User talk:Suddenly There Is a Valley

This user may have left Wikipedia. Suddenly There Is a Valley has not edited Wikipedia since June 13, 2017. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

AfD nomination of Melody Rules

I have nominated Melody Rules, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melody Rules. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thanks. — Phil Fry (talk) 13:31, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User ID

When I saw your user ID, my first thought was that it meant you were skeptical as to whether the past existed or not. Have you heard the one about the dyslexic agnostic? Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 10:34, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't directly answer the question, but I gather the answer is that you have, in fact, heard about the dyslexic agnostic. :) Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 10:43, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of I Saw It in the Mirror

I have nominated I Saw It in the Mirror, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Saw It in the Mirror. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 19:40, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Drawing board

Hello, Retro Agnostic. Thank you for your note at the drawing board. You have a reply. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 00:39, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much

		The WikiProject Films Award
		I, Firsfron of Ronchester, hereby award Retro Agnostic the WikiProject Films Award for his/her valued contibutions to WikiProject Films. Thanks so much for your hard work on early television articles. Your work on articles relating to early programs of the DuMont Television Network are greatly appreciated, and I hereby present you with this award. Awarded 00:17, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphan tag/category

Hi, I noticed that you added both the {{orphan}} template AND Category:Orphaned articles to the Mack & Myer for Hire article. I just wanted to let you know that this is redundant, as the orphan template automically places the article in the category. Thanks, and keep up the good work!--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 19:04, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Classic ABC: The Universal Masters Collection

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Classic ABC: The Universal Masters Collection, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 04:10, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the prod tag. Here's a another ABC compilation album that you can use as a model: Look of Love - The Very Best of ABC. Cheers!--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 05:19, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- P.S. By the way, it is certainly ok to remove the prod warning by yourself if you're contesting the deletion. You don't need to wait for someone else to do it. Happy editing!--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 05:19, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Glad to help. If you want to know anything, just ask! :) --Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 07:19, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Attacks in the article Superstar Series

Please do not make personal attacks as you did at Superstar Series. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Slp1 (talk) 01:16, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan

Linked from "few or no" articles, apparently specifically being defined as "less than 3". So, just what does that mean? That if it's not linked from at least 3, it's going to get deleted? Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 03:20, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

Hey, I was looking at He May Be Old, But He's Got Young Ideas, and I notice that you've got the line "can be found on various websites such as the internet archive." I think I saw a similar line on one of your other articles. Why don't you add a link to the song, or at least to that site, in an 'External Links' section? That'd be pretty useful to people. Also, adding some links to references would probably help, too. Have fun!--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 16:56, 7 June 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Suddenly There Is a Valley. You have new messages at Aervanath's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Monkees NPOV and cleanup tags

When you add NPOV and cleanup tags to an article, please put a note on the talk page describing the problems with the article in your estimation. These tags can't be removed without a resolution of the discussion ... so the person adding the tags needs to initiate a discussion. It's most helpful if the initial topic is thorough and detailed. Thanks! Acsenray (talk) 21:14, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Betty Hutton Show

Hi! I added a bit more info on this article you created. I had no idea the fabulous Betty Hutton even had a series! I'm going to have to find that DVD. Anyway, I basically just sourced this from things I found on the web, so if you have any reliable sources, please add them! Also, I'm not really sure about how many episodes were produced or aired, but TV.com says something 30 or 31. Does that sound right to you? I'd like to at least add an episode list or something to sort of round it out, I think those obscure old shows at deserve to be covered as accurately as possible. Pinkadelica 05:36, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your article question

Hi, RA. The notability and importance of the articles is not an issue. The problem I see is that your articles have bare external links but no inline citations to footnote references and that's what is needed to prove verifiability and notability, especially with more obscure or esoteric subjects. If you placed these in your articles, and remove the what we call "peacocking" (terms like famous, best-selling, ect. are not allowed and will eventually be deleted), then the articles basically cannot be challenged in any way. If you would like me to lend a hand to give the articles standardized wikipedia footnote citations I will be happy to help if you let me know because I hate to see someone's good intention article contested or deleted. Mjpresson (talk) 15:22, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great work!

