Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armageddon (Marvel Comics)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to List of minor Marvel Comics characters. Spartaz Humbug! 04:24, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Armageddon (Marvel Comics) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG - no significant coverage in multiple reliable third party sources. [[User:Anthem of joy|Anthem]] (talk) 17:13, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to List of minor Marvel Comics characters. Two characters share the name Armageddon. One is a minor character of an alternate universe [1] [2] and the other Armageddon (Arm'Chedon) is in the main continuity [3] [4] [5]--Crazy runner (talk) 21:33, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per Crazy runner. BOZ (talk) 15:13, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into List of minor Marvel Comics characters. Thanks, Starblueheather (talk) 15:13, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per nomination. The fictional character does not meet the general notability guideline and the content can only be a plot-only description of a fictional work. Since the content is not sourced and any content would come from primary sources or by original research by synthesis, I do not believe that a merge is warranted. Jfgslo (talk) 16:21, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
