Talk:Chapman Guitars

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chapman Guitars article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 May 2010. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Guitarists: Equipment

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Guitarists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Guitarists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GuitaristsWikipedia:WikiProject GuitaristsTemplate:WikiProject Guitaristsguitarist articles
	This article is supported by Guitar equipment task force.

Musical Instruments Low‑importance

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Musical Instruments, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of musical instruments on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Musical InstrumentsWikipedia:WikiProject Musical InstrumentsTemplate:WikiProject Musical Instrumentsmusical instruments articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

indirect advertisement of online guitar shop.

Hello,

I wanted to start a small discussion concerning the line of the article below.

"However, now the production has grown up consistently, as you can see visiting Andertons website."

Providing also a link for the store. I am new in Wikipedia editing so I would like to ask whether you believe that this should be deleted or changed somehow.

Sorry if this is too obvious for some people but I am not familiar with these concepts.

New edit: Now the page has been renewed excluding the indirect advertisement. Thanks to the contributor.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sopapado (talk • contribs) 08:07, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

totally agree. I actually like their guitars, but this wiki page is so fucking blatantly an advertisment edited by one of their people. kinda embarrassing for them. Δ (talk) 11:11, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This site still looks like one big advert/catalogue, and provides no information regarding the "scandal" in the US, or any useful dates/info for models, just a useless list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.136.22.154 (talk) 08:10, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As of September 2023 this article still reads like an advertisement from way back, when Chapman guitars started. 84.147.93.233 (talk) 21:17, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]