User talk:Dpm12

I clean out my discussions every couple of years.

Just because

a song, such as Great Balls of Fire, charts in the country charts it does not mean that the song is a country song, as per genre, as per your edit there. Great Balls of Fire also charted on the R&B charts, but that does not make it R&B. However I did not revert your edit because you are an experienced editor, I guess I'd like you to think about it or discuss it. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 16:22, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Upcoming Art+Feminism events in Oregon

You are invited to participate in Oregon's upcoming Art+Feminism events, which will be held in Portland and Eugene on Saturday, March 5, 2016. Please see the following links for additional information, or to sign up:

Portland: Yale Union (800 SE 10th Avenue), 12:00–5:00pm
Eugene: Architecture and Allied Arts (A&AA) Library (200 Lawrence Hall, University of Oregon), 12:00–5:00pm

About Art+Feminism: Art+Feminism is pleased to announce its third annual Wikipedia edit-a-thon, an all-day event designed to generate coverage of women and the arts on Wikipedia and encourage female editorship. Last year, over 1,500 participants at more than 75 events around the world participated in the second annual campaign, resulting in the creation of nearly 400 new pages and significant improvements to 500 articles on Wikipedia. For more information, see Art+Feminism.

You received this message because you have attended a Wikipedia meetup in Oregon or contributed to WikiProject Oregon. To unsubscribe from this newsletter, remove your name from this list. -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:17, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 30 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Joker (comics) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looney Tunes: Back in Action

Just to clarify, the issue I had with the "box office bomb" claim was the fact that the boxoffice mojo source does not actually state that the film was a "bomb". So it does not seem to be a reliable source for the claim. Did the film under-perform? Of course. But we should not be presumptuous about the numbers, and we should not read our own meaning into them. If there was a source that actually did refer to the film as a box office bomb, then the claim would be fine. Not to mention, on the box office bomb page, it states "Gauging the financial success of a film is difficult, and because there is no reliable definition, what makes a box-office bomb can be very subjective. Not all films that fail to earn back their estimated costs during their theatrical runs are bombs." Those are my thoughts on the matter. Perhaps SummerPhD (talk · contribs) could offer her two cents? I'm interesting in hearing her thoughts. Wikicontributor12 (talk) 06:32, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your consideration. I've given this some thought, and since no one else seems to have an issue with it, then I guess the box office mojo source is enough at this time.Wikicontributor12 (talk) 09:06, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:The-War-Tapes.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:The-War-Tapes.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:06, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Elmer Fudd

Hi, Dpm12. Wanted to explain my edit to Elmer Fudd just now. The reliable-source comics historian Don Markstein, cited in the article body, suggests a different voice actor, and when two reliable sources disagree, it's POV to choose one over the other; that's why both are listed. Behind the Voice Actors is a fine news website but it doesn't automatically supersede a noted historian. I'm sure a longtime editor like yourself understands. With regards, --Tenebrae (talk) 18:09, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello, I'm Andrewgprout. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Everybody Hurts, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Andrewgprout (talk) 02:04, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ControversialGaryColemanHospitalBedPic.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ControversialGaryColemanHospitalBedPic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ControversialGaryColemanHospitalBedPic.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ControversialGaryColemanHospitalBedPic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 18:17, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Joe Alaskey.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Joe Alaskey.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mosmof (talk) 15:00, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]