography. Modern Library. ISBN 0-375-75145-9. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
• Weinstein, Allen and Vassiliev, Alexander (1999). The Haunted Wood: Soviet Espionage in America--The Stalin Era. Modern Library. ISBN 0-375-75536-5. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
• Hiss, Tony (1999). The View from Alger's Window: A Son's Memoir. Alfred E. Knopf. ISBN 0-375-40127-X.
• Coulter, Ann (2003). Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism. Three Rivers Press. ISBN 1-4000-5032-4.
• Swan, Patrick (Editor) (2003). Alger Hiss, Whittaker Chambers, and the Schism in the American Soul. ISI Books. ISBN 1-882926-91-9. {{cite book}}: |first= has generic name (help)
• White, G. Edward (2005). Alger Hiss's Looking-Glass Wars: The Covert Life of a Soviet Spy. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-518255-3.

External links

• Ehrman, John (2007). "The Alger Hiss Case; A Half-Century of Controversy". Center for the Study of Intelligence, Central Intelligence Agency.
• Gay, James Thomas (1998). "The Alger Hiss Spy Case". HistoryNet.com. Retrieved 2006-09-13.
• Hermann, Donald H. J. (2005). "Deception And Betrayal: The Tragedy Of Alger Hiss". The Chicago Literary Club.
• Kisseloff, jeff (Managing Editor) (2003). "The Alger Hiss Story; Search for the Truth". Retrieved 2006-09-13. {{cite web}}: |first= has generic name (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
• Kisseloff, Jeff. "Distorted Reflections". Retrieved 2006-12-07. A detailed critique of the book Alger Hiss's Looking-Glass Wars
• Kisseloff, Jeff. "101 Errors in Ann Coulter's "Treason"". The Alger Hiss Story. Retrieved 2007-06-13. A critique of the chapter of Coulter's book that deals with Hiss
• Linder, Douglas (2003). "The Alger Hiss Trials: An Account". "Famous Trials". University Of Missouri-Kansas City School Of Law.
• Lowenthal, John (Autumn 2000). "Venona and Alger Hiss" (PDF). Intelligence and National Security. Retrieved 2006-09-13. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
• Moynihan, Daniel Patrick (Chairman) (1997). "Report of the Commission On Protecting And Reducing Government Secrecy" (PDF). United States Government Printing Office. Retrieved 2006-09-13.
• Navasky, Victor (1997). "Allen Weinstein's Docudrama". The Nation. A review of Weinstein's "Perjury"
• Noe, Denise (2005). "The Alger Hiss Case". Crime Library. Courtroom Television Network. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
• Schrecker, Ellen (1999). "The Spies Who Loved Us?". A discussion of Weinstein and "The Haunted Wood". The Nation. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
• Navasky, Victor (April 12, 2007). "Hiss in History". The Nation.
• "Hiss: A New Book Finds Him Guilty as Charged". Time Magazine. Mar. 29, 1976. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help) A review of the 1976 edition of Weinstein's Perjury