Sadly I have not been able to edit as actively as I would have liked to, due to a busier real-life schedule. Fulltime employment as a Keyworker for a British supermarket chain, has meant it difficult to find spare time to edit and maintain articles during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. However, I have not gone into retirement just yet. I have granted Alucard 16 permission to be a guardian of my talk page during my indefinite periods of absence.
This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.
This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.
Thank you
Thank you for helping me with the Paris Hilton article and user Erica. Please keep an extra eye on her edits. She still seems a bit trigger-happpy with her edit's on the article in my opinion. Tonight is the night London 2012!! Cheers!--BabbaQ (talk) 13:42, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Something also tells me when reviewing user Erica's edits and comments that the user isn't very old perhaps a teenager with a certain pro-Paris view however in good faith. So be aware of that. Cheers.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:58, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know how much you're anti-Semitic. But to say that Jerusalem is not a Jewish capital is the most anti-Semitic in the world ! . פארוק (talk) 13:14, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What are you going on about? I haven't even said anything of the sort. Are you getting someone else's edits confused with mine? The only posts I have said about the Jerusalem article was to a user (probably yourself, not too sure) to inform them that images are not suppose to be added at the very top of an article, above the lead section as that goes against the manual of style for Wikipedia. Images are suppose to be added into the article itself in the sections relating to the image if possible. The fact that you have just launched a personalised attack on me for no reason is just out of order, and don't be surprised if someone notices and takes action on my behalf. WesleyMouse13:17, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Why did you delete the pictures ?, And why the images are shown in the Small pictures ?. Maybe to put the flag of Palestine is more important than to show the real Jerusalem, although there is no such country, and there is no such thing. פארוק (talk) 13:33, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And thank you for calling me a person who hates Jewish - even though I have to strongly disagree with your point of view towards myself. I have many good friends who are of Jewish religion, so if I was to be anti-Semitism then wouldn't that basically mean I hate my own friends too? My real middle name is even Jewish. As for the photos I have already told you, images are not to be added at the very top of an article - it is a preferred manual of style. The way articles are set out is to have the top section (known as the lead) summarise the entire article briefly. Some articles have an infobox on the right side of them. Then the article itself covers the subject in more detail divided into relevant sections. Images may be added to those sections to illustrate what is being said in them - images do not get added to the summary lead. And why are you still posting racial remarks towards me? I'm in the right frame of mind to report this, as you are seriously violating no personal attacks. WesleyMouse13:38, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
On the Talk Page of the article of "Israel" There are whole paragraphs of anti-Semites calling delete the word "Jerusalem" as Israel's capital, And this is in addition to some trolls who write Against Jews. פארוק (talk) 13:42, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
