Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Timwest1156 (talk | contribs) at 03:45, 30 September 2011 (→Timothy Ray West: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions nor to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as CSD G6), or in articles for deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other XfD processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions on the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

Argo Group

reasoning -Medeia (talk) 14:41, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Dear Admin,

I am currently doing my internship and I am trying to place an article on Argo Group Int., which is an insurance company. The reason is not advertising, but to have the company itself listed on this online Encyclopedia which contains information about almost everything. I have also seen many others companies and their profile, such as one of the biggest companies Axa profile as well. I limited the description in order to avoid advertisement, and if it will be deleted again, could anyone tell me why? Or what should I write, how should I write it? My source was linked as well.. Im looking forward to hearing from you, Thank you a lot for your help,

Orsi Balog

The Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd. is an American Insurance Group operating globally with offices in South America- Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo- Western Europe –London, Brussels, Paris, Zurich- and the Middle East-Dubai. It was founded in 1986, Headquartered in Hamilton, Bermuda.

The Argo group of companies are engaged in underwriting Specialty Insurances and Reinsurance Products.

The Argo Group encompasses four business segments: Excess & Surplus Lines, Commercial Specialty, Reinsurance and International Specialty.

(The company Excess and Surplus Lines segment underwrites casualty, property, transportation, and binding authority for commercial enterprises. Its Commercial Specialty segment offers property casualty and surety coverages; and underwrites business coverage for small commercial businesses.)[1]finance.yh

Page was last deleted as a G11; before that it was a A7. Please read Wikipedia:Corporations and the Community and WP:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 17:13, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zuzana Tlučková

I want to improve the article if undeleted.In addition to that,I'll put in as uch reliable sources as possible and improve the top.Not to be biased. -IanRootBeerDubber (talk) 23:08, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there was enough there to really be of use to you. All you'd written before was an infobox, and most of the article text was calling the template rather than filling out its parameters. If you want to write a better version, go ahead, you don't need any permission here. Cheers. lifebaka++ 22:42, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

IISD

wish to update -Jmanaigre (talk) 18:39, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on your talk page and think it would be best if we discussed there first... L.tak (talk) 19:00, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Given the amount of copyrighted material, this will need a re-write rather than a restore. Skier Dude (talk) 20:38, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Celoxis

Sorry I haven't gone through the wiki policies on creating the article. Now I have read them and will follow them whole creating any article. -61.8.140.170 (talk) 14:30, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celoxis, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Mailer Diablo (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:21, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Abdullah al-Qasemi

person does exist -Al-Musta'rib (talk) 21:18, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Reason for deletion: person was claimed to be nonexistent.

I would like to point out that this author does exist, has had a lot of his books published, and even has been the subject of a doctoral thesis (see Vom Fundamentalisten zum Atheisten, by Jürgen Wasella). Another way to verify his existence and notability is to search for عبد ألله القصيمي on the international bookshop http://www.neelwafurat.com : one will find that they sell quite a lot of his books.

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Gabbe (talk) 08:59, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Kubiszewski

Reasoning for deletion was stated that Andy Kubiszewksi had not proven to have done enough credible work outside of the band Stabbing Westward. Andy had scored music for 5 films and over 25 TV series on numerous networks. He has also written the theme songs on 7 of those TV shows and has licensed songs in at least 60 projects including TV commercials, TV shows, films and video games. He is currently the composer on the show entitled Storage Wars on Discovery, as well as Ice Road Truckers, Ax Men and Swords. Storage Wars is the highest rated show currently airing on cable TV and he will also be scoring the spin off show Storage Wars Dallas. He also recently won 3 BMI Awards for his high volume of reported songs and score currently airing on television. -Dannycooper89 (talk) 01:23, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.. JohnCD (talk) 16:15, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A Broom With A View

I am requesting assistance in being able to communicate with the editor(s) who removed three of my pages (listed below). I am a fairly new author and am still learning proper Wiki protocol.

