Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


Purpose of review

Despite improved care of multiple injured patients, controversial data about the best time point for decompression and stabilization of spine fractures and spinal cord injuries are published. Some studies even question the value of surgical management.

Recent findings

In several mostly retrospective studies and a meta-analysis, there is growing evidence that early decompression and stabilization of spine injuries seems to be beneficial, especially in more severely injured patients. Early stabilization seems to reduce length of stay and pulmonary complications. Some studies report on improved neurological outcome and improved survival; however, other new studies add controversial data.

Summary

Most studies support the hypothesis that early decompression and stabilization of spine injuries is beneficial in terms of reducing length of stay at the ICU, as well as improving neurological and overall outcome. Good prospective clinical trials are still missing, thus the level of evidence remains low.

References 


Articles referenced by this article (32)


Show 10 more references (10 of 32)

Citations & impact 


Impact metrics

Jump to Citations

Citations of article over time

Article citations


Go to all (20) article citations