Hey, I am doing New Page Patrol and I saw your article on Charade Quiz. That is a great addition to the project -- keep up the wonderful work! Ecoleetage (talk) 20:55, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ecoleetage (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

If you ever need help with researching, just whistle. Thanks! Ecoleetage (talk) 21:03, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DuMont articles

Hi Retro,

Thanks so much for creating so many articles on DuMont series. Please continue making them. :) However, please keep in mind to cite references so that the articles don't get tagged as unsourced. Please also use the manual of style when creating these: the names of TV series appear in italics, never "quotes". The first word in a heading gets capitalized; the rest do not. And it's not necessary (or advisable) to create headings or sections for individual sentences, as you've done here. Thanks so much for creating these stubs. Best wishes and happy editing, Firsfron of Ronchester 08:37, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of The Countdown Singers

I have nominated The Countdown Singers, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Countdown Singers. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 15:20, 15 October 2008 (UTC) Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 15:20, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of The Hit Crew

I have nominated The Hit Crew, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hit Crew. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 16:17, 15 October 2008 (UTC) Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 16:17, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mazandaran TV

I just corrected the spelling, so got rid of that tag,but non-neutral POV? I can't find any evidence of that, but I know nothing about Iranian TV, so just put your evidence on the talk page to reinstate. Jarry1250 (talk) 15:55, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of For Pete's Sake (song)

I have nominated For Pete's Sake (song), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/For Pete's Sake (song). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ~~Juvenile Deletionist~~ 19:22, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Let's Join Joanie.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Let's Join Joanie.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:22, 30 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 15:22, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fourth television network

Hi Valley,

You left some comments on the talk page of this article, and made some edits which I don't believe were appropriate (added fact tags in the middle of quoted passages, removed a fully-cited paragraph and slapped a POV tag on the article, then left a message on the talk page, followed immediately by blanking that message). Please respond on talk:Fourth television network so I can figure out what the problem is. Firsfron of Ronchester 05:43, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Suddenly There Is a Valley! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 338 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Roy Lee Johnson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:03, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:TV series with episodes in the public domain

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 20:54, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

KHDF-CA

Hi, I see you put a contradict flag on KHDF-CA in October 2008. I've just been looking through the article, and I can't see any contradictions. As there wasn't a note on the talk page, or in the edit summary, I've removed the flag. If you think it should still be there, please feel free to put it back and put a note on the talk page, explaining why. Cheers. -- WORM MЯOW 10:18, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Daddy, Come Home

The article Daddy, Come Home has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced, tagged since 2008

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fayenatic (talk) 19:05, 13 May 2011 (UTC) Timestamp: 20110507220610[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Payless Entertainment

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Payless Entertainment requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Epeefleche (talk) 03:36, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Top of the Pops, Volume 62.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Top of the Pops, Volume 62.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:14, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Top of the Pops, Volume 10.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Top of the Pops, Volume 10.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:15, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Top of the Pops, Volume 49 by Top of the Poppers cover art.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Top of the Pops, Volume 49 by Top of the Poppers cover art.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:15, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Top of the Pops, Volume 56.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Top of the Pops, Volume 56.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:31, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Top of the Pops, Volume 2.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Top of the Pops, Volume 2.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:33, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Top of the Pops, Volume 20.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Top of the Pops, Volume 20.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:33, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Top of the Pops, Volume 18.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Top of the Pops, Volume 18.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:34, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Top of the Pops 79 album.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Top of the Pops 79 album.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:05, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Top of the pops 76 album.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Top of the pops 76 album.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:05, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Best of Top of the Pops '69.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Best of Top of the Pops '69.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:27, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Best of Top of the Pops '70.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Best of Top of the Pops '70.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:29, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Top of the Pops 74 album.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Top of the Pops 74 album.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:36, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Top of the Pops album '80.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Top of the Pops album '80.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:36, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Top of the Pops album '77.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Top of the Pops album '77.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:54, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Top of the Pops album '78.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Top of the Pops album '78.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:54, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Best of Top of the Pops '75.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Best of Top of the Pops '75.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:54, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shell Presents, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ATV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:21, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Little Amy.JPG missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Little Amy.JPG