RE: 14:21, 21 September 2011 Fram (talk | contribs) deleted "A Broom With A View (album)" ‎ (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement: http://halloweencarols.com/music/a_broom_with_a_view)

RE: 14:21, 21 September 2011 Fram (talk | contribs) deleted "Arachnitect (album)" ‎ (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement: http://halloweencarols.com/node/11)

RE: 14:22, 21 September 2011 Fram (talk | contribs) deleted "Vampire Empire (album)" ‎ (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement: http://halloweencarols.com/music/a_broom_with_a_view)

I would like to be able to restore the three pages that were deleted, supposedly for copyright infringement (not sure what the unambiguous means).

I was not contacted about the removal, and just happened upon it tonight when I tried to enter on and update them. I was not given a chance to make any adjustments, defend, or understand the reasoning for the removal. I thought that I had followed formats from other artist album pages.

The graphics for the albums were cleared through wikimedia ahead of time, and the material used was referenced and verifiable. I will be happy to modify the text or, if there is any need for to obtain copyright permission from the artist, Kristen Lawrence, to satisfy any copyright questions. Please let me know what I need to do.

Thank you for your assistance. -Idaho50 (talk) 05:55, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note that admins will not restore copyright infringements. See WP:Copyrights#Using copyrighted work from others. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 17:10, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NewsWire NZ

Take a look at the website yourselves, guys. NewsWire NZ is a legitimate news outlet produced by the largest journalism school in New Zealand, the Whitiriea NZ Media Training Centre in Wellington, NZ. If you Google NewsWire NZ you'll see it consistently ranks at the top of the page. Take a look: www.NewsWire.co.nz We are averaging just under 400,000 page visits a year. Our students have posted nearly 2000 news packages on the site since it launched in 2008. Mainstream media in New Zealand regularly take content from the site to use it. Given what has happened with my first attempt to create a presence on Wikipedia, I'm guessing our web-savvy students will be taking a keen interest in how this pans out. Jim Tucker, Journalism Programme Manager, Whitireia NZ Media Training Centre, Wellington. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Newswirenz (talk • contribs)

Adjiedj Bakas

Dear editor, I understand that my profile has been deleted on both the English and Dutch sites. I don't understand this. I'm a wellknown trendwatcher in Holland, sold over 400.000 books and am more than 300 times annually in the media, have more than 7.000 followers on Twitter and will host an own tv-show from december 2011 on, to be watched by 4.5 million people. How can anyone delete the profile without any communication with me? Can this please be undeleted? Thanks, greetz, Adjiedj Bakas -Privacy63 (talk) 11:01, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done This is an encyclopedia, not a place for profiles. None of the claims in the article seem to be verified by actual sources, and since you appear to be a living person, encyclopedic articles cannot exist without such sources. If you have been involved at all in the creation of the article, beware of WP:COI and WP:PROMO. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:19, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A New Type of VTOL Aircraft

Please help me to understand why this short article was deleted.

Although it is a new idea, it has some background:

1) I made a presentation of this new aircraft concept to the January 2010 meeting of the American Helicopter society in San Francisco. Unfortunately, proceedings are not published.

2) A patent was been applied for on this new aircraft concept two years ago, but now days patent applications take a long time to produce results; I have not yet gotten the first response back from the patent office.

3) A toy used to exist which consisted of a stick with a propeller at each end and a rubber band between the propellers to turn the propellers in opposite directions. When the rubber band was wound up and the toy was released it flew at high speed. In a sense I could say that there have been many thousands of prototypes made.

So this is not an unknown or irrational concept.

This was my second submission of the same article. I tried to make the article more like reporting than soap-boxing. Did I fail in this effort? If so, how could I have said things to make them sound more objective?

Yes, the article I submitted was quite short. I could work to make it much longer if that is the main problem. Would that help?

