Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


Although HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) DNA polymerase and ribonuclease H (RNase H) activities reside in spatially distinct domains of the enzyme, inhibitors that bind in the RT polymerase domain can affect RNase H activity. We used both gel assays and a real-time FRET assay to analyze the impact of three mechanistically distinct RT polymerase inhibitors on RNase H activity in vitro. The nucleoside analogue 3'-azido-3'-deoxythymidine triphosphate (AZT-TP) had no effect, whereas the pyrophosphate analogue phosphonoformate (PFA) inhibited RNase H activity in a concentration-dependent manner. Nonnucleoside RT inhibitors (NNRTIs) enhanced RNase H catalysis, but the cleavage products differed substantially for RNA/DNA hybrid substrates of different lengths. A comparison of 61 different RT crystal structures revealed that NNRTI binding opened the angle between the polymerase and RNase H domains of the p66 subunit and reduced the relative motion of the thumb and RNase H regions, suggesting that NNRTI enhancement of RNase H cleavage may result from increased accessibility of the RNase H active site to the RNA/DNA hybrid duplex. We also examined the effects of combining a diketo acid (DKA) RNase H inhibitor with various RT polymerase inhibitors on polymerase-independent RNase H cleavage, RNA-dependent DNA polymerization, and in reverse-transcription assays. Interestingly, although the NNRTI decreased DKA potency in polymerase-independent RNase H assays, NNRTI/DKA combinations were synergistic in inhibiting reverse transcription overall, indicating that regimens incorporating both NNRTI and RNase H inhibitors may be therapeutically beneficial.

Citations & impact 


Impact metrics

Jump to Citations

Citations of article over time

Article citations


Go to all (49) article citations

Similar Articles 


To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.