Jump to content

User talk:Srkris

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Srkris (talk | contribs) at 16:27, 15 December 2006 (Removed hate messages posted by User:Pluto.2006). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archive
Archives
Friday
8
November
13:07 UTC

Take heart

Hi Kris, I feel really sad that you have to endure what you're going through. Please take heart. Wikipedia is a community of million plus human beings and there are bound to be 'nuts' roaming around. I dont know which 'nut' you may have bumped into, causing you so much distress, but I also keep bumping into such people on wikipedia. Any time we come across such people, far from losing heart, we should resolve to weed out such people and protect the fair name and purpose of wikipedia. Letting such people get under your skin will only be playing straight into their hands. I request you to make a conscious effort not to let such 'nuts' bother you and to return with renewed vigor and purpose. Wikipedia sorely needs and deserves more editors like you and less of the nuts. Sarvagnya 20:27, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you come back, it was nice working with you on WP:HINDU. The point is to build a hammer and crack the nuts.Bakaman 04:26, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I agree while or paths haven't crossed as of yet, your shining light glows from your generosity and your great work. Cheers and good luck wherever you are. — Seadog 20:56, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
He is already here editing anonymously. cheers Parthi talk/contribs 21:01, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Avoidance of the blocks

See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#It_is_quite_easy_to_ignore_blocks

I have double your original block and blocked the IP. Please do not violate the terms of your blocks by using multiple accounts. If you think your original block was unfair please argue with your original blocker. Alex Bakharev 00:04, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Srkris (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

What does the above message mean and why is he doubling my block? He hasnt provided any reason! I merely gave User:Ncmvocalist a warning for removing my comment on Talk:Carnatic music

Decline reason:

How did you give a warning to User:Ncmvocalist when blocked? By changing IP's and evading your block. That is why your block has been increased. Please do not edit till your block has expired. -- HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 15:08, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.