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 09:41, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Club Seven, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Late Show (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:26, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of programs broadcast by ABC Television, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fancy Free. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ABC Universal Masters Collection cover.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ABC Universal Masters Collection cover.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:31, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Spanish Notebook

The article Spanish Notebook has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is no significant, independent coverage of the topic (WP:N)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Hello! I proposed the deletion of Spanish Notebook. I do not believe the article could ever conform to notability guidelines, simply because the only two sources (after a quick Google) are the ones listed: a BBC archive page (WP:IS) and an uninformative IMDB page (WP:PSTS). Please don't be offended. If you can improve the article, please remove my tag and comment on my talk page. :) Denny1213 (talk) 16:35, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Shuvokhan123. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Blind Date (Australian game show), and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. shuvokhan123 18:00, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Love the work you've done for Aussie TV of the 50s and 60s Dutchy85 (talk) 15:13, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:America One logo.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:America One logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:14, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vikki (TV series)

The article Vikki (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has no visible verifiable references from reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 05:25, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Variety on View

The article Variety on View has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has no visible verifiable references from reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 05:29, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Three Tough Guys (TV series)

The article Three Tough Guys (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has no visible verifiable references from reliable sources for most of the content, except a claim that the episodes are missing, and no claim of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 05:47, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 05:51, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Suddenly There Is a Valley. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Suddenly There Is a Valley. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your article "The Countdown Singers"

In your article, you list several sub-names of this name from Madacy Entertainment. But why not the following, perhaps the most successful and best known?:

https://countdownkids.fandom.com/wiki/Countdown_Kids_Wiki

Thanks muchHistoryBuff14 (talk) 15:21, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gary Reilly Productions.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gary Reilly Productions.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bertrand (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bertrand (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bertrand (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:53, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1931 television series endings

A tag has been placed on Category:1931 television series endings requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:08, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Discovering the Bible for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Discovering the Bible is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Discovering the Bible until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dronebogus (talk) 21:31, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Little Amy

Hello, Suddenly There Is a Valley. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Little Amy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:09, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kiernan's Corner

The article Kiernan's Corner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

"Not much is known about it", meaning that it fails WP:V. Couldn't find any sourcing

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 13:58, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Opinions on Trial

The article Opinions on Trial has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Billboard sources do not mention the show. Fails WP:V

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:47, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Take the Break

The article Take the Break has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Second source is a TV Guide listing. As this only aired on one affiliate in TV's infancy, sourcing is likely to be very low at best

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:39, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Take the Break for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Take the Break is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Take the Break until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:23, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Masks Through the Ages

The article Masks Through the Ages has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable TV miniseries. Zero in-depth coverage located on a search.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:24, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Masks Through the Ages for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Masks Through the Ages is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masks Through the Ages until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:57, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Because I'm Married Now

The article Because I'm Married Now has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable song

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jax 0677 (talk) 15:39, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cordon Bleu Kitchen

The article Cordon Bleu Kitchen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 05:17, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Words and Music (TV series)

The article Words and Music (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 05:19, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Billabong Band

The article Billabong Band has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG, tagged for notability since 2013

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 14:00, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rhythm Roundup

The article Rhythm Roundup has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2018

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 20:16, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Today (1960 TV series)

The article Today (1960 TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. I haven't added any references to the article yet, so the article only has 1 reference.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 (his talk page) 05:49, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Little Women (1958 TV series)

The article Little Women (1958 TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG for not including any references to significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of Let's All Go to Mary's House

The article Let's All Go to Mary's House has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources located, including in newspaper archives. Fails WP:NSONG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The World in Your Home for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The World in Your Home is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The World in Your Home until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Boleyn (talk) 17:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]