User talk:Vrubel's Demons

Your signature

Vrubel was Russian, thus Демоны Врубеля. Materialscientist (talk) 09:53, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, you are right. Thanks. Демоны Врубеля/Vrubel's Demons (talk) 21:39, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Nato Vachnadze

On November 7, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nato Vachnadze, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page _{(here's how)} and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 23:15, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Salt for Svanetia

Hello! Your submission of Salt for Svanetia at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Materialscientist (talk) 01:25, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Salt for Svanetia

On November 12, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Salt for Svanetia, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page _{(here's how)} and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Jake Wartenberg 17:15, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Alexanderplatz demonstration

On November 16, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Alexanderplatz demonstration, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page _{(here's how)} and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Jake Wartenberg 13:21, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wolfgang Petersen‎

I'm not going to revert anymore and dont care enough to be involved in the discussion but it clearly says at WP:Navigation templates that "Red links should be avoided unless they are very likely to be developed into articles, and even if they do, editors are encouraged to write the article first", and I dont see anyone jumping on creating them and its not likely that they will be.--Yankees10 21:13, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well when this consensus was made was anyone aware of what it says at Wikipedia:Navigation templates.--TheMovieBuff (talk) 19:17, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They have been on there forever I dont see anyone creating them. Plus TV films are usually not notable enough to have articles.--TheMovieBuff (talk) 19:22, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I dont have a problem with TV films being included I just dont like the redlinks. I can almost guarentee these films will not be created.--TheMovieBuff (talk) 19:32, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Vrubel, I urge you not to get too upset about the ANI. I will just note to you that George, after discussion with me at my talk page, has refactored his post to reflect only a warning to me. My whole purpose here was only to remove what I perceived as a disruptive influence in the area so that productive editors such as yourself would not be driven away. Please just stay away from the ANI and get back to work. Those ANIs are enough to give one a heart attack, let alone heartburn. Take care and have a good day. Stellarkid (talk) 16:38, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Tylman (4th nomination)

Hi, Vrubel's Demons. Because you participated in Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 January 18#Richard Tylman, you may be interested in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Tylman (4th nomination). Cunard (talk) 02:14, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ciesandwhispers.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ciesandwhispers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:17, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Vake-Saburtalo District

A tag has been placed on Category:Vake-Saburtalo District indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:30, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]