Abstract
Background
A prospective, randomized Phase III trial was performed to determine whether, compared with gemcitabine (GEM) alone, the addition of cisplatin (CDDP) to GEM was able to improve the time to disease progression and the clinical benefit rate in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The objective response rate, overall survival rate, and toxicity patterns of patients in the two treatment arms were evaluated as secondary end points.Methods
Patients with measurable, locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were randomized to receive GEM (Arm A) or a combination of GEM and CDDP (Arm B). In Arm A, a dose of 1000 mg/m(2) GEM per week was administered for 7 consecutive weeks, and, after a 2-week rest, treatment was resumed on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle for 2 cycles. In Arm B, CDDP was given at a dose of 25 mg/m(2) per week 1 hour before GEM at the same dose that was used in Arm A. On Day 22, only GEM was administered. Patients were restaged after the first 7 weeks of therapy and then again after the other 2 cycles.Results
A total of 107 patients entered the trial: Fifty-four patients were randomized to Arm A, and 53 patients were randomized to Arm B. The median time to disease progression was 8 weeks in Arm A and 20 weeks in Arm B; this difference was statistically significant (P = 0.048). In Arm A, one complete response and four partial responses were recorded on the basis of an intent-to-treat analysis, with an overall response rate of 9.2% (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 3-20%). In Arm B, there were no complete responses, whereas 14 partial responses were achieved, with an overall response rate of 26.4% (95%CI, 15-40%). This difference in the overall response rates was statistically significant (P = 0.02). The tumor growth control rate (i.e., total number of patients who achieved complete responses, partial responses, and stable disease) was 42.6% (95%CI, 29-57%) in Arm A and 56.6% (95%CI, 42-70%) in Arm B. A clinical benefit was observed in 21 of 43 patients (49%) in Arm A and in 20 of 38 patients (52.6%) in Arm B without any significant difference. The median overall survival was 20 weeks for patients in Arm A and 30 weeks for patients in Arm B (P = 0.43). Toxicity was mild in both treatment arms, with no significant differences between the two groups except for the statistically higher incidence of Grade 1-2 asthenia in Arm B (P = 0.046).Conclusions
The addition of CDDP to GEM significantly improved the median time to disease progression and the overall response rate compared with GEM alone. The clinical benefit rate was similar in both arms, whereas the median overall survival rate was more favorable for Arm B, although the difference did not attain statistical significance. The authors conclude that the combination of CDDP and GEM currently may be considered as an optimal treatment for patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.Full text links
Read article at publisher's site: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.10323
Read article for free, from open access legal sources, via Unpaywall: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/cncr.10323
References
Articles referenced by this article (38)
Cancer of the pancreas. In: editors. Cancer: principles and practice of oncology, 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1997: 1054-87.
Chemotherapy prolongs survival in inoperable pancreatic carcinoma.
Br J Surg, (6):882-885 1994
MED: 8044610
Chemotherapy improves survival and quality of life in advanced pancreatic and biliary cancer.
Ann Oncol, (6):593-600 1996
MED: 8879373
5-fluorouracil, Adriamycin, and mitomycin-C (FAM) chemotherapy for advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.
Cancer, (9):2014-2018 1980
MED: 7427908
Treatment of metastatic pancreatic and gastric adenocarcinomas with 5-fluorouracil, adriamycin, and mitomycin C (FAM).
Cancer Treat Rep, (11-12):2049-2051 1979
MED: 393388
Phase II trial of streptozotocin, mitomycin-C and 5-fluorouracil (SMF) in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.
Cancer, (2):387-391 1978
MED: 147131
Randomized trial of 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C with or without streptozotocin for advanced pancreatic cancer. A Southwest Oncology Group study.
Cancer, (9):1577-1582 1983
MED: 6225508
A comparison of three chemotherapeutic regimens in the treatment of advanced pancreatic and gastric carcinoma. Fluorouracil vs fluorouracil and doxorubicin vs fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and mitomycin.
JAMA, (14):2061-2067 1985
MED: 2579257
Title not supplied
J Clin Oncol 1986
Show 10 more references (10 of 38)
Citations & impact
Impact metrics
Article citations
A rat-based preclinical platform facilitating transcatheter hepatic arterial infusion in immunodeficient rats with liver xenografts of patient-derived pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Sci Rep, 14(1):10529, 08 May 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 38719893 | PMCID: PMC11079078
A real-world study of anlotinib combined with GS regimen as first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 14:1110624, 20 Jan 2023
Cited by: 2 articles | PMID: 36742383 | PMCID: PMC9897321
Is gemcitabine (GEM)-based combination therapy good for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer?
J Gastrointest Oncol, 14(1):478-479, 06 Jan 2023
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 36915424 | PMCID: PMC10007943
The efficacy and safety of gemcitabine-based combination therapy vs. gemcitabine alone for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Gastrointest Oncol, 13(4):1967-1980, 01 Aug 2022
Cited by: 5 articles | PMID: 36092340 | PMCID: PMC9459213
Targeted Delivery of Cisplatin by Gold Nanoparticles: The Influence of Nanocarrier Surface Modification Type on the Efficiency of Drug Binding Examined by CE-ICP-MS/MS.
Int J Mol Sci, 23(4):2324, 19 Feb 2022
Cited by: 2 articles | PMID: 35216438 | PMCID: PMC8874575
Go to all (244) article citations
Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
Gemcitabine or gemcitabine plus cisplatin for in 42 patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi, 24(4):404-407, 01 Jul 2002
Cited by: 16 articles | PMID: 12408777
Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer.
J Clin Oncol, 24(24):3946-3952, 01 Aug 2006
Cited by: 403 articles | PMID: 16921047
Gemcitabine alone versus combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin for the treatment of patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of multicenter study.
Neoplasma, 59(3):297-301, 01 Jan 2012
Cited by: 9 articles | PMID: 22329849
Gemcitabine-based combination therapy compared with gemcitabine alone for advanced pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of nine randomized controlled trials.
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 16(3):236-244, 01 Jun 2017
Cited by: 9 articles | PMID: 28603091
Review