I saw something about too many caps in the title. I thought that "VTOL" was well understood by most people as meaning "Vertical Take Off and Landing". Was I mistaken? Would any of the phrases below be better titles? If not, please make some suggestions.

a) The Lawrence Tiltplane

b) The Tiltplane

c) A New Vertical Take Off and Landing Aircraft

Sincerely, John Lawrence — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jlawren3 (talk • contribs) 14:24, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. The business of an encyclopedia is to summarise material already published in reliable sources. It is not a noticeboard for publication of anything new. One of Wikipedia's fundamental policies is Wikipedia:No original research, which includes: "If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to premiere such a discovery." Also, in writing about your own discovery you have, from our point of view, a WP:Conflict of interest: Wikipedia is not to be used for advertising or promotion of any kind. JohnCD (talk) 14:53, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ontario tourist route logos

deleted without warning, should have already been tagged with 'too simple for copyright' -ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 01:17, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]


deleted without warning, should have already been tagged with 'too simple for copyright' -ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 01:17, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Both of these have already been restored by the deleting admin. lifebaka++ 18:55, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Phi Kappa Chi

Notable Fraternity -129.62.200.175 (talk) 15:12, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Page was originally deleted because it was flagged as a "non notable fraternity". This is untrue. It is the largest fraternity at Baylor University, is competitive in intramural sports, sing, and float every year, and quite frankly stands for principles like sobriety and abstinence that most fraternities overlook.

Popularity is not notability. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 17:07, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. None of the points you mention confer Notability in Wikipedia's sense, so I have nominated the article for deletion at WP:Articles for deletion/Phi Kappa Chi. You are welcome to comment there, but first please read Wikipedia:Notability, Wikipedia:College and university article guidelines#Student life and Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause. JohnCD (talk) 10:31, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hansel and Gretel in 3D

OTRS permission confirmed in ticket 2011092410000481 for release under CC-BY-SA-3.0 for content by The Institute, shown as one of the production companies on the website: [1]. -– Adrignola talk 15:19, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • The reason for deletion at the previous AfD was that the project had not started filming and so failed WP:NFF; that was over a year ago, but I do not see in the references for this new article any reliable source confirming that filming has started - all the accessible references are dated July, 2010, and IMDb says only that the project is in development. Also I note this edit summary saying "looks like the Michael Bay project is dead." I will ask the article author if he has any up to date sources. JohnCD (talk) 17:15, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

David Wrone

David Wrone is cited by four articles, one article even dedicates a paragraph to him:

(1) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UWSP_Albertson_Center_for_Learning_Resources

(2) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_assassination_conspiracy_theories

  • Section: Other published theories
  • David Wrone's The Zapruder Film (2003) concludes that the shot that killed JFK came from in front of the limousine, and that JFK's throat and back wounds were caused by an in-and-through shot originating from the grassy knoll. Three shots were fired from three different angles, none of them from Lee Harvey Oswald's window at the Texas School Book Depository. Wrone is a professor of history (emeritus) at the University of Wisconsin–Stevens Point. ISBN 0-7006-1291-2.

(3) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Posner

(4) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Sagatelyan

So I think an article on David Wrone - which I entered to Wikipedia - would be relevant and interesting for readers, especially for people interested in one (of only two!) historians who broke The Silence of the Historians (David W. Mantik, 2000) about the JFK assassinations.

The dates about him I had gotten from himself by e-mail after I asked him for that. This, I think, should not be a reason to delete the article. Please restore the article. ~~ -Thalimed (talk) 20:16, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, but please read the Wikipedia:Verifiability policy:

"any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source... The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—whether readers can check that material in Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true."

Articles about living persons are automatically deleted after ten days unless referenced. I have restored this, and reset the timer, so that you have ten days to provide references. I'm afraid information "gotten from himself by e-mail" is not good enough: it must already have been published in a reliable source. JohnCD (talk) 22:07, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you JohnDC for restoring the article. I entered the reference "Spartacus Schoolnet: David Wrone", where the essential parts of the information can be found. I found it there myself and then contacted David Wrone for some more information. Will that be OK? Thalimed (talk) 11:01, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. (Meanwhile I sent my e-mail correspondence with David Wrone to Spartacus Schoolnet, so their article about David Wrone will soon be more complete, I think.) Thalimed (talk) 11:01, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That is enough, just, to remove the BLPprod notice, and I have taken it off; but if Spartacus Schoolnet simply publish what you send them they cannot be considered a reliable source for Wikipedia's purposes, which implies some degree of editorial control and fact-checking. What is really needed is someone independent of Wrone writing about him. JohnCD (talk) 21:59, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, no, Spartacus Schoolnet will not simply publish what I sent them, that's not what they do. - I added references of two independent well-known JFK researchers (one of them even a historian). I hope this will suffice for the moment, won't it? --Thalimed (talk) 22:32, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Emma Rayne Lyle

