Jump to content

User talk:128.23.195.159

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by AnomieBOT (talk | contribs) at 19:09, 3 September 2018 (Substing templates: {{ANI-notice}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Welcome

[edit]
Hello, 128.23.195.159! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Try to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Good luck. -fnlayson (talk) 14:19, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MSAs and CBSAs

[edit]

I think you're misunderstanding the definitions. CBSAs are indeed the current definition used by the OMB. CBSAs are of two types: metropolitan statistical area and micropolitan statistical area. Everything you have added is still there -- I just move text around. What is your specific concern? --Polaron | Talk 19:13, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Where do you see reference to CBSAs from OMB definitions 128.23.195.159 (talk) 19:27, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See here. --Polaron | Talk 19:47, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have the U.S. Census Bureau creating there own definitions of MSAs. The ones directly from OMB are the only official ones.128.23.195.159 (talk) 19:52, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree. The Census Bureau just applies the definition to Census data. But then nothing in the article contradicts that. --Polaron | Talk 00:04, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"The U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) defines a set of core based statistical areas (CBSAs) throughout the country. CBSAs are delineated on the basis of a central urban area or urban cluster—a contiguous area of relatively high population density."

Do you see how someone has created a brand new definition grouping - core based statistical areas - when OMB only states "at the core", they could have used "at the center" or "at the heart of". A lot in that paragraph needs to be cleaned up since it reads wrong.````

Please read the Federal Register that is linked in the article. They specifically use "Core Based Statistical Area". There is also a glossary at the end of that Federal Register notice. --Polaron | Talk 16:54, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The term "Core Based Statistical Area" (CBSA) is a collective term for both metro and micro areas loosely used by Census, it isn't a definition.

The source listed that was removed when you rolled back my edit is a reliable secondary source that establishes North Charleston's annexation of portions of Berkeley and Dorchester counties. Per WP:PRIMARY, such a secondary source is preferable to tertiary sources, of which the SCIWAY website as a compendium is one. I would appreciate in the future if you would discuss things such as this either on my talk page or on the appropriate article's talk page rather than conducting a wholesale rollback, especially as you're using an anonymous account, making it difficult to ensure that I've contacted the right person. Thank you.  Cjmclark (Contact) 00:30, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Talk:North Charleston, South Carolina for further information.  Cjmclark (Contact) 03:11, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I found this map drafted by the City Planning Department which shows the city boundaries. This should be a more suitable source, so I have cited it instead. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. Thanks.  Cjmclark (Contact) 17:56, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of ANI discussion

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is edit warring and possible sockpuppetry on Charleston, South Carolina. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 17:21, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]