Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moha Ramos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 08:59, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Moha Ramos

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed by article creator who said that "Since he represented the top tier fully professional leagues so, I feel the article needs not to be deleted and he is gonna play for Birmingham this season" [sic]. That violates WP:CRYSTAL, and article fails WP:GNG (no significant coverage) and WP:NFOOTBALL (has never played in a fully-pro league). Giant Snowman 09:12, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:13, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:28, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:28, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:28, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

He appeared for Birmingham City FC and for RM Castilla side so has played in fully pro leagues so I don't consider any point in deleting the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by SHISHIR DUA (talk • contribs)

He has not appeared for Birmingham City and RM Castilla do not play in a fully-professional league, they play in the Segunda División B which is not listed as it is semi-pro. Giant Snowman 12:26, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --BlameRuiner (talk) 06:11, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.