(extended draft article removed - it duplicated this version submitted to AfC. JohnCD (talk) 09:53, 25 September 2011 (UTC))[reply]
I have created a new article for Emma Rayne Lyle but it did not take: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Emma_Rayne_Lyle#Emma_Rayne_Lyle -- 75.192.87.28 (talk) 21:35, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I followed the instructions from the administrator who told me to rewrite the article. You may find the link to the discussions for the article creation here: Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Emma_Rayne_Lyle#References and the original article Emma Rayne Lyle and its discussion Talk:Emma_Rayne_Lyle
Emma Rayne Lyle is listed as an actress in two films on Wikipedia and her name is the only one that redirects to a deleted page. It doesn't look professional on her part. I Don't know How She Does It and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Return_%282011_film%29
75.243.141.6 (talk) 03:06, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merged duplicate sections below into this. lifebaka++ 05:19, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not 100% sure that Lyle meets WP:ENTERTAINER, but certainly the above (which is the proposed article) in no way meets A7. I'll move the AfC to article space and clean it up a bit. Cheers. lifebaka++ 05:25, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rituparna Bhattacharjee

Kindly visit the pages from where the facts have been collected. Kindly do not delete the name of Rituparna Bhattacharjee because she has been recognised as 'the youngest female writer' of Bengali literature. In the following pages you may verify the truth.

http://photos.merinews.com/newPhotoLanding.jsp?imageID=14099 http://www.merinews.com/article/rituparna-bhattacharjee-turned-a-writer-at-eleven/128938.shtml http://photos.merinews.com/newPhotoLanding.jsp?imageID=14099 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1998_in_literature


There are nearly all newspapers in both English and Bengali which reviewed her book 'BHUTIYA'. kindly include the book and recognise the youngest female author in your Wikipaedia page. Regards Ratan Bhattacharjee

The Bawdies

not my article, went looking for it tonight and found the redlink, notable enough in Japan I think I can fix the issues -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 17:22, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. The PROD reason was "no indication of meeting WP:BAND. Only source does not back up claim of comparison to Beatles." JohnCD (talk) 17:32, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Phyllis Zagano

I noticed I was listed among syndicated columnists and was trying to add information to my ;listing--not sure why I was deleted--I am a rather well known academic -Zagano (talk) 17:41, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Writing about oneself is strongly discouraged here, for reasons explained at Wikipedia:Autobiography; and the article gave no indication that you meet the notability standard of WP:Notability (academics). More advice on your talk page soon. JohnCD (talk) 20:31, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lana Del Rey

Please undelete this page because Lana Del Rey is a legitimate artist that I am a fan of. I don't know her personally. She hasn't released anything yet, but has a record coming out in October followed by a full album to be released at an unspecified date. A song of hers was played on the NPR show All Songs Considered within a few days of you deleting this page. Please undelete this page because I feel that you may have deleted this page hastily. Thank you. -LoneMinnow (talk) 19:03, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Sorry, but see WP:MUSICBIO for what a musical performer needs to have achieved before having a Wikipedia article. JohnCD (talk) 20:38, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Songcat:/B.Hall (really should be called Barbara Hall

advertising -Songcat (talk) 19:41, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone ahead and restored your userpage, as well as moved it to a subpage at User:Songcat/Barbara Hall so you can continue to work on it. Please be aware that if you move the page into the mainspace (where articles are) without fixing the advertising issues noted by the tagger and deleting admin, it is extremely likely to be deleted again. In addition, please be aware that userspace is not an indefinite holding ground for previously deleted articles; if you do not edit this page in several months, it may be deleted again. Cheers. lifebaka++ 22:37, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of Mobile Suit Gundam SEED mobile weapons

