Stephen Thomas (economist): Difference between revisions
expanding |
expanding |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Professor Thomas has been quite critical of the idea that the nuclear power industry is undergoing a "renaissance". In May 2009 he said: |
Professor Thomas has been quite critical of the idea that the nuclear power industry is undergoing a "renaissance". In May 2009 he said: |
||
<blockquote> |
<blockquote> |
||
We've been waiting in vain on a 'Nuclear Renaissance' in Europe since the early 1990s. Even before the recent collapse in energy prices and the financial downturn, it was clear that all of the talk of a new resurgence in the prospects for nuclear reactors was just that: talk.<ref>[http://news.prnewswire.com/DisplayReleaseContent.aspx?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/05-20-2009/0005030201&EDATE= U.K. Expert: U.S. is Not Losing International 'Race' on Nuclear Power With France and Other Nations]</ref> |
We've been waiting in vain on a 'Nuclear Renaissance' in Europe since the early 1990s. Even before the recent collapse in energy prices and the financial downturn, it was clear that all of the talk of a new resurgence in the prospects for nuclear reactors was just that: talk.<ref name=tom>[http://news.prnewswire.com/DisplayReleaseContent.aspx?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/05-20-2009/0005030201&EDATE= U.K. Expert: U.S. is Not Losing International 'Race' on Nuclear Power With France and Other Nations]</ref> |
||
</blockquote> |
|||
In terms of the nuclear power industry in the USA, Professor Thomas said, in May 2009: |
|||
<blockquote> |
|||
U.S. efforts to revive nuclear ordering, begun in 2002, were originally expected to get a new plant on-line by 2010. Even if there are no further delays, the earliest a new plant could be on-line is now looking closer to 2020. In the meantime, the nuclear industry has upped its demands for taxpayer-backed loan guarantees to build demonstration plants from about $5 billion to more than $100 billion. The prospect that these demonstration plants would lead to unsubsidized ordering now looks fanciful.<ref name=tom/> |
|||
</blockquote> |
</blockquote> |
||
Revision as of 03:38, 21 May 2009
Stephen Thomas is professor at the University of Greenwich Business School, and has been a researcher in the area of energy policy for over 25 years. He specialises in the economics and policy of nuclear power, liberalisation and privatisation of the electricity and gas industries, and trade policy on network energy industries. Professor Thomas serves on the editorial boards several periodicals including Energy Policy, Utility Policy, Energy and Environment, and International Journal of Regulation and Governance.[1]
Professor Thomas has been quite critical of the idea that the nuclear power industry is undergoing a "renaissance". In May 2009 he said:
We've been waiting in vain on a 'Nuclear Renaissance' in Europe since the early 1990s. Even before the recent collapse in energy prices and the financial downturn, it was clear that all of the talk of a new resurgence in the prospects for nuclear reactors was just that: talk.[1]
In terms of the nuclear power industry in the USA, Professor Thomas said, in May 2009:
U.S. efforts to revive nuclear ordering, begun in 2002, were originally expected to get a new plant on-line by 2010. Even if there are no further delays, the earliest a new plant could be on-line is now looking closer to 2020. In the meantime, the nuclear industry has upped its demands for taxpayer-backed loan guarantees to build demonstration plants from about $5 billion to more than $100 billion. The prospect that these demonstration plants would lead to unsubsidized ordering now looks fanciful.[1]
Selected recent publications[1]
- International Perspectives on Energy Policy and the Role of Nuclear Power, Multi-Science Publishing, 2009.
- The grin of the Cheshire cat, Energy Policy, vol 34, 15, 2006, pp 1974-1983.
- The British Model in Britain: failing slowly, Energy Policy, vol 34, 5, 2006, pp 583-600.
- The UK Nuclear Decommissioning Authority, Energy & Environment, vol 16, no 6, 2005, pp 923-935.
- Evaluating the British Model of electricity deregulation, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, vol 75, 3, 2004, pp 367-398.
See also
References
