Abstract
Purpose
To describe a novel, small-incision, no-fold Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) graft injector and to compare complications, visual acuity, and endothelial cell loss with a forceps technique.Methods
An Institutional Review Board-approved, interventional, nonrandomized, consecutive case series analysis of 175 eyes undergoing DSAEK for Fuchs dystrophy and bullous keratopathy. The injector arm is prospective, and the forceps arm is retrospective. Seventy grafts were performed with a DSAEK graft injector, and 105 grafts were performed using a small-incision forceps technique. Preoperative and postoperative visual acuities at 3 and 6 months, 6-month endothelial cell counts, and complications, including graft dislocation, failure, and rejection, were recorded. Fifty-seven of 232 eyes met exclusion criteria for previous incisional corneal or glaucoma surgery.Results
There were 4 eyes (5.7%) in the injector group and 29 eyes (27.6%) in the forceps group that required a re-bubble procedure because of graft detachment. One graft (1.4%) failed in the injector group and 7 grafts (6.5%) failed in the forceps group. Excluding eyes with other ocular comorbidities (43), in the injector group 74% were 20/40 or better at 6 months and 100% were 20/60 or better. In the forceps group, 72% were 20/40 or better at 6 months and 98% were 20/60 or better. Six-month postoperative endothelial cell counts were available for 84 (46 injector and 38 forceps) eyes, with an average cell loss of 28.3% in the injector group and 44.1% in the forceps group.Conclusions
DSAEK is an effective treatment of endothelial dysfunction. Surgical technique is important to limit endothelial cell loss and prevent complications, such as graft dislocation. The injector device has several advantages over the trifold forceps technique, including decreased endothelial cell loss, graft dislocation rate, and graft failure rate, and it reduces the DSAEK learning curve. DSAEK graft injectors likely will have a role in the future of endothelial keratoplasty.References
Articles referenced by this article (29)
A technique to excise the descemet membrane from a recipient cornea (descemetorhexis).
Cornea, (3):286-288 2004
MED: 15084862
Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 50 eyes: a refractive neutral corneal transplant.
J Refract Surg, (4):339-345 2005
MED: 16128330
Endothelial cell loss after Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty in a large prospective series.
Ophthalmology, (3):488-496.e3 2007
MED: 18164063
Precut tissue for Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: vision, astigmatism, and endothelial survival.
Ophthalmology, (2):248-256 2008
MED: 19091414
Endothelial keratoplasty: vision, endothelial survival, and complications in a comparative case series of fellows vs attending surgeons.
Am J Ophthalmol, (1):26-31.e2 2009
MED: 19375061
Endothelial cell damage in descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with the underfold technique: 6- and 12-month results.
Cornea, (9):1022-1024 2010
MED: 20543667
Endothelial cell loss after descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty influencing factors and 2-year trend.
Ophthalmology, (5):857-865 2007
MED: 17868873
Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty: safety and outcomes: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Ophthalmology, (9):1818-1830 2009
MED: 19643492
Show 10 more references (10 of 29)
Citations & impact
Impact metrics
Article citations
Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty via a frown incision.
Jpn J Ophthalmol, 68(1):50-56, 02 Jan 2024
Cited by: 1 article | PMID: 38163816
Clinical Evaluation of the NS Endo-Inserter, a Novel Donor Inserter for Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.
Case Rep Ophthalmol, 10(3):357-364, 01 Sep 2019
Cited by: 2 articles | PMID: 31762768 | PMCID: PMC6873084
Donor, Recipient, and Operative Factors Associated With Increased Endothelial Cell Loss in the Cornea Preservation Time Study.
JAMA Ophthalmol, 137(2):185-193, 01 Feb 2019
Cited by: 21 articles | PMID: 30422157 | PMCID: PMC6439830
Component corneal surgery: An update.
Indian J Ophthalmol, 65(8):658-672, 01 Aug 2017
Cited by: 5 articles | PMID: 28820150 | PMCID: PMC5598175
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Tissue Insertion Devices.
J Ophthalmic Vis Res, 10(4):461-468, 01 Oct 2015
Cited by: 7 articles | PMID: 27051492 | PMCID: PMC4795397
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
Go to all (18) article citations
Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
Comparison of posterior lamellar keratoplasty techniques to penetrating keratoplasty.
Ophthalmology, 115(9):1525-1533, 28 Apr 2008
Cited by: 164 articles | PMID: 18440638
Busin Guide vs Forceps for the Insertion of the Donor Lenticule in Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.
Am J Ophthalmol, 147(2):220-226.e1, 18 Oct 2008
Cited by: 51 articles | PMID: 18930446
Descemet stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in eyes with failed penetrating keratoplasty.
Cornea, 26(6):692-696, 01 Jul 2007
Cited by: 50 articles | PMID: 17592318
Meta-Analysis of Postoperative Outcome Parameters Comparing Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.
Cornea, 36(12):1445-1451, 01 Dec 2017
Cited by: 35 articles | PMID: 28957976
Review