List is more helpful than individual articles, and is of the same value as a list of characters, technology, or warships. All of these lists exists. -76.113.99.134 (talk) 19:53, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. This was deleted as a result of the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Mobile Suit Gundam SEED mobile weapons (2nd nomination) so, as stated at the top of this page, it will not be undeleted here. If you consider that the discussion was wrongly closed, or you have new information, you should first approach user Fram (talk), the administrator who closed the discussion; then, if your concerns are not addressed, you can consider going to WP:Deletion review, but note that this has already been there once - see Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 June 6. JohnCD (talk) 20:21, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pabulo Henrique Rampelotto

The discussion raised in Pabulo Henrique Rampelotto Page by Headbomb is clearly moved by his personal feelings about the Journal of Cosmology and related authors. In fact, the discussion just torn around is the journal is scientific or not.

The same discussion was raised by Headbomb in the Journal Page. As expected, Headbomb` personal and vulgar comments have been denied by wiki community, and now, the page remains as an encyclopedic paper must be. But even today, this guy insists with his ignorant attacks (See Journal of Cosmology Page Discussion).

I just hope this kind of personal feelings do not happen again here and in others pages.

The Page has been improved and updated by different authors in the last days fitting as an encyclopedic paper must be: with clear, formal, and coherent information. -H.vonNeumann (talk) 19:54, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This page is for requesting the restoration of articles which have been deleted. Pabulo Henrique Rampelotto has not been deleted: deletion is being discussed at WP:Articles for deletion/Pabulo Henrique Rampelotto and that is where you should comment; but please assume good faith and do not make personal attacks - comment on contributions, not on the contributor. JohnCD (talk) 20:08, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Songcat: B. Hall Sandbox

see below -Songcat (talk) 22:52, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please call it B. Hall. Songcat is my username. She is a cartoonist and artist of some repute: see The Great Women Cartoonists by Trina Robbins (Workman, 2008). Also Barbara Hall (as she is also known) is mentioned in Lambiek's Comicopedia (http://lambiek.net/artists/). She is the co-founder of Quarry Hill Creative Center which has its own Wikipedia page. I can't figure out all the complexities of Wikipedia these days. Any help you can give me would be great. Thanks, Isabella F. McFarlin daughter of Barbara Hall Fiske -- though she deserves this listing, not because she's my mother but because she is a person of some remarkable quality and has some renown. Thanks! I.

I'm fairly sure that I've already put this at User:Songcat/Barbara Hall for you. Just click that link to find it, and work on it there. Cheers. lifebaka++ 08:06, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CR Narayanan

reasoning -Gokulchandola (talk) 05:44, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, no reasoning provided. lifebaka++ 08:07, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Bond

I would like to take up this article, which will be about an upcoming Kannada film. It is a notable item and the media coverage has gained significant traction. Thanks. -Niri M / ನಿರಿ 07:01, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user EncMstr (talk), who proposed it, in case he wishes to consider nominating it at WP:Articles for deletion. Since release is not until September 2012, you may not be able to meet the requirement of WP:NFF for reliable sources to confirm that principal photography has started: if not, ask me and I will move it to the WP:Article Incubator where you can work on it until WP:NFF is met. JohnCD (talk) 09:06, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the prompt (and a detailed) response, JohnCD. I'm afraid you might have to move it to the incubator for a while since the principal photography has not yet commenced. As per recent news, it should begin by the second week of next month, so it can be moved back later. Sorry, I was unaware of WP:NFF. Thank you again for your time. Cheers. - Niri M / ನಿರಿ 09:40, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Done - incubated to Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Anna Bond. JohnCD (talk) 10:42, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shideboss

reasoning -Shideboss (talk) 10:22, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1.shideboss is the page name 2. reason because he is one of the many celebrities that are no on wikipedia and i am trying to rase awarness of him.as he is my uncle as well also i am not happy of the fact its been deleted and no one has told me why.

