Jump to content

Talk:Carey Mulligan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Amoammo (talk | contribs) at 19:40, 3 October 2011 (Sourcing her RSC work). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Good articleCarey Mulligan has been listed as one of the good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 4, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
February 14, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Template:Maintained

Awards

WP:V says "All material in Wikipedia articles must be attributable to a reliable published source to show that it is not original research." Awards fall within this descriptor, as they are not "common knowledge".  Chickenmonkey  20:24, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there 'Chicken Monkey'. While I do understand what your saying about the Wiki 'V' policy, the reason I don't think that the awards/nominations in the filmography chart need sources is because from what I've seen in FA actors articles (Reese Witherspoon, Maggie Gyllenhaal, Jake Gyllenhaal, Brad Pitt, Angelina Jolie, Kirsten Dunst to name a few) the article's don't source the awards in the filmography chart and only source the awards when its mentioned in the person's career section. Also, in this article's GA review the GA reviewer never mentioned any of the awards needing sourcing. Crystal Clear x3 20:57, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If the awards are mentioned in the prose, it makes sense to source them there; however, if they are not mentioned in the prose and are only mentioned in the filmography, they must be sourced in accordance with WP:V. If sourcing were not required, I could simply say Carey Mulligan won the Universe Award for Cutest Actress (which she could very well win), and nobody could say I was wrong.
If those other articles contain unsourced material, they should be edited accordingly. Chickenmonkey  21:07, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I'll remove the unsourced awards. Crystal Clear x3 23:47, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Or, we could find sources for them. The Chicago Film Critics Association Award for Best Actress actually was sourced. I assume you removed it mistakenly; so, I'll put it back.  Chickenmonkey  00:06, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Her school

She went to Woldingham School as it says here [1] but I don't know for how long. Sweetie candykim (talk) 21:23, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Personal life" section

In this section of the article it says that "Although she attended Catholic school, she considers herself spiritual" This seems perhaps slightly odd. Here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spirituality#Religion it says that "In the Catholic Church, Spirituality is generally seen as an integral part of religion" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.179.36.188 (talk) 20:24, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RSC work

She appears on the [of actors in RSC productions], but there's no mention of that in her article and I can't find a source to support it. Anyone know which job this is a reference to? Amo (talk) 19:40, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]