User talk:Fastily
SYS_logo.png
hello
I get a message from you that my file SYS_logo.png was deleted because of a missing copyright information.
Meanwhile I repeated the upload of the file 2 times, added that this is a foto by myself, and thet I put it under public domain.
I WILL NOT UPLOAD THE FOTO AGAIN.
Many people become wiki tired. What most urgantly would have to be removed, are self-denominated 'administrators' which lost all funcionality. Thats the same system like we had on the comunism.
As you can see from Linux distros, even for gratis things has a strong concurrence. wiki have to make efforts for survive in future, inclusive remove non-funcional people.
I let the article just without this picture. Its problem of wikis quality, not of me. If you want, you recover the picture youself
And in my own sites, I add this example to the reasons why wiki isn't trustworthy, playground for trolls and a self-denominated aristocracy
bye bye —Preceding unsigned comment added by SYS-Linux (talk • contribs) 19:29, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, um, instead of making egregious complaints, you could have elected to educate yourself by reading the text on the form you used to upload the file, where the whole process of uploading files is described in excruciating detail. Alternatively, you could have also chosen to read the warnings on your talk page which would have served the same purpose. If you don't know how to read instructions, then obviously, editing Wikipedia is not for you. Bye. -FASTILYsock(TALK) 22:06, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Aftermath Killing the Future photo on the Aftermath page was removed. I am not truly familiar with how this works, however, I assumed that I had provided proper trademark credit and authorization for the photo. I not only took the picture, but also managed the band and released the record on my label. Complete trademark, copyright and licensing is owned me. Can you assist me in having the photo appear on the page again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zoident (talk • contribs) 04:07, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
inclusion-exclusion-3sets.png
I apologize for neglecting to include a copyright tag in the file inclusion-exclusion-3sets.png. Does my image now comply with Wikipedia standards? Austinmohr (talk) 06:53, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
- No worries - yes, the fix you made will do just fine. Regards, FASTILYsock(TALK) 19:27, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
Regarding RfA
Yes you are right that currently i do not deserve to be an administrator. so you should proceed and delete my request, but do tell me that how much edits are required for RfA? —Preceding Amitabh.Divyaraj comment added by Amitabh1986 (talk • contribs) 13:44, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
- Alright then, thanks for being upfront about it. While there is no set number of edits required for RfA, most successful candidates have 8,000+ edits on average. However, it's really the quality of the edits that matters. Hope that helps to answer your question. Regards, FASTILYsock(TALK) 19:29, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
Is there something I'm not understanding?
| Extended content |
|---|
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing this template.
(This notice was added 03:37, 8 May 2010 (UTC) by Fetchcomms)
Alternate accounts
Hello. I saw you also edit under the account User:Fastilysock. What is the benefit of creating another account, and what do you use it for? Please answer on my talk page or at least leave a {{talkback}}. Thanks. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 04:45, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) (talk page stalker) As noted on User:Fastilysock, the account is for public computers (libraries, labs, etc.) which may have malicious (password-hacking) software. See the policy here. Thanks, mono 05:05, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- For use on public networks (where one's account could possibly be compromised) and for use of automated tools (I make all the important edits off of my main account and don't use automated tools on it so people can actually find my edits without having to sort through a mass of huggle or twinkle edits.) -FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:02, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- My answer seems rather redundant now... mono 05:05, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- For use on public networks (where one's account could possibly be compromised) and for use of automated tools (I make all the important edits off of my main account and don't use automated tools on it so people can actually find my edits without having to sort through a mass of huggle or twinkle edits.) -FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:02, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
May 2010
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Cheating in chess, you may be blocked from editing. (talk) 19:13, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Resource based economy (talk) 19:13, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