Claire Rushbrook

Prod-ed as not notable, but a very recognisable face on British TV. WP:ENT defines notability as "has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions". A quick look at her imdb page will demonstrate how she meets that criteria. -Rob Sinden (talk) 12:23, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. January (talk) 16:02, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My Healthy Home

Sorry, I'm a bit new at this. But I did spend a lot of time researching in order to put up an article about a well known expert in home environmental matters. I was going to add a recent public acknowledgement by Green America when I noticed the page was deleted. Please undelete or provide the guidelines that have been unmet. Thanks! -Jimejamm (talk) 15:16, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Salvio Let's talk about it! 16:06, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kenya Kongonis Cricket Club

reasoning -Kimemia Maina (talk) 16:36, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the criteria by which this article was declared 'not notable' are plainly scandalous. If being one of the oldest institutions in Kenyan cricket and running, by a country mile, the most productive youth set up in Kenyan cricket doesn't merit notability by Wikipedia then arguably there is not a single facet of Kenyan cricket that is notable enough to have a wikipedia article.

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenya Kongonis Cricket Club, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user TParis (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. January (talk) 17:11, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Monsoon Group of Las Vegas

this article was created about a Las Vegas nightlife group that has significant relevance and sited 3rd party sources, though I respect an administrator's reasoning as self promotional, ANY article sounds or appears promotional, these articles and my future article on Las Vegas nightlife groups will sound or appear promotional as they are for wiki's intended purpose is to be INFORMATIONAL. Thank you. -Wiki BioInfo (talk) 19:39, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, promotional does not always equal informational. See also puffery. In any case, articles deleted as G11 (blatant advertisement) won't be undeleted through this process. Please read m:Neutral point of view and its local incarnation. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 20:31, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BWilkins what separates a company or persons' accomplishments and achievements form 'puffery'? In a newly advancing industry such as nightlife there are some significant milestones that are significant such as the unique organization and services that the company in question represents. I assume that you care less, but there is a difference from the company in the article than other 'nightlife management groups'. In fact it's the only concise nightlife group in the US. Which is the nightlife industry is significant and deems encyclopedic and important to those within the industry. Things such as 'the first' of it's kind or developments within a certain industry should have no issues. I understand and respect that there is much exploitation and abuse as I have read it myself. And it is only by discussion like these and by members of the Wiki community, which I am new to, can police and monitor misuse. That being said, I will continue to argue this point and share the significance of the company's development and it's significance to the nightclub and bar and nightlife industry. Although I do not compare this company to the likes of Dupont, but when a company or individual develops or revolutionizes a product or an industry I feel that is significant. Having the opportunity to edit the Monsoon Group article and be more direct and pointing out the significance and feats may to some be puffery or deemed as self promotional or promotional in general. From my understanding this is a discussion and I respect your point of view, but I also must defend my article and future ones to come. I am new and novice, at best, and will continue to contribute with these subjects amongst others. My point is that when something is new or unfamiliar to you it is not to be discounted to your opinion, yes I understand that new bands and businesses are here for the exact reasons that you accuse my article of being, but it is the significance that the business has to the industry and the fact it is heavily involved in many notable aspects within the industry is why it is encyclopedic. If I were writing about a new engine that had a unique technology or system, i may not understand the significance, but I would read into the new business as promotional etc. Wiki BioInfo (talk) 22:09, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's not the issue here. An article could be about something notable, and if it were written like a commercial admins would *still* delete it as promotional. The problem isn't that it's new, it's the tone in which the article was written (which is why, just going by whatever I can deduce from the logs as I am not an admin, I pointed you at the NPOV policies).
To be on Wikipedia (which is, after all, an encyclopedia), an article has to fulfill three main criteria:
  1. Is the subject demonstrably notable through reliable sources?
  2. Is the article written from an unbiased viewpoint?
  3. Does the article report what the sources say?
By default, most G11 candidates I have seen fail all three (They only reference their own website, include a fair amount of puffery, and they're written in prose that induces diabetes on sight).
Please note that a G11 deletion does not mean the article is forbidden from appearing on Wikipedia. All it means is that the article needs to be completely rewritten to comply with Wikipedia policies, and that can easily be done by going through WP:Articles for creation and asking for help on IRC ( #wikipedia-en-help on freenode; see WP:IRC for more information). —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 22:22, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mecannibals

