User talk:J.kunikowski

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Massacre of Lviv professors

You cannot remove sourced information, per wikipedia rules. Please avoid that in the future.--Galassi (talk) 00:21, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cut the BS. Just because a "source" is claiming something it doesn't mean it should be on wikipedia. Otherwise everything, just everything could be included. J.kunikowski (talk) 12:21, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Information was misquoted - see [1] Thank you Jo0doe (talk) 08:01, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I am not surprised. J.kunikowski (talk) 12:20, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. I notice that you removed topically-relevant content from Massacre of Lviv professors. However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. You have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mutt Lunker (talk) 13:33, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Massacre of Lviv professors. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.Faustian (talk) 13:37, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You just made your 4th revert here: [2], ignoring the warning I placed, above.Faustian (talk) 14:08, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Massacre of Lviv professors. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Sandstein 16:46, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring (repeated reversion) is forbidden even if you believe that the text you seek to remove is insufficiently sourced. Whether that is so must be determined through consensus after dispute resolution, and not through edit-warring. Sandstein 16:48, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to Eastern Europe if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Digwuren#Final decision. Sandstein 16:48, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|I apology for my behavior, I thought it is okay to remove clearly wrong text. I promise I will not do this again.}}

I like how this guy who supposedly has only just discovered wikipedia is able to file this and this: [3].Faustian (talk) 16:53, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I spent nearly two hours reading wikipedia help files and there I found information about the noticeboard for administrators. And where did I say that "I have only just discovered wikipedia"!? I know of wikipedia from at least from 2004. J.kunikowski (talk) 16:59, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

J.kunikowski, please state whether you have ever edited Wikipedia by means of another account, and how, if unblocked, you intend to proceed with respect to the disagreement as a result of which you were blocked. Sandstein 16:57, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I used to edit wikipedia under IP time ago but it was different back then. If unblocked I will not remove the text again. I have already reported the issue on administration board and I hope they will take a look at the situation and decide. J.kunikowski (talk) 17:02, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Thank you for agreeing not to continue edit-warring. Please be make sure that the removal you propose is supported by consensus before you make it. Be aware that administrators will not decide this dispute. Admins do not decide how articles should read. This must be settled by you and the other editors according to the process set out at WP:DR.

Request handled by: Sandstein

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.