Abstract
Purpose
To compare a new insertion method using an EndoGlide (Angiotech/Network Medical Products) with the standard Busin glide (Moria USA) assisted insertion of the posterior lamellar corneal graft in Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK).Design
Prospective, consecutive, comparative, nonrandomized study.Methods
Surgery was performed between October 2008 and October 2010 in 52 eyes of 52 consecutive patients with endothelial dysfunction suitable for DSEK. Twenty-two consecutive eyes underwent the new EndoGlide-assisted insertion of donor lenticule and 30 eyes underwent the surgery using the Busin glide. Six-month follow-up data are available for all patients. Clinical details, best-corrected visual acuity, manifest refraction, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and corneal endothelial cell loss were assessed at 6 months after DSEK.Results
At 6 months after surgery, the best-corrected visual acuity was similar in both groups (0.13 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution in the EndoGlide eyes as compared with 0.15 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution in the Busin group; P = .34). Mean spherical equivalent was 0.65 diopter (D) and 0.51 D, and mean refractory cylinder was 1.39 D and 1.08 D, respectively (P = .40). The endothelial cell loss was much lower in the EndoGlide group (25.76%) as compared with the Busin group (47.46%; P < .0001).Conclusions
In conclusion, the new EndoGlide results in significantly less endothelial cell loss than Busin glide donor insertion in DSEK. The visual outcomes and refractive changes were similar in both groups.References
Articles referenced by this article (21)
Endothelial cell loss after descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty influencing factors and 2-year trend.
Ophthalmology, (5):857-865 2007
MED: 17868873
Endothelial cell loss after Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty in a large prospective series.
Ophthalmology, (3):488-496.e3 2007
MED: 18164063
Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with a graft insertion device: surgical technique and early clinical results.
Am J Ophthalmol, (2):223-32.e2 2010
MED: 21168813
Suture-assisted vs forceps-assisted insertion of the donor lenticula during Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
Am J Ophthalmol, (6):986-990 2008
MED: 18400197
Experience and 12-month results of descemet-stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) with a small-incision technique.
Cornea, (3):279-283 2007
MED: 17413953
Early results of small-incision Descemet's stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty.
Ophthalmology, (2):221-226 2006
MED: 17156845
Graft insertion during Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: pulling the graft inward.
J Cataract Refract Surg, (4):534-536 2008
MED: 18361964
Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: effect of inserting forceps on DSAEK donor tissue viability by using an in vitro delivery model and vital dye assay.
Cornea, (9):1079-1081 2007
MED: 17893538
Glide insertion technique for donor cornea lenticule during Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
J Cataract Refract Surg, (11):1846-1850 2007
MED: 17964386
Show 10 more references (10 of 21)
Citations & impact
Impact metrics
Article citations
Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty via a frown incision.
Jpn J Ophthalmol, 68(1):50-56, 02 Jan 2024
Cited by: 1 article | PMID: 38163816
Clinical Outcomes of the Intraocular Lens Injector and Busin Glide for Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Patients with Iridocorneal Endothelial Syndrome.
J Clin Med, 12(5):1856, 26 Feb 2023
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 36902643 | PMCID: PMC10003726
Techniques, Outcomes, and Complications of Preloaded, Trifolded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Using the DMEK EndoGlide.
Cornea, 40(5):669-674, 01 May 2021
Cited by: 5 articles | PMID: 33470675 | PMCID: PMC9922541
Clinical evaluation of a newly developed graft inserter (NS Endo-Inserter) for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
Clin Ophthalmol, 13:43-48, 21 Dec 2018
Cited by: 4 articles | PMID: 30613132 | PMCID: PMC6306049
Donor, Recipient, and Operative Factors Associated With Increased Endothelial Cell Loss in the Cornea Preservation Time Study.
JAMA Ophthalmol, 137(2):185-193, 01 Feb 2019
Cited by: 21 articles | PMID: 30422157 | PMCID: PMC6439830
Go to all (27) article citations
Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
Busin Guide vs Forceps for the Insertion of the Donor Lenticule in Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.
Am J Ophthalmol, 147(2):220-226.e1, 18 Oct 2008
Cited by: 51 articles | PMID: 18930446
Comparison of posterior lamellar keratoplasty techniques to penetrating keratoplasty.
Ophthalmology, 115(9):1525-1533, 28 Apr 2008
Cited by: 164 articles | PMID: 18440638
[Posterior lamellar keratoplasty with DSEK technique and use of the Tan EndoGlide - short-term results].
Klin Oczna, 115(1):44-47, 01 Jan 2013
Cited by: 1 article | PMID: 23882739
Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty: safety and outcomes: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Ophthalmology, 116(9):1818-1830, 30 Jul 2009
Cited by: 351 articles | PMID: 19643492
Review