I wish to repost this article on another wiki. -Mathewignash (talk) 03:00, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

JPBS Cover page

it is a coverpage.I want to use as fair use to explain it on journal wiki page -Himanshu18in (talk) 03:20, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you're talking about the article, rather than the file you created, as the latter has yet to be deleted. Anyway:
Not done and will not be done. The page consisted only of a header and an external link, meeting speedy criterion A1. Restoring it would not help you write an actual article.
Now, to address a separate concern, Wikipedia articles do not have cover pages. If you want to write an article about the Journal of Pharmacy & BioAllied Sciences, feel free, but please do not attempt to create a cover page for it again. Thank you. lifebaka++ 15:13, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Iyris Technologies

I am creating this for my company.So please don't delete it. -Infoitechno (talk) 07:54, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.
Please also note that creating an article on your own company or organisation is strongly discouraged. Please see Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for further guidance. January (talk) 19:21, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fotomuseum Winterthur

OTRS permission received in 2011092710010311 from the individual who created the page, writing in from an email associated with http://www.fotomuseum.ch. The act of editing is agreement to the terms of use, signifying release under the CC-BY-SA-3.0 and the GFDL. -– Adrignola talk 15:22, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done January (talk) 15:28, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alfred Lyall (traveller)

OTRS permission received from webmaster in OTRS ticket 2011092410010077 for release of content at http://www.jjhc.info/lyallalfred1865.htm under CC-BY-SA-3.0. -– Adrignola talk 16:35, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done January (talk) 19:15, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Voddie Baucham

This article was deleted in 2007. Since then he has been on CNN. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f14z3cnNzzo&feature=player_embedded. National speaker, currently serves as Pastor of Preaching at Grace Family Baptist Church in Spring, TX. Has several books What He Must Be... If He Wants To Marry My Daughter,Family Driven Faith,The Ever Loving Truth,The Supremacy of Christ in a Post Modern World.204.246.67.231 (talk) 19:52, 27 September 2011 (UTC) -204.246.67.231 (talk) 19:52, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chris 'TEK' O'Ryan

I am requesting the undeletion of my page Chris 'TEK' O'Ryan. I have read WP:N, WP:V, WP:RS and WP:BIO and this article should be undeleted for the following reasons:

He is a 2008 grammy winner with an actual statue - not just certificate of contribution to a grammy winning album. He was nominated again in 2010 in the Album of the year category. He is at the top of his field and is regularly requested as a studio engineer by the the biggest artists in the world including Katy Perry, Justin Bieber, Mary J. Blige and Jennifer Lopez. He is endorsed by two of the biggest music-industry software companies (Waves and Celemony: see interviews). In 2011 he was shown on international television recording contestants in the recording studio on American Idol season 10.

I have since edited the page to make it more concise, it is at: User:BrittyGirl/Chris 'TEK' O'Ryan

Thanks!! -BrittyGirl (talk) 23:33, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done This article was deleted by AFD consensus and therefore may not be restored by this process. You could raise the issue at WP:DRV, but I think it unlikely that consensus will support restoration of the article unless O'Ryan has won or been nominated for a craft-specific award like this one, or unless you can cite more detailed independent coverage than credit lists. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 00:39, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Iyris Technologies

