Talk:Newborn monument
A fact from Newborn monument appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 April 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Note
[edit]Added Kosovo note, per its agreed usage. This monuments commemorate independence that is still disputed and readers must know that. --WhiteWriterspeaks 22:30, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
- Article is about a monument, not about independence itself. By insisting on putting the note on every single article no matter what it is about, you are pushing your POV. --Arianit (talk) 08:14, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
- What are you talking about, this note is used on thousands of pages by massive number of editors since 2008. And you didnt understand its purpose, it is used as a disclaimer regarding the Kosovo independence dispute, with the main idea of preventing usage of locational entries like:
- ...disputed province of Kosovo,
- ...Kosovo/Serbia,
- ...Serbian province of Kosovo,
- ...Serbia (Kosovo), etc.
- This note can be used after the plain word Kosovo in the main text. So, this is not about Kosovo, but its geo location. Please, do not remove it anymore, it was agreed to use it long, long time ago by neutral editors. --WhiteWriterspeaks 21:54, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
- You have no concensus for you desire to keep the disclaimer. This article is about a momument and it pertains solely to the Republic of Kosovo itself regardless of if some countries still don't recognize it. The disclaimer should be to avoid ambiguations, like Kosovo in the 1990's which was disputed between Republic of Kosova and Serbia. Keithstanton (talk) 09:25, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
- Was this comment a reply to WhiteWriter or just a supporting rant to your affiliated account above? Each part of your statement is trumped by the post preceding yours. Try reading it. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 09:56, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
- You have no concensus for you desire to keep the disclaimer. This article is about a momument and it pertains solely to the Republic of Kosovo itself regardless of if some countries still don't recognize it. The disclaimer should be to avoid ambiguations, like Kosovo in the 1990's which was disputed between Republic of Kosova and Serbia. Keithstanton (talk) 09:25, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Obama
[edit]Obama praised the monument. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.114.76.189 (talk) 16:52, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Newborn monument. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130206215503/http://www.newkosovareport.com/200807041018/Society/newborn-the-symbol-of-kosovo-independence.html to http://www.newkosovareport.com/200807041018/Society/newborn-the-symbol-of-kosovo-independence.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121116220124/http://www.coloribus.com/focus/outdoor-ads-as-monuments-sculptures-stunts-installations-statues/11933155/ to http://www.coloribus.com/focus/outdoor-ads-as-monuments-sculptures-stunts-installations-statues/11933155/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101231132812/http://www.goldendrum.com/media/gdr.2008.pdf to http://www.goldendrum.com/media/gdr.2008.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:05, 17 February 2018 (UTC)