Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Funds2Orgs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 14:19, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Funds2Orgs

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG. The reliable sources are mainly not about this organisation but Soles4Souls, the ones discussing this organisation are of dubious reliablility and for a specialist audience therefore not conferring notability (WP:AUD). Also seemingly created by an undisclosed paid editor. I suggest redirect to Wayne Elsey. SmartSE (talk) 15:27, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:49, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:50, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Merge the respective content with Wayne Elsey, and potentially into Soles4Souls as well if necessary. Funds2Org is a real organization, the sources, however dubious, prove this is such. However, I'm not sure whether it warrants its own page, as the sources are not reliable. Therefore, making a small paragraph mentioning it on Wayne Elsey's article is probably the best option, as long as there is AT LEAST one good source, which I'm confident there is. If need be, sorting the content on Elsey's and the Soles4Soles' pages also could work. Utopes (talk) 22:14, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:21, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 14:17, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: does not meet WP:NORG / WP:CORPDEPTH. Sourcing is in passing and / or WP:SPIP. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:47, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete none of the sources meets the criteria for establishing notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 16:04, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.