I am creating a page for the company.I contact the deleted administrators about the deletion of my page.When i recreate the page with the same name Iyris Technologies then i will clear those problems and the recreation page will definitely meet your terms and conditions. So please don't delete it.Allow me to recreate. -IyrisTech (talk) 09:57, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hydra_(software)

if you remove hydra software entry also remove all wikipedia entry from examples at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictionary_attack they are also software used to dictionary attacks -213.30.189.66 (talk) 12:08, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ConvertSpecs

it is just simple description of the special kind of eye glasses -Utillia (talk) 00:16, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

information Note: Article has been deleted twice, both times as G11. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 01:16, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Wikipedia is not for advertising or promotion of any kind. An encyclopedia article needs to be written without promotional phrases like "The latest american innovation... without a need to spend fortune in prescription glasses... significantly improve the life quality... ", and to show notability by giving references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 09:12, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bobcatsss

is an important annual event for the exchange of knowledge in the field of library and information science recognized not only in Europe but also worldwide. Although advertised as a conference from students for students it has the backing of the European Association for Library and Information Education and Research and professionals do present and take part in the exchange of knowledge with new generation of library and information science professionals. -141.20.192.122 (talk) 10:30, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done LadyofShalott 10:47, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(NB: it has been restored as a contested PROD ... it may still be nominated for deletion unless the problems noted in the PROD are addressed quickly) (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:07, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shatavadhani R Ganesh

OTRS permission received in ticket 2011092710004837 for content that was at this page, taken from here, under the CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GFDL licenses. -– Adrignola talk 14:18, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vampire Empire (album)

Have Proper Copyright Permission -Idaho50 (talk) 16:39, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]


In reviewing the reasons for deletion of the three music albums, I would like to have the pages restored for the following reasons: I followed formats from other artist album pages, cited sources that are verifiable, and used Wikimedia photos. Everything on the pages was given WITH PERMISSION from the Artist, with NO COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT.

Please let me know what I need to do to resolve this issue. If a copy of the original pages could be made available to me, I would be happy to work to reassure editors of my following proper procedures, or modify them, if needed.

The three deleted pages are: RE: 14:21, 21 September 2011 Fram (talk | contribs) deleted "A Broom With A View (album)" ‎ (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement: http://halloweencarols.com/music/a_broom_with_a_view)

RE: 14:21, 21 September 2011 Fram (talk | contribs) deleted "Arachnitect (album)" ‎ (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement: http://halloweencarols.com/node/11)

RE: 14:22, 21 September 2011 Fram (talk | contribs) deleted "Vampire Empire (album)" ‎ (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement: http://halloweencarols.com/music/a_broom_with_a_view)

Idaho50 (talk)

Copyright permission would need to be sent to WP:OTRS, because the author really needs to understand the licencing. These articles would have to be mercilessly edited in userspace before they could become live articles. WP:PUFFERY like "...a saucy invitation..." has to go, point blank. Youtube, facebook, myspace are neither valid references nor external links. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:18, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Marc Ecko

reasoning -207.237.16.167 (talk) 01:18, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Page isn't deleted. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 02:57, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It was until about 5 minutes ago. I was about to message the deleting admin about this when it was restored by zscout370. I would have declined this speedy and trouted the tagger for not using a descriptive edit summary. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:03, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
He created a major urban-lifestyle clothing line. I seen Ecko in high school and I left that in 2004. Sure the article is not the best, but he is way above just a simple CSD. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 03:08, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Timothy Ray West

arbitrary decision wrong -Timwest1156 (talk) 03:45, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]


First, this article was done to facilitate the adding of Mr. West to the list of actors from Kansas, which is a fact. He has acted, in a speaking role in a movie about Autism called "The Sunset Sky". It is documented on the Internet Movie Database, and a few other sites. I have found no criteria stating he had to have acted in more than one film or show to qualify. It would seem that the rules on here leave a very wide area for interpretation. I submit that if this wide latitude in deleting is going to be used then it should also be used for allowing what some may consider questionable additions, unless an administrator has definite evidence to the contrary of what is being posted. This instance is not even close since evidence was provided as requested.

The movie shows some of the troubles people with Autism and their relatives deal with and how they overcome them. It is not a documentary or Biographical film but it does depict some of the actual issues they have.

I originally tried to just add the name “Timothy Ray West” to the Kansas Actors List but was informed an article was needed. So I made one and it was “Speedy Deleted”.

Anyway, there is no reason for this page to not be posted.

Thank you!

  1. ^ http://finance.yahoo.com/q/pr?s=AGII+Profile
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=453156516"