Wikipedia talk:GLAM
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
|
|||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
The 10 most-viewed, worst-quality articles according to Wikipedia:GLAM/Indiana Historical Society
- 270 Tomlinson Hall 155 5 Unknown Unknown
- 69 DePuy 2,537 81 Stub Low
- 148 Bernard Vonnegut I 620 20 Stub Low
- 160 JayC Food Stores 500 16 Stub Low
- 183 Hamlin's Wizard Oil 377 12 Stub Low
- 201 Meredith Nicholson 300 9 Stub Mid
- 215 Golden Age of Indiana Literature 261 8 Stub Low
- 222 Belmont, Indiana 228 7 Stub Low
- 236 Laughner's Cafeteria 204 6 Stub Low
- 239 Stout Army Air Field 196 6 Stub Low
Wikipedia:GLAM/Indiana Historical Society/Popular pages
Assistance requested with editor being paid by New England Conservatory of Music to update their article
Eudaemonism is being paid by the New England Conservatory of Music to update their article. I'm engaged in a discussion about COI in their User Talk page. Additional assistance and opinions from other editors would be appreciated! ElKevbo (talk) 02:58, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Project-independent quality assessments
Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:16, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
