Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JPL (cyclecar)

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ✗plicit 23:50, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

JPL (cyclecar)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a short-lived manufacturer with a few mentions in lists of manufacturers. I'm not seeing significant coverage per the GNG. JMWt (talk) 17:15, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Michigan. JMWt (talk) 17:15, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - as per above and cool history page to have Mr Vili talk 22:53, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a tribute to the legacy, the page has existed from 2007 to the present. However, frankly speaking, it does not meet the General Notability Guidelines (GNG). --Johnpaul2030 (talk) 08:53, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - covered in at least two reliable sources (Kimes, Georgano), both independent of the subject. I see no justification for deleting this entry. Mr.choppers | ✎ 15:50, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Added two more sources, expanded a touch to include the revised, water-cooled Model F. Mr.choppers | ✎ 19:30, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:17, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - with multiple reliable independent sources, it passes GNG, and the article has enough content to explain the topic. --Sable232 (talk) 15:35, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: sourcing in history looking good after additions. notability met. Password ^{(talk)(contribs)} 06:26, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.