Talk:Thomas Talbot (Massachusetts politician)

Thomas Talbot (Massachusetts politician) has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 1, 2017. (Reviewed version).

United States: Massachusetts / Governors GA‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. governors (assessed as Low-importance).

Biography GA‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Thomas Talbot (Massachusetts)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ealdgyth (talk · contribs) 13:14, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be reviewing this article shortly. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:14, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Political career:
- "In 1872, he was chosen Lieutenant Governor, serving two terms under"... was he elected or chosen?
- "On the election of Washburn to the United States Senate in early 1874" - was Washburn elected or was he selected? I'm pretty sure at this point, US Senators were chosen by the state legislatures - so it needs to be made clear that Washburn wasn't chosen by the people - he was selected some other way. Done Magic♪piano 19:16, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- From looking at Massachusetts State Police, it appears that the police had only been established in 1865 - do any sources give any reason for wanting the police force disbanded?
  - "which were charged with the law's enforcement" - the state police were a football in the temperance battle. Magic♪piano 19:16, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- "Talbot refused to run in 1875." Massachusetts has governor elections every year????
  - Had, until 1920, when they went to two years; four year terms came in the 1960s. Magic♪piano 19:16, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I randomly googled three phrases and only turned up Wikipedia mirrors. Earwig's tool shows no sign of copyright violation.

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:38, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Monday and Tuesday are hubby's off work days, so will get to this probably Wednesday. (It is possible I might get to it before but...) Ealdgyth - Talk 13:29, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Or his list of "to-do" was shorter than I expected... will be passing this now. Ealdgyth - Talk 15:37, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on September 7, 2020.