Jump to content

Talk:Anaphylaxis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by DRobert (talk | contribs) at 08:15, 28 May 2018 (translation of mistakes). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Good articleAnaphylaxis has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 27, 2011Good article nomineeListed

WikiProject iconMedicine: Dermatology / Translation GA‑class Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Dermatology task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Translation task force (assessed as Top-importance).

US Death Rate

The article includes "Currently, anaphylaxis leads to 500–1,000 deaths per year (2.4 per million) in the United States, 20 deaths per year in the United Kingdom (0.33 per million), and 15 deaths per year in Australia (0.64 per million)."

It seems odd that the rate in the US is seven time higher than in the UK. I have found this [1] that gives a much lower rate (0.86 per million) in a recent US study. MB 16:03, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Per ths source "These results indicate that the US has one of the highest prevalences of fatal anaphylaxis in the world". Appears to be based on a 2010 study.
What we have in the article is based on this source [2] which is a peer reviewed review article.
Have added this estimate aswell.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:56, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Diagnosis, 2nd bullet

Hello James or Wakkie1379, you really think, that involvement of the skin or mucosa AND gastrointestinal symptoms together means anafylaxis? Urtica and diarrhea after strawberries? --DRobert (talk) 08:15, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]